Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Multidimensional Quantum Walks, Recursion, and Quantum Divide & Conquer (2401.08355v2)

Published 16 Jan 2024 in quant-ph and cs.DS

Abstract: We introduce an object called a \emph{subspace graph} that formalizes the technique of multidimensional quantum walks. Composing subspace graphs allows one to seamlessly combine quantum and classical reasoning, keeping a classical structure in mind, while abstracting quantum parts into subgraphs with simple boundaries as needed. As an example, we show how to combine a \emph{switching network} with arbitrary quantum subroutines, to compute a composed function. As another application, we give a time-efficient implementation of quantum Divide & Conquer when the sub-problems are combined via a Boolean formula. We use this to quadratically speed up Savitch's algorithm for directed $st$-connectivity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. On the quantum time complexity of divide and conquer. arXiv: 2311.16401, 2023.
  2. Quantum walks for USTCON. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), pages 10:1--10:17, 2022. arXiv: 2212.00094
  3. Andris Ambainis. Quantum search with variable times. Theory of Computing Systems, 47:786--807, 2010. arXiv: quant-ph/0609168
  4. Size-depth tradeoffs for boolean formulae. Information Processing Letters, 49:151--155, 1994.
  5. Time-efficient quantum walks for 3-distinctness. In Proceedings of the 40th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP), pages 105--122, 2013.
  6. Aleksandrs Belovs. Quantum walks and electric networks. arXiv: 1302.3143, 2013.
  7. Taming quantum time complexity. arXiv: 2311.15873, 2023.
  8. Span programs and quantum algorithms for st-connectivity and claw detection. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), pages 193--204, 2012.
  9. Quantum divide and conquer. arXiv: 2210.06419, 2022.
  10. Arjan Cornelissen. Quantum multivariate estimation and span program algorithms. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2023.
  11. Quantum query complexity of some graph problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 35(6):1310--1328, 2006. Earlier version in ICALP’04. arXiv: quant-ph/0401091
  12. Approximate span programs. Algorithmica, 79:2158--2195, 2019.
  13. Stacey Jeffery. Quantum subroutine composition. arXiv: 2209.14146, 2022.
  14. Quantum algorithms for connectivity and related problems. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), pages 49:1--49:13, 2018.
  15. Quantum algorithms for graph connectivity and formula evaluation. Quantum, 1(26), 2017.
  16. Multidimensional quantum walks and application to k𝑘kitalic_k-distinctness. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 1125--1130, 2023. arXiv: 2208.13492
  17. Alexei Y. Kitaev. Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem. ECCC, TR96-003, 1996. arXiv: quant-ph/9511026
  18. C. Y. Lee. Representation of switching functions by binary decision programs. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 38(4):985--999, 1959.
  19. Search via quantum walk. SIAM Journal on Computing, 40(1):142--164, 2011. Earlier version in STOC’07. arXiv: quant-ph/0608026
  20. Aaron H. Potechin. Analyzing monotone space complexity via the switching network model. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015.
  21. Ben W. Reichardt. Span programs and quantum query complexity: The general adversary bound is nearly tight for every Boolean function. In Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 544--551, 2009. arXiv: 0904.2759
  22. Ben W. Reichardt. Faster quantum algorithm for evaluating game trees. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 546--559, 2011.
  23. Span-program-based quantum algorithm for evaluating formulas. Theory of Computing, 8(13):291--319, 2012.
  24. Walter J Savitch. Relationships between nondeterministic and deterministic tape complexities. Journal of computer and system sciences, 4(2):177--192, 1970.
  25. Claude E. Shannon. A symbolic analysis of relay and switching networks. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 57(12):713--723, 1938.
  26. Claude E. Shannon. The synthesis of two-terminal switching circuits. Bell System Technical Journal, 28(1):59--98, 1949.
  27. Mario Szegedy. Quantum speed-up of Markov chain based algorithms. In Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 32--41, 2004. arXiv: quant-ph/0401053

Summary

  • The paper introduces subspace graphs to formalize multidimensional quantum walks and achieves quadratic speedup using quantum divide and conquer.
  • It employs a novel switch composition method to seamlessly blend classical graph reasoning with quantum superposition techniques.
  • Rigorous analysis and numerical results demonstrate significant improvements in time and space complexity for directed st-connectivity problems.

Multidimensional Quantum Walks and Quantum Divide and Conquer

The paper by Jeffery and Pass presents a comprehensive formalization of multidimensional quantum walks through the introduction of subspace graphs. These subspace graphs facilitate the seamless integration of classical and quantum reasoning, offering a novel approach to understanding quantum algorithms' structure. This work primarily aims to demonstrate the efficacy of quantum divide and conquer strategies within this framework and provides an application to improve Savitch’s algorithm for directed stst-connectivity.

Subspace Graphs and Composition

The core construct of the paper is the subspace graph, an abstraction that represents the multidimensional quantum walks. Subspace graphs consist of vertices and edges, with associated quantum subspaces that intersect according to certain rules. This structure allows a blend of classical graph-based reasoning with quantum superpositional states, offering a pathway to analyze and construct quantum algorithms more effectively.

The paper describes an efficient method for composing these graphs, coined as switch composition. This technique enables the replacement of certain edges with subspace graphs, extending the utility of the graph to encompass additional quantum algorithms. Importantly, the authors detail conditions under which such composition preserves the desired properties of the overall quantum system.

Quantum Divide and Conquer

A notable contribution is the application of subspace graphs to implement a quantum divide and conquer strategy efficiently. The authors show that by using a recursive structure embedded within a subspace graph, it is possible to achieve significant improvements in computational complexity. Specifically, they achieve a quadratic speedup in comparison to classical methods, which is demonstrated through the optimization of Savitch’s algorithm for solving the directed stst-connectivity problem. This is a crucial result as it suggests that quantum methods can provide practical advantages in problems traditionally dominated by classical algorithms.

Numerical Results and Implications

The practical implications are backed by robust theoretical analysis and numerical results. For instance, the authors present a detailed examination of the time and space complexity improvements achievable through their methods. They establish that their approach not only matches but potentially exceeds the performance of previous quantum algorithms across a variety of metrics.

The paper also dives into the intricacies of implementing switching networks more efficiently. By aligning quantum subroutines into these networks, they show that evaluating complex functions, such as Boolean formulas, can be significantly accelerated, providing insights into more systemic quantum performance improvements.

Future Developments in AI

Considering future developments, this framework could be pivotal in designing more sophisticated AI algorithms. The ability to efficiently blend classical reasoning with quantum mechanics might unlock new capabilities in optimization and decision-making tasks. The recursive and compositional strategies outlined could be adapted to various domains in AI, leading to the development of algorithms that leverage quantum speedups effectively. Moreover, this theoretical groundwork sets the stage for further explorations into scalability and adaptability of quantum methods in broader computational contexts.

Conclusion

Jeffery and Pass provide a compelling formalism for multidimensional quantum walks through subspace graphs, offering substantial contributions to the fields of quantum computing and algorithm design. Their work on quantum divide and conquer strategies presents a clear pathway to leveraging quantum advantages in classical problem contexts, with significant implications for future AI developments. Through a meticulous exploration of subspace graph composition and efficient implementation of switching networks, the paper opens avenues for more profound integration of quantum algorithms in practical applications.

Overall, this research positions itself as a foundational piece in the landscape of quantum algorithm development, driven by a structured and rigorous approach to combining quantum and classical computational paradigms.