Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Contracting with a Learning Agent (2401.16198v1)

Published 29 Jan 2024 in cs.GT, cs.AI, cs.LG, and econ.TH

Abstract: Many real-life contractual relations differ completely from the clean, static model at the heart of principal-agent theory. Typically, they involve repeated strategic interactions of the principal and agent, taking place under uncertainty and over time. While appealing in theory, players seldom use complex dynamic strategies in practice, often preferring to circumvent complexity and approach uncertainty through learning. We initiate the study of repeated contracts with a learning agent, focusing on agents who achieve no-regret outcomes. Optimizing against a no-regret agent is a known open problem in general games; we achieve an optimal solution to this problem for a canonical contract setting, in which the agent's choice among multiple actions leads to success/failure. The solution has a surprisingly simple structure: for some $\alpha > 0$, initially offer the agent a linear contract with scalar $\alpha$, then switch to offering a linear contract with scalar $0$. This switch causes the agent to ``free-fall'' through their action space and during this time provides the principal with non-zero reward at zero cost. Despite apparent exploitation of the agent, this dynamic contract can leave \emph{both} players better off compared to the best static contract. Our results generalize beyond success/failure, to arbitrary non-linear contracts which the principal rescales dynamically. Finally, we quantify the dependence of our results on knowledge of the time horizon, and are the first to address this consideration in the study of strategizing against learning agents.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Guru Guruganesh (23 papers)
  2. Yoav Kolumbus (15 papers)
  3. Jon Schneider (50 papers)
  4. Inbal Talgam-Cohen (41 papers)
  5. Emmanouil-Vasileios Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis (26 papers)
  6. Joshua R. Wang (10 papers)
  7. S. Matthew Weinberg (75 papers)
Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.