Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Challenges, Adaptations, and Fringe Benefits of Conducting Software Engineering Research with Human Participants during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2401.05668v1)

Published 11 Jan 2024 in cs.SE

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the way we live, work and the way we conduct research. With the restrictions of lockdowns and social distancing, various impacts were experienced by many software engineering researchers, especially whose studies depend on human participants. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand the extent of this impact. Through a detailed survey with 89 software engineering researchers working with human participants around the world and a further nine follow-up interviews, we identified the key challenges faced, the adaptations made, and the surprising fringe benefits of conducting research involving human participants during the pandemic. Our findings also revealed that in retrospect, many researchers did not wish to revert to the old ways of conducting human-oriented research. Based on our analysis and insights, we share recommendations on how to conduct remote studies with human participants effectively in an increasingly hybrid world when face-to-face engagement is not possible or where remote participation is preferred.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. Remote user research: 12 tips from experts. https://www.shopify.com/partners/blog/user-research. (Accessed on 11/08/2023)
  2. Research Journal in Advanced Social Sciences 1, 1–9 (2020)
  3. International journal of qualitative methods 18, 1609406919874596 (2019)
  4. In: Proceedings of the XXXIV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 606–615 (2020)
  5. Plos one 15(9), e0238831 (2020)
  6. Technology and Disability 32(2), 69–80 (2020)
  7. In: 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), pp. 362–363. IEEE (2021)
  8. European journal of work and organizational psychology 28(1), 51–73 (2019)
  9. Public Health Ethics 3(1), 35–38 (2010)
  10. Ethics & Human Research 44(6), 23–31 (2022)
  11. New Technology, Work and Employment 30(1), 47–61 (2015)
  12. Nature communications 12(1), 6188 (2021)
  13. Journal of Management Studies (2020)
  14. Group, P.L.N.N.: Doing field studies remotely (video). https://www.nngroup.com/videos/remote-field-studies/ (2020). (Accessed on 11/08/2023)
  15. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 22, p. 7 (2021)
  16. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20, 16094069211010087 (2021)
  17. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9(1), 1–11 (2022)
  18. Herbsleb, J.D.: Global software engineering: The future of socio-technical coordination. In: future of software engineering (FOSE’07), pp. 188–198. IEEE (2007)
  19. Hoda, R.: Socio-technical grounded theory for software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48(10), 3808–3832 (2021)
  20. Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. 11(1), 49–63 (2021)
  21. In: 2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT), pp. 112–121. IEEE (2021)
  22. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992) 109(7), 1323 (2020)
  23. International Journal of Drug Policy 97, 103344 (2021)
  24. Academy of Management Journal 55(6), 1407–1428 (2012)
  25. In: 2021 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2021)
  26. Technology in society 67, 101799 (2021)
  27. Interacting with Computers p. iwac036 (2022)
  28. In: Proceedings of the XXXIV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 596–605 (2020)
  29. In: 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 624–636. IEEE (2021)
  30. In: Seminars in perinatology, vol. 44, p. 151287. Elsevier (2020)
  31. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48(9), 3342–3360 (2021)
  32. Interaction Design and Architecture (s) 50, 7–26 (2021)
  33. In: Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement: 28th European Conference, EuroSPI 2021, Krems, Austria, September 1–3, 2021, Proceedings, pp. 14–33. Springer (2021)
  34. The Journal of clinical investigation 130(6), 2745–2748 (2020)
  35. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20, 16094069211016106 (2021)
  36. Empirical software engineering 25, 4927–4961 (2020)
  37. BMJ Global Health 6(1), e004193 (2021)
  38. PLoS One 17(2), e0263001 (2022)
  39. JCO Global Oncology 7(1), 311–323 (2021)
  40. In: 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), pp. 41–50. IEEE (2021)
  41. Ruppel, S.: When your lab is the world but the world is closed down-social science research in times of covid-19 (2020)
  42. Sako, M.: From remote work to working from anywhere. Communications of the ACM 64(4), 20–22 (2021)
  43. ATS scholar 2(2), 176–184 (2021)
  44. In: HCI International 2021-Posters: 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24–29, 2021, Proceedings, Part III 23, pp. 599–607. Springer (2021)
  45. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 98(9), 625 (2020)
  46. Journal of Systems and Software 186, 111197 (2022)
  47. Tuttle, K.R.: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic on clinical research. Nature Reviews Nephrology 16(10), 562–564 (2020)
  48. Sustainability 13(6), 3320 (2021)
  49. Journal of advanced nursing 71(12), 2775–2785 (2015)
  50. Nature Medicine 27(3), 369–371 (2021)
  51. Woolston, C.: Scientists carry on through the pandemic. Nature 592, 806 (2021)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.