Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Scientific Machine Learning Based Reduced-Order Models for Plasma Turbulence Simulations (2401.05972v3)

Published 11 Jan 2024 in physics.comp-ph, cs.CE, cs.LG, and physics.plasm-ph

Abstract: This paper investigates non-intrusive Scientific Machine Learning (SciML) Reduced-Order Models (ROMs) for plasma turbulence simulations. In particular, we focus on Operator Inference (OpInf) to build low-cost physics-based ROMs from data for such simulations. As a representative example, we consider the (classical) Hasegawa-Wakatani (HW) equations used for modeling two-dimensional electrostatic drift-wave turbulence. For a comprehensive perspective of the potential of OpInf to construct predictive ROMs, we consider three setups for the HW equations by varying a key parameter, namely the adiabaticity coefficient. These setups lead to the formation of complex and nonlinear dynamics, which makes the construction of predictive ROMs of any kind challenging. We generate the training datasets by performing direct numerical simulations of the HW equations and recording the computed state data and outputs the over a time horizon of $100$ time units in the turbulent phase. We then use these datasets to construct OpInf ROMs for predictions over $400$ additional time units, that is, $400\%$ more than the training horizon. Our results show that the OpInf ROMs capture important statistical features of the turbulent dynamics and generalize beyond the training time horizon while reducing the computational effort of the high-fidelity simulation by up to five orders of magnitude. In the broader context of fusion research, this shows that non-intrusive SciML ROMs have the potential to drastically accelerate numerical studies, which can ultimately enable tasks such as the design of optimized fusion devices.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. On closures for reduced order models—A spectrum of first-principle to machine-learned avenues. Physics of Fluids, 33(9):091301, 2021.
  2. A. Arakawa. Computational Design for Long-Term Numerical Integration of the Equations of Fluid Motion: Two-Dimensional Incompressible Flow. Part I. Journal of computational physics, 135(2):103–114, 1997.
  3. A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems. SIAM Review, 57(4):483–531, 2015.
  4. The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 25(1):539–575, 1993.
  5. Resistive drift-wave turbulence. Physics of Plasmas, 2(1):48–62, Jan. 1995.
  6. Non-Intrusive Reduced Models based on Operator Inference for Chaotic Systems. 2022.
  7. Dynamic mode decomposition for data-driven analysis and reduced-order modeling of E × B plasmas: I. Extraction of spatiotemporally coherent patterns. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 57(6):065201, Nov. 2023.
  8. Dynamic mode decomposition for data-driven analysis and reduced-order modeling of E × B plasmas: II. Dynamics forecasting. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 57(6):065202, Nov. 2023.
  9. Parametric non-intrusive reduced-order models via operator inference for large-scale rotating detonation engine simulations. In AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jan. 2023.
  10. On filtering in non-intrusive data-driven reduced-order modeling. In AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum, AIAA AVIATION Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, June 2022.
  11. Spatiotemporal multiscaling analysis of impurity transport in plasma turbulence using proper orthogonal decomposition. Physics of Plasmas, 16(4):042506, Apr. 2009.
  12. Operator inference for non-intrusive model reduction with quadratic manifolds. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 403:115717, Jan. 2023.
  13. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
  14. Reduced-order model based feedback control of the Modified Hasegawa-Wakatani model. Physics of Plasmas, 20(4):042501, Apr. 2013.
  15. R. Greif. HW2D: A reference implementation of the Hasegawa-Wakatani model for plasma turbulence in fusion reactors. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(92):5959, Dec. 2023.
  16. Physics-Preserving AI-Accelerated Simulations of Plasma Turbulence, Sept. 2023.
  17. A. Hasegawa and K. Mima. Pseudo-three-dimensional turbulence in magnetized nonuniform plasma. Physics of Fluids, 21(1):87–92, Jan. 1978.
  18. A. Hasegawa and M. Wakatani. Plasma Edge Turbulence. Physical Review Letters, 50(9):682–686, Feb. 1983.
  19. Turbulence model reduction by deep learning. Physical Review E, 101(6):061201, June 2020.
  20. O. Issan and B. Kramer. Predicting Solar Wind Streams from the Inner-Heliosphere to Earth via Shifted Operator Inference. Journal of Computational Physics, 473:111689, Jan. 2023.
  21. Estimation of 2D profile dynamics of electrostatic potential fluctuations using multi-scale deep learning. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 65(12):125003, Oct. 2023.
  22. Characterizing magnetized plasmas with dynamic mode decomposition. Physics of Plasmas, 27(3):032108, Mar. 2020.
  23. P. Khodabakhshi and K. E. Willcox. Non-intrusive data-driven model reduction for differential–algebraic equations derived from lifting transformations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 389:114296, Feb. 2022.
  24. B. Kramer and K. E. Willcox. Nonlinear Model Order Reduction via Lifting Transformations and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. AIAA Journal, 57(6):2297–2307, June 2019.
  25. Sparsity-Promoting Dynamic Mode Decomposition of Plasma Turbulence. Plasma and Fusion Research, 15:1301001–1301001, 2020.
  26. P. Manz. The Microscopic Picture of Plasma Edge Turbulence. habilitation, Technische Universität München, 2019.
  27. Data-driven reduced-order models via regularised Operator Inference for a single-injector combustion process. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 51(2):194–211, Apr. 2021.
  28. Bifurcation in electrostatic resistive drift wave turbulence. Physics of Plasmas, 14(10):102312, Oct. 2007.
  29. B. Peherstorfer and K. Willcox. Data-driven operator inference for nonintrusive projection-based model reduction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 306:196–215, July 2016.
  30. Reduced operator inference for nonlinear partial differential equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 44(4):A1934–A1959, 2022.
  31. Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systems. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 406:132401, May 2020.
  32. C. Runge. Ueber die numerische Auflösung von Differentialgleichungen. Mathematische Annalen, 46(2):167–178, June 1895.
  33. Evaluation of abrupt energy transfer among turbulent plasma structures using singular value decomposition. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 63(2):025004, Dec. 2020.
  34. Learning physics-based reduced-order models for a single-injector combustion process. AIAA Journal, 58(6):2658–2672, June 2020.
  35. Dynamic Mode Decomposition for Plasma Diagnostics and Validation. Review of Scientific Instruments, 89(5):053501, May 2018.
  36. Operator inference with roll outs for learning reduced models from scarce and low-quality data. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 145:224–239, Sept. 2023.
  37. M. Wakatani and A. Hasegawa. A collisional drift wave description of plasma edge turbulence. The Physics of Fluids, 27(3):611–618, Mar. 1984.
  38. P. Welch. The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra: A Method Based on Time Averaging Over Short, Modified Periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15(2):70–73, June 1967.
  39. Data-driven modal analysis of nonlinear quantities in turbulent plasmas using multi-field singular value decomposition. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 65(9):095014, Sept. 2023.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com