Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

NetMind: Adaptive RAN Baseband Function Placement by GCN Encoding and Maze-solving DRL (2401.06722v2)

Published 12 Jan 2024 in cs.NI

Abstract: The disaggregated and hierarchical architecture of advanced RAN presents significant challenges in efficiently placing baseband functions and user plane functions in conjunction with Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC) to accommodate diverse 5G services. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel approach NetMind, which leverages Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to determine the function placement strategies in RANs with diverse topologies, aiming at minimizing power consumption. NetMind formulates the function placement problem as a maze-solving task, enabling a Markov Decision Process with standardized action space scales across different networks. Additionally, a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) based encoding mechanism is introduced, allowing features from different networks to be aggregated into a single RL agent. That facilitates the RL agent's generalization capability and minimizes the negative impact of retraining on power consumption. In an example with three sub-networks, NetMind achieves comparable performance to traditional methods that require a dedicated DRL agent for each network, resulting in a 70% reduction in training costs. Furthermore, it demonstrates a substantial 32.76% improvement in power savings and a 41.67% increase in service stability compared to benchmarks from the existing literature.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. 3GPP, “Study on new radio access technology: Radio access architecture and interfaces,” 3GPP, Technical Report 38.801, 2016, release 14.
  2. D. Bhamare et al., “Efficient virtual network function placement strategies for cloud radio access networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 127, 2018.
  3. V. Q. Rodriguez et al., “Cloud-RAN functional split for an efficient fronthaul network,” in Proc. of the IEEE IWCMC Conf., 2020.
  4. H. Yu et al., “DU/CU placement for C-RAN over optical metro-aggregation networks,” in Optical Network Design and Modeling: 23rd IFIP WG 6.10 International Conference.   Springer, 2020.
  5. D. Harutyunyan et al., “Latency-aware service function chain placement in 5G mobile networks,” in Proc. of the IEEE NetSoft Conf., 2019.
  6. ——, “Latency and mobility–aware service function chain placement in 5G networks,” IEEE TMC, vol. 21, no. 5, 2020.
  7. L. M. M. Zorello et al., “Power-efficient baseband-function placement in latency-constrained 5G metro access,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 6, no. 3, 2022.
  8. R. Joda et al., “Deep reinforcement learning-based joint user association and CU–DU placement in O-RAN,” IEEE TNSM, vol. 19, no. 4, 2022.
  9. R. Wang et al., “Edge-enhanced graph neural network for DU-CU placement and lightpath provision in X-Haul networks,” JOCN, vol. 14, no. 10, 2022.
  10. S. Mollahasani, M. Erol-Kantarci, and R. Wilson, “Dynamic CU-DU selection for resource allocation in O-RAN using actor-critic learning,” in Proc. of the IEEE GLOBECOM Conf., 2021.
  11. H. Li et al., “DRL-based energy-efficient baseband function deployments for service-oriented Open RAN,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., 2023.
  12. M. Casazza et al., “Securing virtual network function placement with high availability guarantees,” in 2017 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops, 2017.
  13. Y. Xiao, J. Zhang, and Y. Ji, “Energy-efficient DU-CU deployment and lightpath provisioning for service-oriented 5G metro access/aggregation networks,” J. Light. Technol., vol. 39, no. 17, 2021.
  14. E. Tranos and P. Nijkamp, “Mobile phone usage in complex urban systems: a space–time, aggregated human activity study,” J. Geogr. Syst., vol. 17, no. 2, 2015.
  15. E. A. Papatheofanous, D. Reisis, and K. Nikitopoulos, “The LDPC challenge in software-based 5g new radio physical layer processing,” in Proc. of the IEEE MeditCom Conf., 2021.
  16. R. Rahmani, I. Moser, and M. Seyedmahmoudian, “A complete model for modular simulation of data centre power load,” arXiv:1804.00703, 2018.
  17. A. Ndao et al., “Optimal placement of virtualized dus in O-RAN architecture,” in Proc. of the IEEE VTC2023-Spring Conf., 2023.
  18. P. Li et al., “Rlops: Development life-cycle of reinforcement learning aided open ran,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, 2022.
  19. L. A. B. Burhanuddin et al., “Inter-cell interference mitigation for cellular-connected UAVs using MOSDS-DQN,” IEEE TCCN, 2023.
  20. Alam. (2018, 3) Dimensioning challenges of xhaul. IEEE Task Force. [Online]. Available: https://sagroups.ieee.org/1914/wp-content/uploads/sites/92/2018/03/tf1_1803_Alam_xhaul-dimensioning-challenges_1.pdf
  21. E. Strubell, A. Ganesh, and A. McCallum, “Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP,” arXiv:1906.02243, 2019.
  22. E. García-Martín et al., “Estimation of energy consumption in machine learning,” JPDC, vol. 134, 2019.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com