Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Nigel -- Mechatronic Design and Robust Sim2Real Control of an Over-Actuated Autonomous Vehicle (2401.11542v4)

Published 21 Jan 2024 in cs.RO, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: Simulation to reality (sim2real) transfer from a dynamics and controls perspective usually involves re-tuning or adapting the designed algorithms to suit real-world operating conditions, which often violates the performance guarantees established originally. This work presents a generalizable framework for achieving reliable sim2real transfer of autonomy-oriented control systems using multi-model multi-objective robust optimal control synthesis, which lends well to uncertainty handling and disturbance rejection with theoretical guarantees. Particularly, this work is centered around a novel actuation-redundant scaled autonomous vehicle called Nigel, with independent all-wheel drive and independent all-wheel steering architecture, whose enhanced configuration space bodes well for robust control applications. To this end, we present the mechatronic design, dynamics modeling, parameter identification, and robust stabilizing as well as tracking control of Nigel using the proposed framework, with exhaustive experimentation and benchmarking in simulation as well as real-world settings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. C. V. Samak, T. V. Samak, and S. Kandhasamy, “Control Strategies for Autonomous Vehicles,” in Autonomous Driving and Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS).   CRC Press, 2021, pp. 37–86.
  2. B. Goldfain, P. Drews, C. You, M. Barulic, O. Velev, P. Tsiotras, and J. M. Rehg, “AutoRally: An Open Platform for Aggressive Autonomous Driving,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 26–55, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00678
  3. Automatic Control Laboratory, ETH Zürich, “ORCA (Optimal RC Racing) Project,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://control.ee.ethz.ch/research/team-projects/autonomous-rc-car-racing.html
  4. T. K. et al., “Design and Development of the Delft Scaled Vehicle: A Platform for Autonomous Driving Tests,” Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, Bachelor’s Thesis, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.erwinrietveld.com/assets/docs/BEP11_DSCS_Paper_Final.pdf
  5. J. Pappas, C. H. Yuan, C. S. Lu, N. Nassar, A. Miller, S. van Leeuwen, and F. Borrelli, “Berkeley Autonomous Race Car (BARC),” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://sites.google.com/site/berkeleybarcproject
  6. HyphaROS Workshop, “HyphaROS Racecar,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/Hypha-ROS/hypharos_racecar
  7. Donkey Community, “An Open-Source DIY Self-Driving Platform for Small-Scale Cars,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.donkeycar.com
  8. Quanser Consulting Inc., “QCar - A Sensor-Rich Autonomous Vehicle,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.quanser.com/products/qcar
  9. Amazon Web Services, “AWS DeepRacer,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://aws.amazon.com/deepracer
  10. Robotis Inc., “TurtleBot3,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://emanual.robotis.com/docs/en/platform/turtlebot3/overview/
  11. B. Bae and D.-H. Lee, “Design of a Four-Wheel Steering Mobile Robot Platform and Adaptive Steering Control for Manual Operation,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/16/3511
  12. J. Park and Y. Park, “Multiple-Actuator Fault Isolation Using a Minimal L1-Norm Solution with Applications in Overactuated Electric Vehicles,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 6, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/6/2144
  13. C. Samak, T. Samak, and V. Krovi, “Towards Mechatronics Approach of System Design, Verification and Validation for Autonomous Vehicles,” in 2023 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2023, pp. 1208–1213.
  14. T. Samak, C. Samak, S. Kandhasamy, V. Krovi, and M. Xie, “AutoDRIVE: A Comprehensive, Flexible and Integrated Digital Twin Ecosystem for Autonomous Driving Research & Education,” Robotics, vol. 12, no. 3, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/12/3/77
  15. T. V. Samak and C. V. Samak, “AutoDRIVE - Technical Report,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08475
  16. T. V. Samak, C. V. Samak, and M. Xie, “AutoDRIVE Simulator: A Simulator for Scaled Autonomous Vehicle Research and Education,” in 2021 2nd International Conference on Control, Robotics and Intelligent System, ser. CCRIS’21.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 1–5. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3483845.3483846
  17. T. V. Samak and C. V. Samak, “AutoDRIVE Simulator - Technical Report,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07022
  18. Z. Zhang, C. Yang, W. Zhang, Y. Xu, Y. Peng, and M. Chi, “Motion Control of a 4WS4WD Path-Following Vehicle: Dynamics-Based Steering and Driving Models,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2021, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8861159
  19. S. Zhu, B. Wei, D. Liu, H. Chen, X. Huang, Y. Zheng, and W. Wei, “A Dynamics Coordinated Control System for 4WD-4WS Electric Vehicles,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/22/3731
  20. J. R. Kolodziej, “Adaptive Rear-Wheel Steering Control of a Four-Wheel Vehicle Over Uncertain Terrain,” ser. Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, vol. 1, 10 2012, pp. 857–866. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2012-MOVIC2012-8603
  21. M. Schwartz, F. Siebenrock, and S. Hohmann, “Model Predictive Control Allocation of an Over-Actuated Electric Vehicle with Single Wheel Actuators,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 162–169, 2019, 10th IFAC Symposium on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles IAV 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896319303969
  22. Q. Tan, P. Dai, Z. Zhang, and J. Katupitiya, “MPC and PSO Based Control Methodology for Path Tracking of 4WS4WD Vehicles,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 6, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/6/1000
  23. J.-E. Moseberg and G. Roppenecker, “Robust Cascade Control for the Horizontal Motion of a Vehicle with Single-Wheel Actuators,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1742–1758, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1081954
  24. M. Li, Y. Jia, and T. Lei, “Path Tracking of Varying-Velocity 4WS Autonomous Vehicles under Tire Force Friction Ellipse Constraints,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 173, p. 104621, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889024000046
  25. J. Ackermann and W. Sienel, “Robust Yaw Damping of Cars with Front and Rear Wheel Steering,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 1993.
  26. H. Zhang, X. Zhang, and J. Wang, “Robust Gain-Scheduling Energy-to-Peak Control of Vehicle Lateral Dynamics Stabilisation,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 309–340, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.879190
  27. J. P. Redondo, B. L. Boada, and V. Díaz, “LMI-Based H-Infinity Controller of Vehicle Roll Stability Control Systems with Input and Output Delays,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 23, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/23/7850
  28. A. Y. Babawuro, N. M. Tahir, M. Muhammed, and A. U. Sambo, “Optimized State Feedback Control of Quarter Car Active Suspension System Based on LMI Algorithm,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1502, no. 1, p. 012019, Mar 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1502/1/012019
  29. Y.-e. Mao, Y. Zheng, Y. Jing, G. M. Dimirovski, and S. Hang, “An LMI Approach to Slip Ratio Control of Vehicle Antilock Braking Systems,” in 2009 American Control Conference, 2009, pp. 3350–3354.
  30. M. Schwartz, T. Rudolf, and S. Hohmann, “Robust Position and Velocity Tracking Control of a Four-wheel Drive and Four-wheel Steered Electric Vehicle,” in 2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), 2020, pp. 415–422.
  31. C. Samak, T. Samak, and V. Krovi, “Towards Sim2Real Transfer of Autonomy Algorithms using AutoDRIVE Ecosystem,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 277–282, 2023, 3rd Modeling, Estimation and Control Conference MECC 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896323023704
  32. P. Apkarian, P. Gahinet, and G. Becker, “Self-Scheduled H-Infinity Control of Linear Parameter-Varying Systems: A Design Example,” Automatica, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1251–1261, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000510989500038X
  33. Y. Li, “Robust Control-LMI Method,” 2002.
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper proposes a novel over-actuated vehicle design featuring an independent 4WD4WS system to enhance fault tolerance and maneuverability.
  • It introduces both nonlinear and linearized dynamic models integrated with a mixed H2-H∞ robust control synthesis to effectively manage uncertainty.
  • Experimental results benchmark the approach against conventional controls, demonstrating significant improvements in mitigating sim2real discrepancies.

Essay on "Nigel - Mechatronic Design and Robust Sim2Real Control of an Over-Actuated Autonomous Vehicle"

The paper "Nigel - Mechatronic Design and Robust Sim2Real Control of an Over-Actuated Autonomous Vehicle" presents a compelling examination of sim2real transfer challenges in autonomous vehicle control, introducing an innovative framework for reliable transfer under conditions of uncertainty and disturbances. The authors propose a novel actuation-redundant scaled autonomous vehicle, Nigel, equipped with independent all-wheel drive and steering capabilities. This configuration significantly expands the control application's configuration space, thus contributing to robust sim2real performance.

Mechatronic Design and Configuration

Nigel showcases a robust mechatronic architecture featuring a four-wheel drive and steering system (4WD4WS). This actuation configuration offers distinct benefits in terms of redundancy and independent wheel control, enhancing fault tolerance and maneuverability. Notable is the design's small form factor at a 1:14 scale, allowing comprehensive sensor integration. The embodiment of these factors in Nigel underscores the paper's focus on hardware-software co-design—a necessary shift in the current era of autonomous systems development.

Dynamics Modeling and Control Synthesis

The paper advances the discussion on vehicle dynamics by presenting both nonlinear and linearized models specific to the 4WD4WS architecture. The nonlinear model is deduced from foundational works, which the authors adeptly linearize for control synthesis. This systematic derivation transitions into a polytopic linear parameter-varying model, accommodating parameters like frictional coefficients as sources of uncertainty. The methodological rigor in parameter identification from empirical data bolsters the reliability of this modeling approach.

Drawing on multi-model multi-objective control theory, the authors employ mixed H2H_2-HH_\infty strategies within a robust control framework. This approach optimally balances disturbance rejection with performance tradeoffs, thereby placing emphasis on DD-stability guarantees. Such a framework not only aids sim2real transfer but also shields against real-world dynamical disruptions, which are paramount for practical vehicle autonomy deployment.

Experimental Validation and Benchmarking

The experimental analysis offers crucial insights into the efficacy of the proposed control framework. Benchmarking against both a traditional control scheme and an open-loop system highlights superior performance, especially in terms of error metrics across standard maneuvers. The independent 4WD4WS configuration inherently supports more nuanced control strategies, evidenced by enhanced HH_\infty and H2H_2 performance outcomes as compared to conventional architectures. Through these results, the authors propose an advanced control strategy capable of navigating significant sim2real discrepancies.

Implications and Future Work

The implications of this research extend to both theoretical advances in robust control synthesis and practical developments in vehicle autonomy. The proposed framework not only mitigates the sim2real gap via robust control but also potentiates further research into vehicular digital twins, autonomy stacks, and fault-tolerant systems. The anticipated future work involves the exploration of mixed sensitivity loop-shaping and full-scale vehicular deployments, which could lead towards more resilient and adaptable autonomous systems.

In summary, this paper significantly contributes to the discourse of autonomous vehicle control. Through rigorous design and control synthesis methodologies, the authors offer substantial improvements in sim2real transfer reliability, pushing the boundaries of vehicle control theory and practice. Nigel, as a prototype, not only substantiates theoretical claims but also serves as a versatile foundation for future innovations in autonomous mobility systems.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com