Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TreeMIL: A Multi-instance Learning Framework for Time Series Anomaly Detection with Inexact Supervision (2401.11235v1)

Published 20 Jan 2024 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays a vital role in various domains such as healthcare, networks, and industry. Considering labels are crucial for detection but difficult to obtain, we turn to TSAD with inexact supervision: only series-level labels are provided during the training phase, while point-level anomalies are predicted during the testing phase. Previous works follow a traditional multi-instance learning (MIL) approach, which focuses on encouraging high anomaly scores at individual time steps. However, time series anomalies are not only limited to individual point anomalies, they can also be collective anomalies, typically exhibiting abnormal patterns over subsequences. To address the challenge of collective anomalies, in this paper, we propose a tree-based MIL framework (TreeMIL). We first adopt an N-ary tree structure to divide the entire series into multiple nodes, where nodes at different levels represent subsequences with different lengths. Then, the subsequence features are extracted to determine the presence of collective anomalies. Finally, we calculate point-level anomaly scores by aggregating features from nodes at different levels. Experiments conducted on seven public datasets and eight baselines demonstrate that TreeMIL achieves an average 32.3% improvement in F1- score compared to previous state-of-the-art methods. The code is available at https://github.com/fly-orange/TreeMIL.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. S. Qin, Y. Luo, and G. Tao, “Memory-augmented u-transformer for multivariate time series anomaly detection,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).   IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  2. M. Jiang, C. Hou, A. Zheng, X. Hu, S. Han, H. Huang, X. He, P. S. Yu, and Y. Zhao, “Weakly supervised anomaly detection: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04549, 2023.
  3. T. Wen and R. Keyes, “Time series anomaly detection using convolutional neural networks and transfer learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13628, 2019.
  4. B. Zhou, S. Liu, B. Hooi, X. Cheng, and J. Ye, “Beatgan: Anomalous rhythm detection using adversarially generated time series.” in IJCAI, vol. 2019, 2019, pp. 4433–4439.
  5. J. Xu, H. Wu, J. Wang, and M. Long, “Anomaly transformer: Time series anomaly detection with association discrepancy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02642, 2021.
  6. D. Lee, S. Yu, H. Ju, and H. Yu, “Weakly supervised temporal anomaly segmentation with dynamic time warping,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 7355–7364.
  7. W. Sultani, C. Chen, and M. Shah, “Real-world anomaly detection in surveillance videos,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 6479–6488.
  8. S. Li, F. Liu, and L. Jiao, “Self-training multi-sequence learning with transformer for weakly supervised video anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 2, 2022, pp. 1395–1403.
  9. Y. Chen, Z. Liu, B. Zhang, W. Fok, X. Qi, and Y.-C. Wu, “Mgfn: Magnitude-contrastive glance-and-focus network for weakly-supervised video anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 1, 2023, pp. 387–395.
  10. V. M. Janakiraman, “Explaining aviation safety incidents using deep temporal multiple instance learning,” in Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2018, pp. 406–415.
  11. H. Zhou, S. Zhang, J. Peng, S. Zhang, J. Li, H. Xiong, and W. Zhang, “Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, no. 12, 2021, pp. 11 106–11 115.
  12. A. Deng and B. Hooi, “Graph neural network-based anomaly detection in multivariate time series,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, no. 5, 2021, pp. 4027–4035.
  13. K. Doshi, S. Abudalou, and Y. Yilmaz, “Reward once, penalize once: Rectifying time series anomaly detection,” in 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).   IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8.
  14. E. Dai and J. Chen, “Graph-augmented normalizing flows for anomaly detection of multiple time series,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07857, 2022.
  15. L. Ruff, R. Vandermeulen, N. Goernitz, L. Deecke, S. A. Siddiqui, A. Binder, E. Müller, and M. Kloft, “Deep one-class classification,” in International conference on machine learning.   PMLR, 2018, pp. 4393–4402.
  16. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  17. C. Zhang, G. Li, Y. Qi, S. Wang, L. Qing, Q. Huang, and M.-H. Yang, “Exploiting completeness and uncertainty of pseudo labels for weakly supervised video anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 16 271–16 280.
  18. H. Lv, Z. Yue, Q. Sun, B. Luo, Z. Cui, and H. Zhang, “Unbiased multiple instance learning for weakly supervised video anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 8022–8031.
  19. Z. Zhang, W. Li, W. Ding, L. Zhang, Q. Lu, P. Hu, T. Gui, and S. Lu, “Stad-gan: unsupervised anomaly detection on multivariate time series with self-training generative adversarial networks,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Chen Liu (206 papers)
  2. Shibo He (44 papers)
  3. Haoyu Liu (49 papers)
  4. Shizhong Li (2 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets