Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Frequency Masking for Universal Deepfake Detection (2401.06506v3)

Published 12 Jan 2024 in cs.CV and cs.AI

Abstract: We study universal deepfake detection. Our goal is to detect synthetic images from a range of generative AI approaches, particularly from emerging ones which are unseen during training of the deepfake detector. Universal deepfake detection requires outstanding generalization capability. Motivated by recently proposed masked image modeling which has demonstrated excellent generalization in self-supervised pre-training, we make the first attempt to explore masked image modeling for universal deepfake detection. We study spatial and frequency domain masking in training deepfake detectors. Based on empirical analysis, we propose a novel deepfake detector via frequency masking. Our focus on frequency domain is different from the majority, which primarily target spatial domain detection. Our comparative analyses reveal substantial performance gains over existing methods. Code and models are publicly available.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. “Towards universal fake image detectors that generalize across generative models,” in 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023, pp. 24480–24489.
  2. “Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-art,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, ICME 2021, Shenzhen, China, July 5-9, 2021. 2021, pp. 1–6, IEEE.
  3. “What makes fake images detectable? understanding properties that generalize,” in Computer Vision - ECCV 2020 - 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVI. 2020, vol. 12371 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 103–120, Springer.
  4. “A survey on generative modeling with limited data, few shots, and zero shot,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2307.14397, 2023.
  5. “The creation and detection of deepfakes,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 54, pp. 1 – 41, 2020.
  6. “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 10674–10685, 2021.
  7. “Cnn-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot… for now,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2020, Seattle, WA, USA, June 13-19, 2020. 2020, pp. 8692–8701, Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE.
  8. “Discovering transferable forensic features for cnn-generated images detection,” in Computer Vision - ECCV 2022 - 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23-27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XV. 2022, vol. 13675 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 671–689, Springer.
  9. “OST: improving generalization of deepfake detection via one-shot test-time training,” in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
  10. “Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022. 2022, pp. 15979–15988, IEEE.
  11. “Rethinking out-of-distribution (ood) detection: Masked image modeling is all you need,” 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 11578–11589, 2023.
  12. “Masked frequency modeling for self-supervised visual pre-training,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. 2023, OpenReview.net.
  13. “Masked generative adversarial networks are data-efficient generation learners,” in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
  14. “Intriguing properties of synthetic images: from generative adversarial networks to diffusion models,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2023 - Workshops, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 17-24, 2023. 2023, pp. 973–982, IEEE.
  15. “On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion models,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023, vol. abs/2211.00680.
  16. “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Chandler Timm Doloriel (1 paper)
  2. Ngai-Man Cheung (80 papers)
Citations (6)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel frequency masking approach for universal deepfake detection that leverages masked image modeling to enhance model generalization.
  • It demonstrates that frequency domain masking using FFT outperforms traditional spatial masking, achieving the highest mAP with a 15% masking ratio in experiments.
  • The study highlights the potential to integrate frequency-based techniques into scalable deepfake detection systems, advancing image forensics research.

Frequency Masking for Universal Deepfake Detection: An In-Depth Analysis

The paper "Frequency Masking for Universal Deepfake Detection" by Chandler Timm Doloriel and Ngai-Man Cheung addresses a critical challenge in the domain of image synthesis detection—namely, the universal detection of deepfakes generated by a wide spectrum of generative AI models. The proliferation of advanced generative models has necessitated the development of detection methods that are generalizable and robust, particularly as these models continuously evolve. This paper proposes a novel approach centered around frequency masking to enhance the generalization of deepfake detectors, offering an innovative departure from traditional spatial domain-focused detection techniques.

Key Contributions

The authors introduce the idea of using frequency masking as part of the training process for deepfake detection models. Unlike the conventional methods that focus on the spatial characteristics of images, this approach exploits frequency domain properties to better adapt to new and unseen generative models. The contributions of this paper can be summarized as follows:

  1. Exploration of Masked Image Modeling: The authors are the first to leverage masked image modeling in the context of universal deepfake detection. This approach borrows from the strengths of self-supervised learning paradigms, where masking is traditionally applied for reconstruction tasks but here is adapted for classification objectives.
  2. Comparison of Masking Techniques: The paper contrasts spatial domain masking (consisting of patch and pixel masking) with frequency domain masking. Frequency masking, which involves the use of Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to selectively nullify specific frequency components, is shown to offer better performance in generalizing across various unseen generative models.
  3. Empirical Validation: Through comprehensive experiments, frequency masking is empirically validated as more effective than traditional approaches, achieving the highest mean average precision (mAP) during evaluations.

Methodology and Experiments

The methodology section details the specific strategies employed in both spatial and frequency domains. The spatial masking involves two techniques: patch and pixel masking, each selectively nullifying parts of an image to challenge the detector during training. By contrast, frequency masking uses FFT to transform images into their frequency representations before applying the masking. This procedure hinders the model’s reliance on frequency-specific artifacts that may distinguish real from synthetic images.

The experimental section rigorously tests these techniques using a comprehensive dataset, including state-of-the-art generative models like GANs, deepfake generators, and diffusion models. The authors demonstrate significant improvements over previous methods and baselines in terms of detection accuracy and generalizability. Particularly, they show that a 15% masking ratio yields the best results, and all-frequency masking outperforms masking specific frequency bands.

Implications and Future Prospects

The implications of this research are profound. By shifting the emphasis from spatial to frequency domain features, this method presents a robust solution to the problem of detecting deepfakes across diverse, unseen generative models. Frequency masking not only improves the generalization of detection models but also points to potential areas of exploration in the intersection of self-supervised learning and image forensics.

In terms of future developments, potential areas of expansion include fine-tuning the frequency masking approach to adapt dynamically to the kinds of artifacts introduced by upcoming generative models. Moreover, integrating this technique with cutting-edge machine learning frameworks could enhance its scalability and efficiency, particularly when applied to real-time applications.

The authors’ contribution highlights the importance of frequency domain analysis in AI image synthesis and promotes subsequent research into this promising area. The robust experimental framework and significant empirical results pave the way for adopting frequency-based methods in universal applications beyond image forensic, which will be crucial as AI-generated content continues to permeate various fields.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com