Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Enablers and Barriers of Empathy in Software Developer and User Interaction: A Mixed Methods Case Study (2401.09001v1)

Published 17 Jan 2024 in cs.SE

Abstract: Software engineering (SE) requires developers to collaborate with stakeholders, and understanding their emotions and perspectives is often vital. Empathy is a concept characterising a person's ability to understand and share the feelings of another. However, empathy continues to be an under-researched human aspect in SE. We studied how empathy is practised between developers and end users using a mixed methods case study. We used an empathy test, observations and interviews to collect data, and socio technical grounded theory and descriptive statistics to analyse data. We identified the nature of awareness required to trigger empathy and enablers of empathy. We discovered barriers to empathy and a set of potential strategies to overcome these barriers. We report insights on emerging relationships and present a set of recommendations and potential future works on empathy and SE for software practitioners and SE researchers.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (79)
  1. Gabriella Airenti. 2015. The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (2015), 117–127.
  2. Antecedents and consequences of collective empathy in software development project teams. Information & Management 52, 2 (2015), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.11.004
  3. Simon Baron-Cohen and Sally Wheelwright. 2004. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 34 (2004), 163–175.
  4. Caroline A Bartel and Richard Saavedra. 2000. The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 2 (2000), 197–231.
  5. C Daniel Batson and Nadia Y Ahmad. 2009. Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Social issues and policy review 3, 1 (2009), 141–177.
  6. ”I’ve Been there, Too”: Effect on Empathy of Prior Experience with a Need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22, 5 (1996), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225005 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225005
  7. Deconstructing the Tower of Babel: a design method to improve empathy and teamwork competences of informatics students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 27, 2 (2017), 307–328.
  8. Design Thinking Use in Agile Software Projects: Software Developers’ Perception. In In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS2020), Vol. 978-989-758-423-7. SCITEPRESS–Science and Technology Publications, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009387502170224
  9. The role of culture in affective empathy: Cultural and bicultural differences. Journal of Cognition and Culture 10, 3-4 (2010), 309–326.
  10. Tanya L Chartrand and John A Bargh. 1999. The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology 76, 6 (1999), 893.
  11. Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48, 1 (2017), 23–38.
  12. Ï feel your pain”: A critical review of organizational research on empathy. Journal of Organizational Behavior 40, 2 (2019), 166–192.
  13. Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion review 8, 2 (2016), 144–153.
  14. Mark Davis. 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10 (1980).
  15. Mark H Davis. 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology 44, 1 (1983), 113.
  16. Menno De Jong and Leo Lentz. 2007. Professional writers and empathy: Exploring the barriers to anticipating reader problems. In 2007 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. IEEE, Seattle, WA, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2007.4464058
  17. Frans BM De Waal. 2008. Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59 (2008), 279–300.
  18. Jean Decety and Philip L. Jackson. 2004. The Functional Architecture of Human Empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 3, 2 (2004), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 PMID: 15537986.
  19. Jean Decety and Yoshiya Moriguchi. 2007. The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical conditions. BioPsychoSocial medicine 1, 1 (2007), 1–21.
  20. Duleep Delpechitre. 2013. Review and assessment of past empathy scales to measure salesperson’s empathy. Journal of Management and Marketing Research 13, 1 (2013), 1–16.
  21. Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs. British Journal of General Practice 66, 653 (2016), e887–e895.
  22. Nancy Eisenberg and Natalie D Eggum. 2009. Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. The social neuroscience of empathy 6, 2009 (2009), 71–830.
  23. Sympathy. In The Handbook of Virtue Ethics (1 ed.). Routledge, London, 409–417. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729053
  24. “I’ve also experienced loss and fear”: Effects of prior similar experience on empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50, 1 (2009), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00673.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00673.x
  25. Paul Ekman and Wallace V Friesen. 1971. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology 17, 2 (1971), 124.
  26. Empathy. Psychotherapy 48, 1 (2011), 43.
  27. Empathy of project management students and why it matters. Procedia Computer Science 181 (2021), 503–510.
  28. Designing Personas with Empathy Map. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE, Vol. 152. Pittsburgh, USA. https://doi.org/10.18293/SEKE2015-152
  29. PATHY: Using empathy with personas to design applications that meet the users’ needs. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Toronto, ON, Canada, 153–165.
  30. Alvin I. Goldman. 2011. 313 Two Routes to Empathy: Insights from Cognitive Neuroscience. In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0004 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/book/0/chapter/151861762/chapter-ag-pdf/44974436/book_7216_section_151861762.ag.pdf
  31. Daniel Goleman. 1996. Emotional Intelligence why it can matter more IQ. Vol. 53. Bloomsbury Publishing, Great Britain. 1689–1699 pages. Issue 9.
  32. The emotional reality of teams. Journal of Organizational Excellence 21, 2 (2002), 55–65.
  33. Dealing With Data Challenges When Delivering Data-Intensive Software Solutions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2023), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2023.3291003
  34. Medical School Objectives Writing Group et al. 1999. Learning objectives for medical student education—guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Academic Medicine 74, 1 (1999), 13–18.
  35. Empathy models and software engineering—A preliminary analysis and taxonomy. Journal of Systems and Software 203 (2023), 111747.
  36. Michaela Guthridge and Melita J Giummarra. 2021. The taxonomy of empathy: A meta-definition and the nine dimensions of the empathic system. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 0 (2021), 00221678211018015. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678211018015
  37. When and how do high status group members offer help: Effects of social dominance orientation and status threat. Political Psychology 29, 6 (2008), 841–858.
  38. Jodi Halpern. 2003. What is clinical empathy? Journal of general internal medicine 18 (2003), 670–674.
  39. Can teaching veterinary and animal-science students about animal welfare affect their attitude toward animals and human-related empathy? Journal of veterinary medical education 38, 1 (2011), 74–83.
  40. Miriam S. Heinke and Winnifred R. Louis. 2009. Cultural Background and Individualistic–Collectivistic Values in Relation to Similarity, Perspective Taking, and Empathy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 39, 11 (2009), 2570–2590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00538.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00538.x
  41. Rashina Hoda. 2021. Socio-technical grounded theory for software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48, 10 (2021), 3808–3832.
  42. The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing Agile teams. Information and software technology 53, 5 (2011), 521–534.
  43. Martin L Hoffman. 2001. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  44. Geert Hofstede. 1991. Empirical models of cultural differences. Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse, Netherlands, 4–20.
  45. Mohammadreza Hojat. 2016. Empathy in health professions education and patient care. Springer, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27625-0
  46. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy: a nationwide study of measurement properties, underlying components, latent variable structure, and national norms in medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education 23, 5 (2018), 899–920.
  47. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educational and psychological measurement 61, 2 (2001), 349–365.
  48. J Howick and S Rees. 2017. Overthrowing barriers to empathy in healthcare: empathy in the age of the Internet. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 110, 9 (2017), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076817714443 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076817714443
  49. Measuring empathy: A literature review of available tools. BPA-Applied Psychology Bulletin (Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata) 65, 280 (2017), 2–28.
  50. Interaction of empathy and culture: a review. Current Psychology 42 (2023), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04422-6
  51. Use of personas in Requirements Engineering: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology 162 (2023), 107–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107264
  52. Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition & Emotion 14, 1 (2000), 93–124.
  53. Meira Levy. 2018. Educating for Empathy in Software Engineering Course. In Joint Proceedings of REFSQ-2018 Workshops, Doctoral Symposium, Live Studies Track, and Poster Track co-located with the 23rd International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2018), Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 19, 2018 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2075), Klaus Schmid, Paola Spoletini, Eya Ben Charrada, Yoram Chisik, Fabiano Dalpiaz, Alessio Ferrari, Peter Forbrig, Xavier Franch, Marite Kirikova, Nazim H. Madhavji, Cristina Palomares, Jolita Ralyté, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Pete Sawyer, Dirk van der Linden, and Anna Zamansky (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1–9. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2075/FIRE18_paper2.pdf
  54. Meira Levy and Irit Hadar. 2018. The importance of empathy for analyzing privacy requirements. In 2018 IEEE 5th International Workshop on Evolving Security & Privacy Requirements Engineering (ESPRE). IEEE, Banff, Canada, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESPRE.2018.00008
  55. John McAvoy and Tom Butler. 2009. A failure to learn by software developers: Inhibiting the adoption of an agile software development methodology. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research 11, 1 (2009), 23–46.
  56. Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity: is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger? Journal of physiological anthropology 34 (2015), 1–9.
  57. Chapter 10 - Measures of Empathy: Self-Report, Behavioral, and Neuroscientific Approaches. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, Gregory J. Boyle, Donald H. Saklofske, and Gerald Matthews (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 257–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00010-3
  58. Rating scales for the assessment of empathic communication in medical interviews (REM): Scale development, reliability, and validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 14 (2007), 367–375.
  59. A study of empathy decline in students from five health disciplines during their first year of training. Int J Med Educ 2 (2011), 12–17.
  60. M.A. Preis and B. Kroener-Herwig. 2012. Empathy for pain: The effects of prior experience and sex. European Journal of Pain 16, 9 (2012), 1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00119.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00119.x
  61. Stephanie D Preston and Frans BM De Waal. 2002. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and brain sciences 25, 1 (2002), 1–20.
  62. The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of personality assessment 93, 1 (2011), 84–95.
  63. Per Runeson and Martin Höst. 2009. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical software engineering 14 (2009), 131–164.
  64. Peter Salovey and John D Mayer. 1990. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality 9, 3 (1990), 185–211.
  65. Daniel Schmelzer. 2015. Empathie in Teams: Empathieverhalten und Empathiekreisläufe. Ph. D. Dissertation. München, Technische Universität München, Diss., 2015.
  66. Donald A Schön. 2017. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (1st ed.). Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
  67. Seth J Schwartz and Jennifer B Unger. 2010. Biculturalism and context: What is biculturalism, and when is it adaptive?: Commentary on Mistry and Wu. Human development 53, 1 (2010), 26.
  68. Nancy E. Snow. 2000. Empathy. American Philosophical Quarterly 37, 1 (2000), 65–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009985
  69. Barriers to empathy-based care: oncology nurses’ perceptions. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 31, 3 (2018), 249–259.
  70. Steven J Taylor and Robert C Bogdan. 1984. Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. Wiley, New York.
  71. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. Wiley, New York.
  72. Chapter 12 - Empathy and emotion regulation: An integrative account. In Emotion and Cognition, Narayanan Srinivasan (Ed.). Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 247. Elsevier, 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.024
  73. Neurophysiological effects of trait empathy in music listening. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 12 (2018), 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00066
  74. Experimentation in software engineering (1st ed.). Vol. 9783642290442. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2
  75. Shali Wu and Boaz Keysar. 2007. The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological science 18, 7 (2007), 600–606.
  76. Do You Feel My Pain? Racial Group Membership Modulates Empathic Neural Responses. Journal of Neuroscience 29, 26 (2009), 8525–8529. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-09.2009 arXiv:https://www.jneurosci.org/content/29/26/8525.full.pdf
  77. Do histories of painful life experiences affect the expression of empathy among young adults? An electroencephalography study. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021), 689304.
  78. Young adults’ empathic responses to others in psychological pain as compared to physical pain: does prior experience of pain matter? Current Psychology 42, 8 (2023), 6194–6215.
  79. Juping Yu and Maggie Kirk. 2009. Evaluation of empathy measurement tools in nursing: systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing 65, 9 (2009), 1790–1806.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets