Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Unsocial Intelligence: an Investigation of the Assumptions of AGI Discourse (2401.13142v4)

Published 23 Jan 2024 in cs.CY

Abstract: Dreams of machines rivaling human intelligence have shaped the field of AI since its inception. Yet, the very meaning of human-level AI or artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains elusive and contested. Definitions of AGI embrace a diverse range of incompatible values and assumptions. Contending with the fractured worldviews of AGI discourse is vital for critiques that pursue different values and futures. To that end, we provide a taxonomy of AGI definitions, laying the ground for examining the key social, political, and ethical assumptions they make. We highlight instances in which these definitions frame AGI or human-level AI as a technical topic and expose the value-laden choices being implicitly made. Drawing on feminist, STS, and social science scholarship on the political and social character of intelligence in both humans and machines, we propose contextual, democratic, and participatory paths to imagining future forms of machine intelligence. The development of future forms of AI must involve explicit attention to the values it encodes, the people it includes or excludes, and a commitment to epistemic justice.

PDF HTML Abstract
Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (131)
  1. Roles for computing in social change. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372871
  2. Mapping the Landscape of Human‐Level Artificial General Intelligence. AI Magazine 33, 1 (March 2012), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v33i1.2322
  3. Bina Agarwal. 2001. Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework. World Development 29, 10 (Oct. 2001), 1623–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3
  4. Blaise Agüera y Arcas and Peter Norvig. 2023. Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Here. https://www.noemamag.com/artificial-general-intelligence-is-already-here
  5. Natalia Rogach Alexander and Philip Kitcher. 2021. Educating Democratic Character. Moral Philosophy and Politics 8, 1 (April 2021), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2019-0041 Publisher: De Gruyter.
  6. Anna Alexandrova and Mark Fabian. 2022. Democratising Measurement: or Why Thick Concepts Call for Coproduction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12, 1 (March 2022), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00437-7
  7. Elizabeth Anderson. 2002. Situated Knowledge and the Interplay of Value Judgments and Evidence in Scientific Inquiry. In In the Scope of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Peter Gärdenfors, Jan Woleński, and Katarzyna Kijania-Placek (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0475-5_8
  8. Elizabeth Anderson. 2006. The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 3, 1-2 (June 2006), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8 Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Elizabeth Anderson. 2023. Dewey’s Moral Philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 ed.), Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (Eds.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  10. Elizabeth S. Anderson. 1991. John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living. Ethics 102, 1 (1991), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/293367 Publisher: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Daniel Araya and Peter Marber (Eds.). 2023. Augmented education in the global age: artificial intelligence and the future of learning and work. Routledge, New York. OCLC: 1372600734.
  12. Blair Attard-Frost. 2023. Queering intelligence: A theory of intelligence as performance and a critique of individual and artificial intelligence. In Queer Reflections on AI. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781003357957-3/queering-intelligence-blair-attard-frost Num Pages: 17.
  13. Rolf K. Baltzersen. 2021. Cultural-Historical Perspectives on Collective Intelligence: Patterns in Problem Solving and Innovation (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108981361
  14. Karen Barad. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, 3 (March 2003), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  15. Abeba Birhane and Olivia Guest. 2021. Towards Decolonising Computational Sciences. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning (2021). https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_3287104_1/component/file_3287105/content
  16. Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AI. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Arlington¡/city¿, ¡state¿VA¡/state¿, ¡country¿USA¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (EAAMO ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3551624.3555290
  17. The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Seoul Republic of Korea, 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533083
  18. Blili-Hamelin, Borhane and Leif Hancox-Li. 2023. Making Intelligence: Ethical Values in IQ and ML Benchmarks. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. June 12–15, 2023, Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3593996
  19. Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 5454–5476. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485
  20. Rishi Bommasani. 2022. Evaluation for Change. (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2212.11670 Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 1.
  21. Edwin G. Boring. 1923. Intelligence as the Tests Test It. New Republic 36 (1923). https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/sup/Boring_1923.html
  22. Nick Bostrom. 2003. Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence. In Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, I Smit (Ed.). Int. Institute of Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics.
  23. Nick Bostrom. 2014. Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies (first edition ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford. OCLC: ocn881706835.
  24. Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and Deployment. (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2011.13416 arXiv Version Number: 3.
  25. Artificial Intelligence and Journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 96, 3 (Sept. 2019), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019859901
  26. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 arXiv:2303.12712 [cs].
  27. Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness. http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708 arXiv:2308.08708 [cs, q-bio].
  28. Stephen Cave. 2020. The Problem with Intelligence: Its Value-Laden History and the Future of AI. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM, New York NY USA, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375813
  29. François Chollet. 2019. On the Measure of Intelligence. (2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1911.01547 arXiv Version Number: 2.
  30. Fast Company. 2010. Wozniak: Could a Computer Make a Cup of Coffee? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MowergwQR5Y [Online; accessed 17-January-2023].
  31. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  32. Ian J. Deary. 2012. Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology 63, 1 (Jan. 2012), 453–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100353
  33. DeepMind. 2022. About. https://web.archive.org/web/20220301060032/https://deepmind.com/about
  34. The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Boston¡/city¿, ¡state¿MA¡/state¿, ¡country¿USA¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (EAAMO ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 37, 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3617694.3623261
  35. On the genealogy of machine learning datasets: A critical history of ImageNet. Big Data & Society 8, 2 (2021).
  36. Bringing the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning Datasets. http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07399 arXiv:2007.07399 [cs].
  37. John Dewey. 1987. Liberalism and Social Action. In Later Works, vol. 11. Southern Illinois University Press.
  38. John Dewey. 2011. Creative Democracy: The Task before Us (Reprint from 1939). In The pragmatism reader: from Peirce through the present. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Oxford.
  39. Ravit Dotan and Smitha Milli. 2020. Value-laden disciplinary shifts in machine learning | Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAT* ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Jan. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3373157
  40. Heather Douglas. 2000. Inductive risk and values in science. Philosophy of science 67, 4 (2000), 559–579.
  41. Ahmad Elabbar. 2023. The curatorial view of assessment and the ethics of scientific advice: Beyond decisional autonomy towards distributive epistemic justice. http://iuhpst.org/media/pdf/Elabbar_IUHPST_Prize_2023.pdf Last accessed: Jan 13, 2023.
  42. D.C. Engelbart. 1962. Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. Technical Report. Stanford Research Institute.
  43. Wendy Nelson Espeland and Mitchell L Stevens. 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual review of sociology 24, 1 (1998), 313–343.
  44. Matthew Festenstein. 2019. Does Dewey Have an “epistemic argument” for Democracy? Contemporary Pragmatism 16, 2-3 (May 2019), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-01602005
  45. Matthew Festenstein. 2023. Dewey’s Political Philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring 2023 ed.), Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (Eds.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/dewey-political/
  46. Nic Fishman and Leif Hancox-Li. 2022. Should attention be all we need? The epistemic and ethical implications of unification in machine learning. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Seoul Republic of Korea, 1516–1527. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533206
  47. Center for AI Safety. [n. d.]. Statement on AI Risk. https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk
  48. University rankings: Evidence and a conceptual framework. Public Administration Review 76, 5 (2016), 790–803.
  49. Miranda Fricker. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=lncSDAAAQBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=intitle:Epistemic+Injustice&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
  50. Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, 1747–1764. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533229
  51. Clark Glymour. 1998. What Went Wrong? Reflections on Science by Observation and The Bell Curve. Philosophy of Science 65, 1 (March 1998), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/392624
  52. Ben Goertzel. 2014. Artificial General Intelligence: Concept, State of the Art, and Future Prospects. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 5, 1 (Dec. 2014), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2014-0001
  53. The architecture of human-like general intelligence. In Theoretical foundations of artificial general intelligence. Springer, 123–144.
  54. Artificial General Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4
  55. Alison Gopnik. [n. d.]. What babies tell us about artificial intelligence. https://psychology.berkeley.edu/news/what-babies-tell-us-about-artificial-intelligence
  56. Alison Gopnik. 2019. AIs Versus Four-Year-Olds. In Possible minds: twenty-five ways of looking at AI, John Brockman (Ed.). Penguin Press, New York.
  57. Ben Green. 2021. Data Science as Political Action: Grounding Data Science in a Politics of Justice. Journal of Social Computing 2, 3 (Sept. 2021), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2021.0029 arXiv:1811.03435 [cs].
  58. Mark Avrum Gubrud. 1997. Nanotechnology and International Security. https://web.archive.org/web/20110529215447/http://www.foresight.org/Conferences/MNT05/Papers/Gubrud/
  59. Alex Hanna and Emily M. Bender. 2023. AI Causes Real Harm. Let’s Focus on That over the End-of-Humanity Hype. Scientific American (2023). https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-need-to-focus-on-ais-real-harms-not-imaginary-existential-risks/ [Online; accessed 17-January-2023].
  60. N. Katherine Hayles. 2017. Unthought: the power of the cognitive nonconscious. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago ; London.
  61. Will Douglas Heaven. 2020. Artificial general intelligence: Are we close, and does it even make sense to try? https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/10/15/1010461/artificial-general-intelligence-robots-ai-agi-deepmind-google-openai/
  62. General intelligence disentangled via a generality metric for natural and artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports 11, 1 (Nov. 2021), 22822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01997-7 Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  63. Debbie Hopkins and Tim Schwanen. 2021. Talking about automated vehicles: What do levels of automation do? Technology in Society 64 (2021), 101488.
  64. David Hume. 1991. A treatise of human nature (2. ed., 8. impr ed.). Clarendon Pr, Oxford.
  65. Edwin Hutchins. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.
  66. Evaluation Gaps in Machine Learning Practice. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Seoul, 1859–1876. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533233
  67. David Ingram. 2024. Meta is pouring money into the creation of human-level artificial intelligence, Zuckerberg says. NBC News (2024). https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/zuckerberg-meta-artificial-general-intelligence-agi-rcna134569
  68. SAE International. 2021. J3016_202104: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/
  69. Kent Johnson. 2016. Realism and Uncertainty of Unobservable Common Causes in Factor Analysis. Noûs 50, 2 (June 2016), 329–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12075
  70. Simon Kirchin (Ed.). 2013. Thick concepts (first edition ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  71. Simon Kirchin. 2017. Thick evaluation (1st ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  72. Hélène Landemore. 2013. Democratic reason: politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton University Press, Princeton ; Oxford.
  73. Hélène Landemore and Jon Elster (Eds.). 2012. Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511846427
  74. Seth Lazar and Alondra Nelson. 2023. AI safety on whose terms? Science 381, 6654 (July 2023), 138–138. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi8982
  75. Yann LeCun. 2022. About the raging debate regarding the significance of recent progress in AI. https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10158256523332143&id=722677142
  76. From neurodiversity to neurodivergence: the role of epistemic and cognitive marginalization. Synthese 199, 5-6 (2021), 12843–12868.
  77. Shane Legg and Marcus Hutter. 2007. A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence. http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3639 arXiv:0706.3639 [cs].
  78. Mariana Lenharo. 2024. AI consciousness: scientists say we urgently need answers. Nature 625, 7994 (Jan. 2024), 226–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-04047-6
  79. Pierre Lévy. 1994. L’Intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace. La Découverte, Paris.
  80. Pierre Lévy. 2010. From social computing to reflexive collective intelligence: The IEML research program. Information Sciences 180, 1 (Jan. 2010), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.08.001
  81. Gary Marcus. 2022. Dear Elon Musk, here are five things you might want to consider about AGI. https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/dear-elon-musk-here-are-five-things?s=r [Online; accessed 17-January-2023].
  82. Gary Marcus. 2023. Reports of the birth of AGI are greatly exaggerated. https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/reports-of-the-birth-of-agi-are-greatly [Online; accessed 16-January-2023].
  83. Disordering Datasets: Sociotechnical Misalignments in AI-Mediated Behavioral Health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555141
  84. A Proposal for The Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. Technical Report. Dartmouth Workshop.
  85. The risks associated with Artificial General Intelligence: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 35, 5 (July 2023), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2021.1964003 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2021.1964003.
  86. Morgan Meaker. 2023. Meet Aleph Alpha, Europe’s Answer to OpenAI. Wired (2023). https://www.wired.com/story/aleph-alpha-europe-openai/ Section: tags.
  87. John Stuart Mill. 2003. On Liberty. Yale University Press.
  88. Dan Milmo. 2023. AI doomsday warnings a distraction from the danger it already poses, warns expert. The Guardian (2023). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/oct/29/ai-doomsday-warnings-a-distraction-from-the-danger-it-already-poses-warns-expert [Online; accessed 22-January-2023].
  89. Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology 33, 4 (Dec. 2020), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8
  90. Levels of AGI: Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02462 arXiv:2311.02462 [cs].
  91. Wim Naudé and Otto Barten. 2023. Artificial General Intelligence: can we avoid the ultimate existential threat? https://oecd.ai/en/wonk/existential-threat
  92. Nils J. Nilsson. 2005. Human-Level Artificial Intelligence? Be Serious! AI Magazine 26, 4 (Dec. 2005), 68–68. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v26i4.1850 Number: 4.
  93. NIST. 2023. AI Risk Management Framework: AI RMF (1.0). Technical Report NIST AI 100-1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. error: NIST AI 100–1 pages. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
  94. Ilan Noy and Tomáš Uher. 2022. Four New Horsemen of an Apocalypse? Solar Flares, Super-volcanoes, Pandemics, and Artificial Intelligence. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change 6, 2 (July 2022), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-022-00105-x
  95. Future of Life Institute. 2023. Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/
  96. OpenAI. 2018. OpenAI Charter. Technical Report. OpenAI. https://openai.com/charter
  97. Jason W Osborne. 2001. Testing stereotype threat: Does anxiety explain race and sex differences in achievement? Contemporary educational psychology 26, 3 (2001), 291–310.
  98. Elizabeth Pellicano and Jacquiline den Houting. 2022. Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 63, 4 (April 2022), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534
  99. Fabienne Peter. 2017. Political Legitimacy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.), Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (Eds.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  100. Michael A. Peters and Richard Heraud. 2015. Toward a political theory of social innovation: collective intelligence and the co-creation of social goods. 3, 3 (2015), 7–23. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/9569 Accepted: 2015-08-27T04:47:37Z.
  101. Karl Popper. 2013. Knowledge and the body-mind problem: In defence of interaction. Routledge.
  102. Theodore M Porter. 1996. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
  103. Institutionalizing ethics in AI through broader impact requirements. Nature Machine Intelligence 3, 2 (Feb. 2021), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00298-y
  104. Hilary Putnam. 2011. A Reconsideration of Deweyan Democracy (Reprint from 1989). In The pragmatism reader: from Peirce through the present. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Oxford. Reprint of (1989). A Reconsideration of Deweyan Democracy. Southern California Law Review, 63, 1671.
  105. Ken Richardson. 2017. Genes, brains, and human potential: The science and ideology of intelligence. Columbia University Press.
  106. Stuart J. Russell. 2019. Human compatible: artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking, New York?
  107. Avoiding negative side effects due to incomplete knowledge of AI systems. AI Magazine 42, 4 (2022), 62–71.
  108. Do datasets have politics? Disciplinary values in computer vision dataset development. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW (2021), 1–37.
  109. Kate C.S. Schmidt. 2019. Epistemic Justice and Epistemic Participation. Ph. D. Dissertation. Washington University in St. Louis. https://doi.org/10.7936/S8G9-5W13
  110. Amy M. Schmitter. 2021. 17th and 18th Century Theories of Emotions. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  111. Eric Schwitzgebel and Mara Garza. 2015. A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences: Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences. Midwest Studies In Philosophy 39, 1 (Sept. 2015), 98–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12032
  112. John R. Searle. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 3 (Sept. 1980), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
  113. Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Atlanta GA USA, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
  114. Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction. http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05791 arXiv:2210.05791 [cs].
  115. Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107–171. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073
  116. Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learning. arXiv:2007.02423 [cs] (Aug. 2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.02423 arXiv: 2007.02423.
  117. Andrew Smart. 2015. Beyond zero and one: machines, psychedelics, and consciousness. OR Books, New York. OCLC: 930340933.
  118. Daniel Steel. 2010. Epistemic values and the argument from inductive risk. Philosophy of science 77, 1 (2010), 14–34.
  119. Mustafa Suleyman and Michael Bhaskar. 2023. The Coming Wave. Crown, New York.
  120. Christopher Summerfield. 2023. Natural general intelligence: how understanding the brain can help us build AI (first edition ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, NY.
  121. Frameworks for Collective Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Surveys 53, 1 (Jan. 2021), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368986
  122. Rich Sutton. 2019. The bitter lesson. http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html
  123. Rob Toews. 2022. Reflecting On ‘Artificial General Intelligence’ And AI Sentience. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2022/07/24/on-artificial-general-intelligence-ai-sentience-and-large-language-models/
  124. Alan M Turing. 2012. Computing machinery and intelligence (1950). The Essential Turing: the Ideas That Gave Birth to the Computer Age (2012), 433–464.
  125. Salomé Viljoen. 2021. A Relational Theory of Data Governance. The Yale Law Journal (2021).
  126. Russell T. Warne and Cassidy Burningham. 2019. Spearman’s g found in 31 non-Western nations: Strong evidence that g is a universal phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin 145, 3 (March 2019), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000184
  127. Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systems. http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11986 arXiv:2310.11986 [cs].
  128. Joseph Weizenbaum. 1976. Computer power and human reason: from judgment to calculation. Freeman, San Francisco.
  129. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109, 1 (1980), 121–136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652 Publisher: The MIT Press.
  130. Why we should have seen that coming: comments on Microsoft’s tay” experiment,” and wider implications. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 47, 3 (2017), 54–64.
  131. Steve Wozniak. 2010. Could a Computer Make a Cup of Coffee? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MowergwQR5Y
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Borhane Blili-Hamelin (10 papers)
  2. Leif Hancox-Li (7 papers)
  3. Andrew Smart (20 papers)