Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
10 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
12 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
40 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Platoon Fundamental Diagram estimation can be Markovian: evidence from human- and self-driven vehicle trajectories (2401.17065v1)

Published 30 Jan 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: We propose a simple and effective method to derive the Fundamental Diagram (FD) from platoon vehicle trajectories. Average traffic state variables are computed using Edie's generalized definitions within time-dependent trapezoidal space-time areas. To obtain a clear FD, we employ a bivariate data aggregation technique to eliminate scatter. Our findings are as follows: (i) The proposed method demonstrates a remarkably consistent relation between the traffic variables and a clear triangular shape for autonomously-driven vehicles. (ii) The FDs are invariant to several factors of heterogeneity such as the platoon length, vehicle characteristics, road particularities, and data acquisition accuracy. (iii) ACC-driven vehicle platoons with minimum headway setting achieve much higher capacity, roughly 90\% than those with a large headway setting. (iv) Connectivity might increase capacity. (v) Human drivers have a wider near-capacity operation area, showing different behaviors at high speeds than low ones, and (vi) Safety concerns might arise due to high values of backward wave speed for ACC-driven vehicles. Comparative analysis with the state-of-the-art confirms the validity of our approach. The proposed method stands out due to its simplicity and accuracy, which paves the way for practical applications in real-time traffic flow monitoring and control within modern intelligent transportation systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Energy-Based Assessment and Driving Behavior of ACC Systems and Humans Inside Platoons. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 1–10doi:doi:10.1109/TITS.2023.3285296. conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
  2. The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 7, 429–436. doi:doi:10.1109/TITS.2006.884615. conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
  3. Comparing the Observable Response Times of ACC and CACC Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 1–10doi:doi:10.1109/TITS.2022.3165648. conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
  4. Relation Among Average Speed, Flow, and Density and Analogous Relation Between Density and Occupancy. Transportation Research Record 1591, 1–6. URL: https://doi.org/10.3141/1591-01, doi:doi:10.3141/1591-01. publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  5. Towards vehicle automation: Roadway capacity formulation for traffic mixed with regular and automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 100, 196–221. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261516305471, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.01.017.
  6. Requiem for second-order fluid approximations of traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 29, 277–286. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/019126159500007Z, doi:doi:10.1016/0191-2615(95)00007-Z.
  7. Adaptive control with moving actuators at motorway bottlenecks with connected and automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 156, 104319. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X2300308X, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104319.
  8. Discussion of traffic stream measurements and definitions. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, London 1963. , 139–154OCLC: 291099209.
  9. Are Commercially Implemented Adaptive Cruise Control Systems String Stable? IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22, 6992–7003. doi:doi:10.1109/TITS.2020.3000682.
  10. The energy impact of adaptive cruise control in real-world highway multiple-car-following scenarios. European Transport Research Review 12, 17. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00406-w, doi:doi:10.1186/s12544-020-00406-w.
  11. Automated Highway Systems. Springer US, Boston, MA. URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4757-4573-3, doi:doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4573-3.
  12. Enhancing model-based feedback perimeter control with data-driven online adaptive optimization. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 96, 26–45. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126151630710X, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.10.011.
  13. Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: An improved measurement method. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45, 385–391. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261510001013, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.07.006.
  14. Car-following behavior characteristics of adaptive cruise control vehicles based on empirical experiments. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 147, 67–91. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261521000424, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trb.2021.03.003.
  15. Crash risk analysis for the mixed traffic flow with human-driven and connected and autonomous vehicles, in: 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 1233–1238. doi:doi:10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564897.
  16. Analysis of road capacity and pollutant emissions: Impacts of Connected and automated vehicle platoons on traffic flow. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 583, 126301. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437121005744, doi:doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126301.
  17. Universality of Area Occupancy-Based Fundamental Diagrams in Mixed Traffic. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4474351, doi:doi:10.2139/ssrn.4474351.
  18. Formalizing the heterogeneity of the vehicle-driver system to reproduce traffic oscillations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 120, 102803. Publisher: Pergamon.
  19. Open ACC Database. European Commission, Joint Research Centre -. URL: http://data.europa.eu/89h/9702c950-c80f-4d2f-982f-44d06ea0009f.
  20. OpenACC. An open database of car-following experiments to study the properties of commercial ACC systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 125, 103047. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X21000772, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103047.
  21. Response Time and Time Headway of an Adaptive Cruise Control. An Empirical Characterization and Potential Impacts on Road Capacity. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 1677–1686. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8884686, doi:doi:10.1109/TITS.2019.2948646.
  22. The impact of automation and connectivity on traffic flow and CO2 emissions. A detailed microsimulation study. Atmospheric Environment 226, 117399. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231020301382, doi:doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117399.
  23. An adaptive framework for real-time freeway traffic estimation in the presence of CAVs. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 149, 104066. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X23000554, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104066.
  24. Fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics for real-time assessment of rear-end collision risk. A study based on empirical observations. Accident Analysis & Prevention 148, 105794. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457520316146, doi:doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105794.
  25. Probabilistic field approach for motorway driving risk assessment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 118, 102716. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X20306318, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.102716.
  26. Constructing a fundamental diagram for traffic flow with automated vehicles: Methodology and demonstration. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 150, 279–292. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261521001235, doi:doi:10.1016/j.trb.2021.06.011.
  27. CARMA Testing and Evaluation of Research Mobility Applications. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DoT URL: https://ntl.bts.gov/public-access, doi:doi:10.21949/1503647. publisher: Not Available.
  28. Test and Evaluation of Vehicle Platooning Proof-of-Concept Based on Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DoT URL: https://ntl.bts.gov/public-access, doi:doi:10.21949/1503647. publisher: Not Available.
  29. Investigation of traffic dynamics by aerial photogrammetry techniques. Engineering Experiment Station, Ohio State University. URL: https://trid.trb.org/view/30152. number: EES-278 Final Rpt.
  30. The hysteresis phenomenon in traffic flow, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory held at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia from 26-28 August 1974., pp. 13–38. URL: https://trid.trb.org/view/40314.
  31. Analysis of Headway and Speed Based on Driver Characteristics and Work Zone Configurations Using Naturalistic Driving Study Data. Transportation Research Record 2675, 1196–1210. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211015261, doi:doi:10.1177/03611981211015261. publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.