Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Rank, Pack, or Approve: Voting Methods in Participatory Budgeting (2401.12423v4)

Published 23 Jan 2024 in cs.CY

Abstract: Participatory budgeting is a popular method to engage residents in budgeting decisions by local governments. The Stanford Participatory Budgeting platform is an online platform that has been used to engage residents in more than 150 budgeting processes. We present a data set with anonymized budget opinions from these processes with K-approval, K-ranking or knapsack primary ballots. For a subset of the voters, it includes paired votes with a different elicitation method in the same process. This presents a unique data set, as the voters, projects and setting are all related to real-world decisions that the voters have an actual interest in. With data from primary ballots we find that while ballot complexity (number of projects to choose from, number of projects to select and ballot length) is correlated with a higher median time spent by voters, it is not correlated with a higher abandonment rate. We use vote pairs with different voting methods to analyze the effect of voting methods on the cost of selected projects, more comprehensively than was previously possible. In most elections, voters selected significantly more expensive projects using K-approval than using knapsack, although we also find a small number of examples with a significant effect in the opposite direction. This effect happens at the aggregate level as well as for individual voters, and is influenced both by the implicit constraints of the voting method and the explicit constraints of the voting interface. Finally, we validate the use of K-ranking elicitation to offer a paper alternative for knapsack voting.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(3): 1–22.
  2. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216–224.
  3. Participatory Budgeting: Models and Approaches. In Rudas, T.; and Péli, G., eds., Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science, 215–236. Cham: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-54935-0 978-3-030-54936-7. Series Title: Computational Social Sciences.
  4. The journey of participatory budgeting: a systematic literature review and future research directions. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 002085232210789.
  5. Preference Elicitation For Participatory Budgeting. Journal of the ACM, 1(1): 27.
  6. Callahan, K. 2007a. Citizen Participation: Models and Methods. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11): 1179–1196.
  7. Elements of effective governance: measurement, accountability and participation. Number 126 in Public administration and public policy. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-8493-7096-0. OCLC: ocm69013806.
  8. Towards increasing citizen engagement in participatory budgeting digital tools. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 1–2. ACM Press. ISBN 978-1-4503-6526-0.
  9. de Borda, J.-C. 1784. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences, Année 1781: 31–34.
  10. Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3): 437–447.
  11. The Core of the Participatory Budgeting Problem. In Cai, Y.; and Vetta, A., eds., Web and Internet Economics, volume 10123, 384–399. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-662-54109-8 978-3-662-54110-4. Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  12. Participatory Budgeting Design for the Real World. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37.
  13. Participatory budgets in Brazil and Portugal: comparing patterns of dissemination. Policy Studies, 41(6): 603–622.
  14. Fung, A. 2006. Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1): 66–75.
  15. Who is in Your Top Three? In HCOMP 2019.
  16. Participatory Budgeting Preferences Data Set.
  17. Advertising for Demographically Fair Outcomes. In ArXiv, Presented at: 4th Workshop on Mechanism Design for Social Good. Online. ArXiv: 2006.03983.
  18. Knapsack Voting for Participatory Budgeting. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 7(2): 1–27.
  19. Low Sample Complexity Participatory Budgeting. In Etessami, K.; Feige, U.; and Puppis, G., eds., 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023), volume 261 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), 70:1–70:20. Dagstuhl, Germany: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. ISBN 978-3-95977-278-5.
  20. Public Spending, by the People. Participatory Budgeting in the United States and Canada in 2014-2015. Technical report, Public Agenda.
  21. Engineering software assemblies for participatory democracy: the participatory budgeting use case. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, 573–582. Austin Texas: ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-4205-6.
  22. Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting. Political Behavior, 45: 3–32.
  23. BudgetMap: Engaging Taxpayers in the Issue-Driven Classification of a Government Budget. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1028–1039. San Francisco California USA: ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-3592-8.
  24. Langton, S. 1979. American citizen participation: A deep-rooted tradition. National Civic Review, 68(8): 403–422.
  25. Budgeting for Equity: How Can Participatory Budgeting Advance Equity in the United States? Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 12(2).
  26. The Modes of Participation: A Revised Frame for Identifying and Analyzing Participatory Budgeting Practices. Administration & Society, 51(8): 1254–1281.
  27. Auditing for Core Stability in Participatory Budgeting. In Hansen, K. A.; Liu, T. X.; and Malekian, A., eds., Web and Internet Economics, volume 13778, 292–310. Cham: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-031-22831-5 978-3-031-22832-2. Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  28. Proportional Participatory Budgeting with Additive Utilities. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021), volume 34, 12726–12737. Curran Associates, Inc.
  29. Decide Madrid: A Spanish best practice on e-participation. In Randma-Liiv, T.; and Lember, V., eds., Engaging Citizens in Policy Making. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1-80037-436-2 978-1-80037-435-5.
  30. The (Computational) Social Choice Take on Indivisible Participatory Budgeting. ArXiv:2303.00621.
  31. Optimising participatory budget allocation: the Decidim use case. Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, 319: 193–202.
  32. Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges: Participatory budgeting in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1): 164–178.
  33. Society, T. D. 2016. Digital tools and Scotland’s Participatory Budgeting programme. Technical report, The Democratic Society.
  34. Pabulib: A Participatory Budgeting Library. ArXiv:2012.06539.
  35. Su, C. 2017. From Porto Alegre to New York City: Participatory Budgeting and Democracy. New Political Science, 39(1): 67–75.
  36. van Dijk, J. A. 2012. Digital Democracy: Vision and Reality. In Snellen, I. T. M.; Thaens, M.; and Donk, W. B. H. J. v. d., eds., Public administration in the information age: revisited, number volume 19 in Innovation and the public sector, 49–62. Amsterdam ; Washington, DC: IOS Press. ISBN 978-1-61499-136-6.
  37. Wang, X. 2001. Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Cities. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(4): 322.
  38. Participatory Budgeting: An Evidence Review. Technical report, Public Policy Institute for Wales.
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets