Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
89 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
50 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
29 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
28 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
90 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
55 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
468 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
207 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Small Even Covers, Locally Decodable Codes and Restricted Subgraphs of Edge-Colored Kikuchi Graphs (2401.11590v2)

Published 21 Jan 2024 in cs.CC and math.CO

Abstract: Given a $k$-uniform hypergraph $H$ on $n$ vertices, an even cover in $H$ is a collection of hyperedges that touch each vertex an even number of times. Even covers are a generalization of cycles in graphs and are equivalent to linearly dependent subsets of a system of linear equations modulo $2$. As a result, they arise naturally in the context of well-studied questions in coding theory and refuting unsatisfiable $k$-SAT formulas. Analogous to the irregular Moore bound of Alon, Hoory, and Linial (2002), in 2008, Feige conjectured an extremal trade-off between the number of hyperedges and the length of the smallest even cover in a $k$-uniform hypergraph. This conjecture was recently settled up to a multiplicative logarithmic factor in the number of hyperedges (Guruswami, Kothari, and Manohar 2022 and Hsieh, Kothari, and Mohanty 2023). These works introduce the new technique that relates hypergraph even covers to cycles in the associated Kikuchi graphs. Their analysis of these Kikuchi graphs, especially for odd $k$, is rather involved and relies on matrix concentration inequalities. In this work, we give a simple and purely combinatorial argument that recovers the best-known bound for Feige's conjecture for even $k$. We also introduce a novel variant of a Kikuchi graph which together with this argument improves the logarithmic factor in the best-known bounds for odd $k$. As an application of our ideas, we also give a purely combinatorial proof of the improved lower bounds (Alrabiah, Guruswami, Kothari and Manohar, 2023) on 3-query binary linear locally decodable codes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Essentially tight bounds for rainbow cycles in proper edge-colourings. arXiv:2309.04460, 2023.
  2. N. Alon, U. Feige. On the power of two, three and four probes. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2009, New York, NY, USA, January 4-6, 2009, 346–354, 2009.
  3. N. Alon, S. Hoory and N. Linial. The Moore Bound for Irregular Graphs. Graphs Comb., 18(1):53–57, 2002.
  4. A Near-Cubic Lower Bound for 3-Query Locally Decodable Codes from Semirandom CSP Refutation. Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2023, Orlando, FL, USA, June 20-23, 2023, ACM, 1438–1448, 2023.
  5. Z. Dvir. Incidence Theorems and Their Applications. arXiv:1208.5073, 2012.
  6. Z. Dvir. Locally Decodable Codes. Lecture Notes, Princeton University, 2016.
  7. K. Efremenko. 3-query locally decodable codes of subexponential length. Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2009, Bethesda, MD, USA, May 31 - June 2, 2009, ACM, 39–44, 2009.
  8. U. Feige. Small linear dependencies for binary vectors of low weight. Building Bridges: Between Mathematics and Computer Science, Springer, 283–307, 2008.
  9. U. Feige, J. H. Kim and E. Ofek. Witnesses for non-satisfiability of dense random 3CNF formulas. 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2006), 21-24 October 2006, Berkeley, California, USA, Proceedings, IEEE Computer Society, 497–508, 2006.
  10. U. Feige and T. Wagner. Generalized girth problems in graphs and hypergraphs. preprint.
  11. Lower bounds for linear locally decodable codes and private information retrieval. Computational Complexity, 15(3):263–296, 2006.
  12. V. Guruswami, P. Kothari and P. Manohar. Algorithms and certificates for Boolean CSP refutation: smoothed is no harder than random. STOC ’22: 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, Rome, Italy, June 20 - 24, 2022, ACM, 678–689, 2022.
  13. T. Hsieh, P. Kothari and S. Mohanty. A simple and sharper proof of the hypergraph Moore bound. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2023, Florence, Italy, January 22-25, 2023, 2324–2344, 2023.
  14. Rainbow Turán problems. Combin. Probab. Comput., 16(1):109–126, 2007.
  15. I. Kerenidis and R. Wolf. Exponential lower bound for 2-query locally decodable codes via a quantum argument. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 69(3):395–420, 2004.
  16. P. Kothari and P. Manohar. An Exponential Lower Bound for Linear 3-Query Locally Correctable Codes. arXiv:2311.00558, 2023.
  17. F. Lazebnik, V. Ustimenko and A. Woldar. A new series of dense graphs of high girth. Bulletin of the AMS, 32:73–79, 1995.
  18. R. Montgomery. A proof of the Ryser-Brualdi-Stein conjecture for large even n𝑛nitalic_n. arXiv:2310.19779, 2023.
  19. R. Montgomery, A. Pokrovskiy and B. Sudakov. A proof of Ringel’s conjecture. Geom. Funct. Anal., 31(3):663–720, 2021.
  20. A. Naor and J. Verstraëte. Parity check matrices and product representations of squares. Combinatorica, 28(2):163–185, 2008.
  21. T. Sanders. On a theorem of Shkredov. Online J. Anal. Comb., 5:4, 2010.
  22. S. Yekhanin. Towards 3-query locally decodable codes of subexponential length. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 55(1):1–16, 2008.
  23. S. Yekhanin. Locally Decodable Codes and Private Information Retrieval Schemes. Information Security and Cryptography, Springer, 2010.
  24. S. Yekhanin. Locally decodable codes. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, Now Publishers, Inc., 6(3):139–255, 2012.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com