Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Revisiting Sampson Approximations for Geometric Estimation Problems (2401.07114v2)

Published 13 Jan 2024 in cs.CV and math.AG

Abstract: Many problems in computer vision can be formulated as geometric estimation problems, i.e. given a collection of measurements (e.g. point correspondences) we wish to fit a model (e.g. an essential matrix) that agrees with our observations. This necessitates some measure of how much an observation ``agrees" with a given model. A natural choice is to consider the smallest perturbation that makes the observation exactly satisfy the constraints. However, for many problems, this metric is expensive or otherwise intractable to compute. The so-called Sampson error approximates this geometric error through a linearization scheme. For epipolar geometry, the Sampson error is a popular choice and in practice known to yield very tight approximations of the corresponding geometric residual (the reprojection error). In this paper we revisit the Sampson approximation and provide new theoretical insights as to why and when this approximation works, as well as provide explicit bounds on the tightness under some mild assumptions. Our theoretical results are validated in several experiments on real data and in the context of different geometric estimation tasks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Felix Rydell (15 papers)
  2. Angélica Torres (7 papers)
  3. Viktor Larsson (39 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

Understanding Sampson Approximations

The Sampson Error Explained

The notion of fitting a mathematical model to a set of observations is an integral part of many computer vision tasks. A commonly used measure to gauge how well a model explains an observation is the smallest perturbation required to perfectly fit the model. Computing this measure directly can be challenging or computationally costly. The Sampson error is a well-established approach that approximates this exact geometric error through a process called linearization.

Theoretical Insights into the Sampson Approximation

The utility of the Sampson approximation has been broadly recognized in computer vision, especially in applications involving epipolar geometry, where it closely approximates the reprojection error or the direct discrepancy between projected and observed points. In this paper, the authors revisit the Sampson approximation to shed light on the theoretical reasons behind its effectiveness. They provide bounds that explain under which conditions the approximation remains tight, contingent on mild assumptions. They affirm the Sampson error's reliability and low computational expense, explaining its widespread adoption in the field.

Enhancements to Classic Sampson Error Calculations

Beyond just revisiting the Sampson error, this research delivers explicit methods for finding bounds on the approximation's accuracy for various polynomial degrees and constraints. Adopting a general approach, the authors extend their insights to cover a broader range of geometric problems beyond classic bipartite cases. For model estimation formulated with constraints of higher-degree polynomials, they establish bounds providing an understanding of the Sampson error's behavior. Importantly, these findings apply to scenarios that map a correspondence across three views, which is pertinent to 3D reconstruction tasks. This expansive perspective offers a nuanced understanding of the Sampson error's applicability across differing computer vision scenarios.

Empirical Validation through Experiments

To affirm their theoretical developments, the authors engage in numerous experiments using real-world data which span different geometric estimation tasks. This validation is crucial since it bridges the gap between theoretical underpinnings and practical implications. The results showcase that the Sampson approximation is not just a theoretical construct but holds water when faced with actual datasets and vision tasks.

Conclusion

In summary, the research revisits the classic Sampson error and extends its theoretical foundation while validating its effectiveness empirically. By offering a detailed examination of the conditions influencing the approximation's precision, this paper provides both a deeper theoretical understanding and a practical assessment of the Sampson error within complex geometric estimation problems. The results suggest that it will continue to be a cornerstone in computer vision applications where efficiency and accuracy are paramount.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com