Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Localizing uniformly moving single-frequency sources using an inverse 2.5D approach (2401.16819v2)

Published 30 Jan 2024 in eess.AS and cs.SD

Abstract: Localizing linearly moving sound sources using microphone arrays is challenging as the transient nature of the signal leads to relatively short observation periods. Commonly, a moving focus is used and most methods operate at least partially in the time domain. In contrast, this manuscript presents an inverse source localization algorithm for uniformly moving single-frequency sources that acts entirely in the frequency domain. For this, a 2.5D approach is utilized and a transfer function between sources and a microphone grid is derived. By solving a least squares problem using the data at the microphone grid, the unknown source distribution in the moving frame can be determined. First, the time signals need to be transformed from time into frequency domain using a windowed discrete Fourier transform (DFT), which leads to spectral leakage that depends on the length of the time interval and the analysis window used. To include spectral leakage in the numerical model, the calculation of the transfer matrix is modified using the Fourier transform of the analysis window in the DFT applied to the measurements. Currently, this approach is limited to single-frequency sources as this restriction allows for simplified calculations and reduces the computational effort. The least squares problem is solved using a Tikhonov regularization and an L-curve approach. As moving sources are considered, utilizing the Doppler effect enhances the stability of the system by combining the transfer functions for multiple frequencies in the measured signals. The performance is validated using simulated data of a moving point source with or without a reflecting ground. Numerical experiments are performed to show the effect of the choice of frequencies in the receiver spectrum, the effect of the DFT, the source frequency, the distance between source and receiver, and the robustness with respect to noise.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover, New York, 9th edition, 1970.
  2. D. Blacodon and G. Élias. Level estimation of extended acoustic sources using an array of microphones. 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, 41(6), 2003.
  3. A deconvolution approach for the mapping of acoustic sources (DAMAS) determined from phased microphone arrays. J. Sound Vib., 294(4):856–879, 2006.
  4. Acoustic beamforming for noise source localization - Reviews, methodology and applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 120:422–448, 2019.
  5. J. Christensen and J. Hald. Beamforming. Technical Report B&K Technical Review 1, B&K, 2004.
  6. Rotating acoustic source localization: A power propagation forward model and its high-resolution inverse methods. Measurement, 174:109006, 2021.
  7. A time domain CLEAN approach for the identification of acoustic moving sources. J. Sound Vib., 443(March):47–62, 2019.
  8. A. T. de Hoop. Fields and waves excited by impulsive point sources in motion - The general 3D time-domain Doppler effect. Wave Motion, 43(2):116–122, 2005.
  9. R. P. Dougherty. Extensions of DAMAS and benefits and limitations of deconvolution in beamforming. Collection of Technical Papers - 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 3:2036–2048, 2005.
  10. D. Duhamel. Efficient calculation of the three-dimensional sound pressure field around a noise barrier. J. Sound Vib., 197(5):547–571, 1996.
  11. D. Duhamel and P. Sergent. Sound propagation over noise barriers with absorbing ground. J. Sound Vib., 218(5):799–823, 1998.
  12. 2.5D singular boundary method for exterior acoustic radiation and scattering problems. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 143(June):293–304, 2022.
  13. V. Fleury and J. Bulté. Extension of deconvolution algorithms for the mapping of moving acoustic sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 129(3):1417–1428, 2011.
  14. Sound source localization – state of the art and new inverse scheme. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 138(3):229–243, 2021.
  15. S. Guerin and C. Weckmüller. Frequency-domain reconstruction of the point-spread function for moving sources. In Proceedings on CD of the 2nd Berlin Beamforming Conference (BeBeC), pages CD–ROM, 2008.
  16. P. C. Hansen. Regularization Tools Version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3. Numerical Algorithms, pages 189–194, 2007.
  17. The Use of the L-Curve in the Regularization of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 14(6):1487–1503, 1993.
  18. G. Herold and E. Sarradj. Performance analysis of microphone array methods. J. Sound Vib., 401:152–168, 2017.
  19. M. Hornikx and J. Forssén. The 2.5-dimensional equivalent sources method for directly exposed and shielded urban canyons. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 122(5):2532, 2007.
  20. Selecting the corner in the L-curve approach to Tikhonov regularization. IEEE T. Bio.-Med. Eng., 47(9):1293–1296, 2000.
  21. Extending standard urban outdoor noise propagation models to complex geometries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 143(4):2066–2075, 2018.
  22. An efficient quadrature for 2.5D boundary element calculations. J. Sound Vib., 382:213–226, 2016.
  23. Using a 2.5D boundary element model to predict the sound distribution on train external surfaces due to rolling noise. J. Sound Vib., 486:1–37, 2020.
  24. Signal reconstruction of fast moving sound sources using compressive beamforming. Appl. Acoust., 150:236–245, 2019.
  25. A review of acoustic imaging methods using phased microphone arrays. CEAS Aeronaut. J., 10:197–230, 2019.
  26. P. M. Morse and K. Uno Ingard. Theoretical acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987.
  27. SODIX for fully and partially coherent sound sources. In Proceedings on CD of the 9th Berlin Beamforming Conference (BeBeC), pages 1–15, 2022.
  28. Discrete-time signal processing. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2 edition, 1998.
  29. Hypersingular boundary integral equation for harmonic acoustic problems in 2.5D domains with moving sources. Eur. J. Comput. Mech., 28(1-2):81–96, 2019.
  30. The Large Time-Frequency Analysis Toolbox 2.0. In Sound, Music, and Motion, LNCS, pages 419–442. Springer International Publishing, 2014.
  31. Sound source reconstruction using inverse boundary element calculations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 113(1):114–127, 2003.
  32. T. Schumacher and H. Siller. Hybrid approach for deconvoluting tonal noise of moving sources. In Proceedings on CD of the 9th Berlin Beamforming Conference (BeBeC), pages CD–ROM, 2022.
  33. P. Sijtsma. CLEAN Based on Spatial Source Coherence. Int. J. Aeroacoust., 6(4):357–374, 2007.
  34. T. Suzuki. L1 generalized inverse beam-forming algorithm resolving coherent/incoherent, distributed and multipole sources. J. Sound Vib., 330(24):5835–5851, 2011.
  35. The MathWorks Inc. MATLAB version: 9.14.0 (R2023a). Natick, Massachusetts, United States, 2023.
  36. X. Wei and W. Luo. 2.5D singular boundary method for acoustic wave propagation. Appl. Math. Lett., 112:106760, 2021.
  37. A covariance fitting approach for correlated acoustic source mapping. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 127(5):2920–2931, 2010.
  38. Implications of the directivity of railway noise sources for their quantification using conventional beamforming. J. Sound Vib., 459:114841, 2019.
  39. A hybrid time and frequency domain beamforming method for application to source localisation on high-speed trains. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 200:110494, 2023.
  40. Non-negative least squares deconvolution method for mirror-ground beamforming. J. Vib. Control, 22(16):3470–3478, 2016.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.