Revising clustering and small-worldness in brain networks (2401.15630v1)
Abstract: As more connectome data become available, the question of how to best analyse the structure of biological neural networks becomes increasingly pertinent. In brain networks, knowing that two areas are connected is often not sufficient, as the directionality and weight of the connection affect the dynamics in crucial ways. Still, the methods commonly used to estimate network properties, such as clustering and small-worldness, usually disregard features encoded in the directionality and strength of network connections. To address this issue, we propose using fully-weighted and directed clustering measures that provide higher sensitivity to non-random structural features. Using artificial networks, we demonstrate the problems with methods routinely used in the field and how fully-weighted and directed methods can alleviate them. Specifically, we highlight their robustness to noise and their ability to address thresholding issues, particularly in inferred networks. We further apply our method to the connectomes of different species and uncover regularities and correlations between neuronal structures and functions that cannot be detected with traditional clustering metrics. Finally, we extend the notion of small-worldness in brain networks to account for weights and directionality and show that some connectomes can no longer be considered ``small-world''. Overall, our study makes a case for a combined use of fully-weighted and directed measures to deal with the variability of brain networks and suggests the presence of complex patterns in neural connectivity that can only be revealed using such methods.
- X.-J. Wang and H. Kennedy, Brain structure and dynamics across scales: in search of rules, Current opinion in neurobiology 37, 92 (2016).
- P. Bonifazi and P. Massobrio, Reconstruction of functional connectivity from multielectrode recordings and calcium imaging, Advances in neurobiology 22, 207 (2019).
- D. S. Bassett and O. Sporns, Network neuroscience, Nature neuroscience 20, 353 (2017).
- S. F. Muldoon, E. W. Bridgeford, and D. S. Bassett, Small-world propensity and weighted brain networks, Scientific reports 6, 22057 (2016).
- S. Whitfield-Gabrieli and A. Nieto-Castanon, Conn: A functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks, Brain Connectivity 2, 125 (2012), pMID: 22642651, https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0073 .
- M. Rubinov and O. Sporns, Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations, NeuroImage 52, 1059 (2010), computational Models of the Brain.
- P. Kale, A. Zalesky, and L. L. Gollo, Estimating the impact of structural directionality: How reliable are undirected connectomes?, Network Neuroscience 2, 259 (2018).
- G. P. Clemente and R. Grassi, Directed clustering in weighted networks: A new perspective, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 107, 26 (2018).
- G. Fagiolo, Clustering in complex directed networks, Physical Review E 76, 026107 (2007).
- B. Zhang and S. Horvath, A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology 4, Article17 (2005).
- G. Buzsáki and K. Mizuseki, The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15, 264 (2014).
- Y. Loewenstein, A. Kuras, and S. Rumpel, Multiplicative dynamics underlie the emergence of the log-normal distribution of spine sizes in the neocortex in vivo, Journal of Neuroscience 31, 9481 (2011).
- K. Ryan, Z. Lu, and I. A. Meinertzhagen, The CNS connectome of a tadpole larva of Ciona intestinalis (L.) highlights sidedness in the brain of a chordate sibling, eLife 5, e16962 (2016).
- K. Gruters and J. Groh, Sounds and beyond: Multisensory and other non-auditory signals in the inferior colliculus, Frontiers in Neural Circuits 6, 96 (2012).
- S. Ito and D. A. Feldheim, The Mouse Superior Colliculus: An Emerging Model for Studying Circuit Formation and Function, Frontiers in Neural Circuits 12, 10 (2018).
- https://wormwiring.org/pages/adjacency.html.
- https://elifesciences.org/articles/16962/figures#SD6-data.
- https://neuprint.janelia.org/.
- https://github.com/connectome-neuprint/neuprint-python.
- https://neurodata.io/project/connectomes/.
- B. A. Pailthorpe, Network analysis of mesoscale mouse brain structural connectome yields modular structure that aligns with anatomical regions and sensory pathways, bioRxiv , 755041 (2019).
- A. Carleton, R. Accolla, and S. A. Simon, Coding in the mammalian gustatory system, Trends in Neurosciences 33, 326 (2010), 20493563 .
- M. Di Bonito and M. Studer, Cellular and Molecular Underpinnings of Neuronal Assembly in the Central Auditory System during Mouse Development, Frontiers in Neural Circuits 11, 18 (2017), 28469562 .
- F. De Castro, Wiring olfaction: The cellular and molecular mechanisms that guide the development of synaptic connections from the nose to the cortex, Frontiers in Neuroscience 3, 4 (2009).
- D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks, in The Structure and Dynamics of Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006) pp. 301–303.
- D. D. S. Price, A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27, 292 (1976).