Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Enhancing Scalability in Recommender Systems through Lottery Ticket Hypothesis and Knowledge Distillation-based Neural Network Pruning (2401.10484v1)

Published 19 Jan 2024 in cs.IR, cs.AI, and cs.AR

Abstract: This study introduces an innovative approach aimed at the efficient pruning of neural networks, with a particular focus on their deployment on edge devices. Our method involves the integration of the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) with the Knowledge Distillation (KD) framework, resulting in the formulation of three distinct pruning models. These models have been developed to address scalability issue in recommender systems, whereby the complexities of deep learning models have hindered their practical deployment. With judicious application of the pruning techniques, we effectively curtail the power consumption and model dimensions without compromising on accuracy. Empirical evaluation has been performed using two real world datasets from diverse domains against two baselines. Gratifyingly, our approaches yielded a GPU computation-power reduction of up to 66.67%. Notably, our study contributes to the field of recommendation system by pioneering the application of LTH and KD.

Enhancing Scalability in Recommender Systems through Lottery Ticket Hypothesis and Knowledge Distillation-based Neural Network Pruning

This paper presents an approach to improving the scalability and efficiency of deep learning models, specifically within recommender systems, by integrating the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) with Knowledge Distillation (KD) for neural network pruning. The key contribution lies in formulating three novel pruning models—SP-SAD, LTH-SAD, and SS-SAD—that address the inherent complexity and power consumption challenges associated with deploying deep learning models on edge devices.

Overview of Methodology

The integration of LTH and KD facilitates an effective pruning framework that reduces model dimensions while maintaining predictive accuracy. The authors introduce structured and unstructured pruning strategies through dynamic techniques that exploit both the KD framework and the LTH. This involves selecting smaller subnetworks within over-parameterized models ("winning tickets") that retain or exceed the performance of the original network. Knowledge distillation is utilized as a mechanism to tune these smaller models effectively by transferring crucial features from a larger "teacher" model to a simpler "student" model using an attention-guided approach.

Experimental Results

The approach was empirically validated using CIFAR-100 and movie datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in reduced computational power and model size. For instance, in the context of computer vision tasks using CIFAR-100, the models achieved an accuracy of approximately 73% while enabling a reduction in model size by 60% to 70%. In movie recommendation systems, the model showed up to a 32.08% improvement in Mean Squared Error (MSE) and 25.10% improvement in Mean Absolute Error (MAE), alongside a 66.67% reduction in GPU power consumption.

Implications and Future Prospects

The research extends the applicability of CNNs within recommender systems by effectively addressing scalability issues. By reducing model complexity while preserving accuracy, the authors present a scalable solution pertinent for deployment on resource-constrained devices. This has significant implications for industries reliant on recommendation systems, offering a practical approach to optimizing performance without necessitating extensive computational resources.

Future research could explore expanding this methodology to other domains and leveraging additional optimization strategies to further enhance model efficiency. The integration of LTH and KD presented in this paper holds promise for advancing model compression techniques and supports the broader adoption of AI across diverse platforms. The work may also encourage further exploration into the nuanced dynamics of feature transfer between large and small networks, perhaps leading to more nuanced frameworks that could be developed for real-time applications.

The paper underscores the potential of combining theoretical concepts like LTH with practical mechanisms such as KD to achieve scalable AI solutions, demonstrating a focused direction for future applications in AI and machine learning.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Abarja, R. 2020. “Movie Rating Prediction using Convolutional Neural Network based on Historical Values,” International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research (8), pp. 2156–2164.
  2. Alford, S., Robinett, R., Milechin, L., and Kepner, J. 2018. “Pruned and Structurally Sparse Neural Networks,” In: 2018 IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference (URTC).
  3. Asami, T., Masumura, R., Yamaguchi, Y., Masataki, H., and Aono, Y. 2017. “Domain adaptation of DNN acoustic models using knowledge distillation,” In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).
  4. Bharadhwaj, M., Ramadurai, G., and Ravindran, B. 2022. “Detecting Vehicles on the Edge: Knowledge Distillation to Improve Performance in Heterogeneous Road Traffic,” In: 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW).
  5. Chen, H., Fu, J., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Lin, K., Shi, L., and Wang, L. 2019. “Deformable Convolutional Matrix Factorization for Document Context-Aware Recommendation in Social Networks,” IEEE Access (7), pp. 66,347–66,357.
  6. Frankle, J., and Carbin, M. 2019. “The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks,” .
  7. Girish, S., Maiya, S. R., Gupta, K., Chen, H., Davis, L. S., and Shrivastava, A. 2021. “The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Object Recognition,” In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
  8. Gordon, A., Eban, E., Nachum, O., Chen, B., Wu, H., Yang, T.-J., and Choi, E. 2018. “MorphNet: Fast & Simple Resource-Constrained Structure Learning of Deep Networks,” .
  9. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., and Riedl, J. T. 2004. “Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems,” ACM Trans Inf Syst (22:1), p. 5–53. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/963770.963772
  10. Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., and Dean, J. 2015. “Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network,” .
  11. Hou, S., Pan, X., Loy, C. C., Wang, Z., and Lin, D. 2018. “Lifelong Learning via Progressive Distillation and Retrospection,” In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., and Weiss, Y. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  12. Ji, M., Heo, B., and Park, S. 2021. “Show, Attend and Distill:Knowledge Distillation via Attention-based Feature Matching,” .
  13. Krizhevsky, A. 2012. “Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images,” University of Toronto .
  14. Kumar, P., and Thakur, R. S. 2018. “Recommendation system techniques and related issues: a survey,” International Journal of Information Technology (10), pp. 495–501.
  15. Li, Z., and Hoiem, D. 2017. “Learning without Forgetting,” .
  16. Molchanov, P., Tyree, S., Karras, T., Aila, T., and Kautz, J. 2017. “Pruning Convolutional Neural Networks for Resource Efficient Inference,” .
  17. Nagarnaik, P., and Thomas, A. 2015. “Survey on recommendation system methods,” In: 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS).
  18. Nasraoui, O., and Petenes, C. 2003. “An intelligent Web recommendation engine based on fuzzy approximate reasoning,” In: The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ ’03., vol. 2.
  19. Orbes-Arteaga, M., Cardoso, J., Sørensen, L., Igel, C., Ourselin, S., Modat, M., Nielsen, M., and Pai, A. 2019. “Knowledge distillation for semi-supervised domain adaptation,” .
  20. Romero, A., Ballas, N., Kahou, S. E., Chassang, A., Gatta, C., and Bengio, Y. 2015. “FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Nets,” .
  21. Tian, Y., Krishnan, D., and Isola, P. 2022. “Contrastive Representation Distillation,” .
  22. Xia, M., Zhong, Z., and Chen, D. 2022. “Structured Pruning Learns Compact and Accurate Models,” .
  23. Xie, H., Jiang, W., Luo, H., and Yu, H. 2021. “Model compression via pruning and knowledge distillation for person re-identification,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (12).
  24. Xu, K., Ba, J., Kiros, R., Cho, K., Courville, A., Salakhutdinov, R., Zemel, R., and Bengio, Y. 2016. “Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention,” .
  25. Yim, J., Joo, D., Bae, J., and Kim, J. 2017. “A Gift from Knowledge Distillation: Fast Optimization, Network Minimization and Transfer Learning,” In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
  26. Zagoruyko, S., and Komodakis, N. 2016. “Wide Residual Networks,” .
  27. Zhang, S., Yao, L., and Sun, A. 2017. “Deep Learning based Recommender System: A Survey and New Perspectives,” CoRR (abs/1707.07435). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.07435
  28. Zhou, B., Hui, S., and Chang, K. 2004. “An intelligent recommender system using sequential Web access patterns,” In: IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, 2004., vol. 1.
  29. Zhou, G., Mou, N., Fan, Y., Pi, Q., Bian, W., Zhou, C., Zhu, X., and Gai, K. 2018. “Deep Interest Evolution Network for Click-Through Rate Prediction,” .
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Rajaram R (1 paper)
  2. Manoj Bharadhwaj (1 paper)
  3. Vasan VS (1 paper)
  4. Nargis Pervin (1 paper)
Citations (1)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com