Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PPNet: A Two-Stage Neural Network for End-to-end Path Planning (2401.09819v2)

Published 18 Jan 2024 in cs.RO, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: The classical path planners, such as sampling-based path planners, can provide probabilistic completeness guarantees in the sense that the probability that the planner fails to return a solution if one exists, decays to zero as the number of samples approaches infinity. However, finding a near-optimal feasible solution in a given period is challenging in many applications such as the autonomous vehicle. To achieve an end-to-end near-optimal path planner, we first divide the path planning problem into two subproblems, which are path space segmentation and waypoints generation in the given path's space. We further propose a two-stage neural network named Path Planning Network (PPNet) each stage solves one of the subproblems abovementioned. Moreover, we propose a novel efficient data generation method for path planning named EDaGe-PP. EDaGe-PP can generate data with continuous-curvature paths with analytical expression while satisfying the clearance requirement. The results show the total computation time of generating random 2D path planning data is less than 1/33 and the success rate of PPNet trained by the dataset that is generated by EDaGe-PP is about 2 times compared to other methods. We validate PPNet against state-of-the-art path planning methods. The results show that PPNet can find a near-optimal solution in 15.3ms, which is much shorter than the state-of-the-art path planners.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (6)
  1. S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli, “Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 846–894, 2011.
  2. J. D. Gammell, S. S. Srinivasa, and T. D. Barfoot, “Batch Informed Trees (BIT*): Sampling-based optimal planning via the heuristically guided search of implicit random geometric graphs,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2015, pp. 3067–3074.
  3. L. Janson, E. Schmerling, A. Clark, and M. Pavone, “Fast Marching Tree: A fast marching sampling-based method for optimal motion planning in many dimensions,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 883–921, 2015.
  4. S. Koenig, M. Likhachev, and D. Furcy, “Lifelong Planning A*,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 155, no. 1-2, pp. 93–146, 2004. L. E. Kavraki, P. ˇSvestka, J.-C. Latombe, and M. H.
  5. J. Kuffner and S. LaValle, “RRT-Connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 2, 2000, pp. 995–1001.
  6. MMSegmentation Contributors. MMSegmentation: Open-mmlab semantic segmentation toolbox and benchmark. https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmsegmentation, 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets