Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
132 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

HG3-NeRF: Hierarchical Geometric, Semantic, and Photometric Guided Neural Radiance Fields for Sparse View Inputs (2401.11711v1)

Published 22 Jan 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) have garnered considerable attention as a paradigm for novel view synthesis by learning scene representations from discrete observations. Nevertheless, NeRF exhibit pronounced performance degradation when confronted with sparse view inputs, consequently curtailing its further applicability. In this work, we introduce Hierarchical Geometric, Semantic, and Photometric Guided NeRF (HG3-NeRF), a novel methodology that can address the aforementioned limitation and enhance consistency of geometry, semantic content, and appearance across different views. We propose Hierarchical Geometric Guidance (HGG) to incorporate the attachment of Structure from Motion (SfM), namely sparse depth prior, into the scene representations. Different from direct depth supervision, HGG samples volume points from local-to-global geometric regions, mitigating the misalignment caused by inherent bias in the depth prior. Furthermore, we draw inspiration from notable variations in semantic consistency observed across images of different resolutions and propose Hierarchical Semantic Guidance (HSG) to learn the coarse-to-fine semantic content, which corresponds to the coarse-to-fine scene representations. Experimental results demonstrate that HG3-NeRF can outperform other state-of-the-art methods on different standard benchmarks and achieve high-fidelity synthesis results for sparse view inputs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (61)
  1. Building rome in a day. Communications of the ACM, 54(10):105–112, 2011.
  2. Modeling facial geometry using compositional vaes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3877–3886, 2018.
  3. Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5470–5479, 2022.
  4. Mvsnerf: Fast generalizable radiance field reconstruction from multi-view stereo. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 14124–14133, 2021.
  5. Learning implicit fields for generative shape modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5939–5948, 2019.
  6. Stereo radiance fields (srf): Learning view synthesis for sparse views of novel scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7911–7920, 2021.
  7. Gaussian activated neural radiance fields for high fidelity reconstruction and pose estimation. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXIII, pages 264–280. Springer, 2022.
  8. 3d-r2n2: A unified approach for single and multi-view 3d object reconstruction. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part VIII 14, pages 628–644. Springer, 2016.
  9. Cvxnet: Learnable convex decomposition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 31–44, 2020.
  10. Depth-supervised nerf: Fewer views and faster training for free. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12882–12891, 2022.
  11. Neural scene representation and rendering. Science, 360(6394):1204–1210, 2018.
  12. A point set generation network for 3d object reconstruction from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 605–613, 2017.
  13. Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5501–5510, 2022.
  14. A papier-mâché approach to learning 3d surface generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 216–224, 2018.
  15. Single-view view synthesis in the wild with learned adaptive multiplane images. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings, pages 1–8, 2022.
  16. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge university press, 2003.
  17. Putting nerf on a diet: Semantically consistent few-shot view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5885–5894, 2021.
  18. Codenerf: Disentangled neural radiance fields for object categories. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 12949–12958, 2021.
  19. Large scale multi-view stereopsis evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 406–413, 2014.
  20. Geonerf: Generalizing nerf with geometry priors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18365–18375, 2022.
  21. Infonerf: Ray entropy minimization for few-shot neural volume rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12912–12921, 2022.
  22. Exp-gan: 3d-aware facial image generation with expression control. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3812–3827, 2022.
  23. Barf: Bundle-adjusting neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5741–5751, 2021.
  24. Learning to infer implicit surfaces without 3d supervision. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  25. Neural rays for occlusion-aware image-based rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7824–7833, 2022.
  26. Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4460–4470, 2019.
  27. Implicit surface representations as layers in neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4743–4752, 2019.
  28. Local light field fusion: Practical view synthesis with prescriptive sampling guidelines. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 38(4):1–14, 2019.
  29. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In European conference on computer vision, pages 405–421. Springer, 2020.
  30. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 41(4):1–15, 2022.
  31. Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system. IEEE transactions on robotics, 31(5):1147–1163, 2015.
  32. Orb-slam2: An open-source slam system for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras. IEEE transactions on robotics, 33(5):1255–1262, 2017.
  33. Polygen: An autoregressive generative model of 3d meshes. In International conference on machine learning, pages 7220–7229. PMLR, 2020.
  34. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021.
  35. Regnerf: Regularizing neural radiance fields for view synthesis from sparse inputs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5480–5490, 2022.
  36. Differentiable volumetric rendering: Learning implicit 3d representations without 3d supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3504–3515, 2020.
  37. Stylesdf: High-resolution 3d-consistent image and geometry generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13503–13513, 2022.
  38. Bokehme: When neural rendering meets classical rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16283–16292, 2022.
  39. Shape as points: A differentiable poisson solver. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:13032–13044, 2021.
  40. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  41. Sharf: Shape-conditioned radiance fields from a single view. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8948–8958. PMLR, 2021.
  42. Structure-from-motion revisited. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4104–4113, 2016.
  43. Mixnerf: Modeling a ray with mixture density for novel view synthesis from sparse inputs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08788, 2023.
  44. Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:7462–7473, 2020.
  45. Deepvoxels: Learning persistent 3d feature embeddings. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2437–2446, 2019.
  46. Self-improving multiplane-to-layer images for novel view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 4309–4318, 2023.
  47. Light field neural rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8269–8279, 2022.
  48. Direct voxel grid optimization: Super-fast convergence for radiance fields reconstruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5459–5469, 2022.
  49. Block-nerf: Scalable large scene neural view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8248–8258, 2022.
  50. Neus: Learning neural implicit surfaces by volume rendering for multi-view reconstruction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:27171–27183, 2021.
  51. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004.
  52. Nerfingmvs: Guided optimization of neural radiance fields for indoor multi-view stereo. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5610–5619, 2021.
  53. 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1912–1920, 2015.
  54. Bungeenerf: Progressive neural radiance field for extreme multi-scale scene rendering. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXII, pages 106–122. Springer, 2022.
  55. Temporal-mpi: Enabling multi-plane images for dynamic scene modelling via temporal basis learning. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XV, pages 323–338. Springer, 2022.
  56. Sinnerf: Training neural radiance fields on complex scenes from a single image. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXII, pages 736–753. Springer, 2022.
  57. 3d-aware image synthesis via learning structural and textural representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18430–18439, 2022.
  58. pixelnerf: Neural radiance fields from one or few images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4578–4587, 2021.
  59. Monosdf: Exploring monocular geometric cues for neural implicit surface reconstruction. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022), 2022.
  60. Nerf++: Analyzing and improving neural radiance fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07492, 2020.
  61. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 586–595, 2018.
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a hierarchical guidance mechanism that leverages depth priors and semantic features to generate photorealistic scene representations from sparse views.
  • It utilizes a local-to-global sampling strategy for geometric guidance and incremental semantic supervision to mitigate misalignment and enhance detail reconstruction.
  • Experimental results demonstrate that HG3-NeRF outperforms state-of-the-art methods with realistic rendering and improved semantic consistency in real-world scenarios.

Introduction

Novel View Synthesis (NVS) is essential for creating photorealistic images from new perspectives not originally captured by the input views. Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) have emerged as a state-of-the-art framework for this task, providing impressive results by learning continuous scene representations. Despite the success, NeRF's dependence on densely sampled views for reliable performance limits its practicality in real-world applications where data acquisition is constrained. The essence of the Hierarchical Geometric, Semantic, and Photometric Guided NeRF (HG³-NeRF) technique lies in its ability to effectively utilize sparse view inputs, alleviating NeRF’s limitation and enhancing view synthesis quality through innovative hierarchical guidance strategies.

Related Works and Motivation

Earlier methodologies for addressing NVS from sparse views can be broadly categorized into pre-training methods that leverage large datasets to train a model before fine-tuning on target scenes, and per-scene optimization methods that optimize the model from scratch for each scenario. Both strategies exhibit limitations, such as dependency on dataset quality or a lack of geometric supervision, resulting in geometric misalignment. The HG³-NeRF approach sidesteps these concerns by introducing a novel hierarchical geometric guidance mechanism (HGG) and hierarchical semantic guidance (HSG), utilizing sparse depth priors and semantic content learning for consistent scene representation across varied resolutions.

Hierarchical Geometric and Semantic Guidance

HGG and HSG are the fundament of HG³-NeRF's robustness against input view sparsity. Inspired by the potential bias from direct depth supervision, HGG employs a local-to-global volume sampling strategy that uses depth priors as guidance rather than as an exact constraint, thereby circumventing geometric misalignment. HSG addresses the challenge posed by semantic consistency across images with different resolutions. The method initially supervises using features from down-sampled images, which match the blurred, low-frequency content of images generated early in training. As the training progresses and the images gain detail, HSG incrementally incorporates finer features.

Experimental Results

The HG³-NeRF model was rigorously tested against standard benchmarks, outperforming other state-of-the-art techniques. Notably, by employing HGG, the model showcased the capability to refine scene representations under sparse input conditions significantly. It enabled realistic synthesis results that maintained geometric consistency without succumbing to misalignments introduced by depth priors. The integration of HSG enhanced semantic consistency across reconstructions, adding to the model's robustness. The combination of HGG and HSG allowed the model to sidestep the use of the Normalized Device Coordinate (NDC) space, traditionally utilized in NVS tasks, and operate effectively in real-world space for forward-facing scenarios.

Conclusion and Future Directions

HG³-NeRF marks a noteworthy progression in the field of NVS, particularly for scenarios constrained by sparse input views. The advent of hierarchical geometric and semantic strategies unlocks new possibilities, mitigating traditional reliance on dense input data and intricate pre-processing stages. Despite these advances, the requirement for accurately estimated camera poses remains a challenge and highlights a proximate area for future exploration — refining NeRF optimization capabilities further when confronted with noisy camera poses and limited input data.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com