Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
43 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Survey of Designs for Combined 2D+3D Visual Representations (2401.05438v2)

Published 8 Jan 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: We examine visual representations of data that make use of combinations of both 2D and 3D data mappings. Combining 2D and 3D representations is a common technique that allows viewers to understand multiple facets of the data with which they are interacting. While 3D representations focus on the spatial character of the data or the dedicated 3D data mapping, 2D representations often show abstract data properties and take advantage of the unique benefits of mapping to a plane. Many systems have used unique combinations of both types of data mappings effectively. Yet there are no systematic reviews of the methods in linking 2D and 3D representations. We systematically survey the relationships between 2D and 3D visual representations in major visualization publications -- IEEE VIS, IEEE TVCG, and EuroVis -- from 2012 to 2022. We closely examined 105 papers where 2D and 3D representations are connected visually, interactively, or through animation. These approaches are designed based on their visual environment, the relationships between their visual representations, and their possible layouts. Through our analysis, we introduce a design space as well as provide design guidelines for effectively linking 2D and 3D visual representations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (162)
  1. Visualizing tensor normal distributions at multiple levels of detail. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):975–984, 2016. doi: 10/kvh3
  2. A novel framework for visual detection and exploration of performance bottlenecks in organic photovoltaic solar cell materials. Comput. Graph. Forum, 34(3):401–410, 2015. doi: 10/f7kmc5
  3. Multivariate probabilistic range queries for scalable interactive 3D visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):646–656, 2023. doi: 10/kvjw
  4. Interactive volumetric visual analysis of glycogen-derived energy absorption in nanometric brain structures. Comput. Graph. Forum, 38(3):427–439, 2019. doi: 10/kvh2
  5. NeuroBlocks – Visual tracking of segmentation and proofreading for large connectomics projects. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):738–746, 2016. doi: 10/kvhx
  6. NeuroLines: A subway map metaphor for visualizing nanoscale neuronal connectivity. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2369–2378, 2014. doi: 10/f6qkhr
  7. The impact of interactivity on comprehending 2D and 3D visualizations of movement data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 21(1):122–135, 2015. doi: 10/f6r2pf
  8. Dynamic scene graph: Enabling scaling, positioning, and navigation in the universe. Comput. Graph. Forum, 36(3):459–468, 2017. doi: 10/gbvtzx
  9. Dashboard design patterns. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):342–352, 2023. doi: 10/gr6328
  10. Visfer: Camera-based visual data transfer for cross-device visualization. Inf. Visualization, 18(1):68–93, 2019. doi: 10/gfsr4p
  11. Extraction and visual analysis of potential vorticity banners around the Alps. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 26(1):259–269, 2020. doi: 10/kvjk
  12. Brushing scatterplots. Technometrics, 29(2):127–142, 1987. doi: 10/gf7bgr
  13. Hybrid tactile/tangible interaction for 3D data exploration. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):881–890, 2017. doi: 10/f92fj6
  14. ConnectomeExplorer: Query-guided visual analysis of large volumetric neuroscience data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2868–2877, 2013. doi: 10/f5h2sd
  15. An information-aware framework for exploring multivariate data sets. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2683–2692, 2013. doi: 10/f5hwzh
  16. Visual verification of space weather ensemble simulations. In Proc. SciVis, pp. 17–24. IEEE CS, New York, 2016. doi: 10/f3rpxv
  17. D3: Data-driven documents. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 17(12):2301–2309, 2011. doi: 10/b7bhhf
  18. Virtual Reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer, 40(7):36–43, 2007. doi: 10/bkzxbn
  19. R. Brath. 3D InfoVis is here to stay: Deal with it. In Proc. 3DVis, pp. 25–31. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 2014. doi: 10/kjj3
  20. A model of spatial directness in interactive visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(8):2514–2528, 2019. doi: 10/gjbdnn
  21. Interactive data visualization using focusing and linking. In Proc. Visualization, pp. 156–163. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 1991. doi: 10/c7wvqq
  22. IGM-Vis: Analyzing intergalactic and circumgalactic medium absorption using quasar sightlines in a cosmic web context. Comput. Graph. Forum, 38(3):491–504, 2019. doi: 10/kvh4
  23. MoleCollar and tunnel heat map visualizations for conveying spatio-temporo-chemical properties across and along protein voids. Comput. Graph. Forum, 34(3):1–10, 2015. doi: 10/f7kqgf
  24. Visualization and analysis of rotating stall for transonic jet engine simulation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):847–856, 2016. doi: 10/kvjm
  25. Composition and configuration patterns in multiple-view visualizations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):1514–1524, 2021. doi: 10/ghgt6w
  26. A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv., 41(1):2:1–2:31, 2009. doi: 10/dp2c6j
  27. Visualization of object-centered vulnerability to possible flood hazards. Comput. Graph. Forum, 34(3):331–340, 2015. doi: 10/f3s5gx
  28. Multi-charts for comparative 3D ensemble visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2694–2703, 2014. doi: 10/f6qhtt
  29. Revisiting the design patterns of composite visualizations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 2023. To appear. doi: 10/kvj7
  30. TopoMap: A 0-dimensional homology preserving projection of high-dimensional data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):561–571, 2021. doi: 10/kvht
  31. 2D and 3D presentation of spatial data: A systematic review. In Proc. 3DVis, pp. 11–18. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 2014. doi: 10/gftgq4
  32. Visualization of large molecular trajectories. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):987–996, 2019. doi: 10/gjbdnk
  33. Polyphorm: Structural analysis of cosmological datasets via interactive Physarum polycephalum visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):806–816, 2021. doi: 10/kvh5
  34. T. T. Elvins. A survey of algorithms for volume visualization. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 26(3):194–201, 1992. doi: 10/ff8f39
  35. Visualization of human spine biomechanics for spinal surgery. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):700–710, 2021. doi: 10/gmgxsg
  36. Temporal views of flattened mitral valve geometries. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 26(1):971–980, 2020. doi: 10/kvhs
  37. Visualizing carotid blood flow simulations for stroke prevention. Comput. Graph. Forum, 40(3):435–446, 2021. doi: 10/kvhz
  38. Time-hierarchical clustering and visualization of weather forecast ensembles. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):831–840, 2017. doi: 10/f92gjf
  39. Survey of immersive analytics. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(3):2101–2122, 2021. doi: 10/gf73gm
  40. A visual tool for the analysis of algorithms for tomographic fiber reconstruction in materials science. Comput. Graph. Forum, 38(3):273–283, 2019. doi: 10/kvh6
  41. A transparently scalable visualization architecture for exploring the universe. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 13(1):108–121, 2007. doi: 10/fbr3rm
  42. Multiscale visual drilldown for the analysis of large ensembles of multi-body protein complexes. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 26(1):843–852, 2020. doi: 10/kvh7
  43. Combined visualization of wall thickness and wall shear stress for the evaluation of aneurysms. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2506–2515, 2014. doi: 10/f6qh2g
  44. Mining graphs for understanding time-varying volumetric data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):965–974, 2016. doi: 10/gnd6tj
  45. Extracting, tracking, and visualizing magnetic flux vortices in 3D complex-valued superconductor simulation data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):827–836, 2016. doi: 10/gnfg64
  46. Coupled ensemble flow line advection and analysis. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2733–2742, 2013. doi: 10/f5h3q7
  47. A survey of multi-faceted graph visualization. In EuroVis STARs, pp. 1–20. Eurographics Assoc., Goslar, 2015. doi: 10/gng5cj
  48. Interactive volume exploration of petascale microscopy data streams using a visualization-driven virtual memory approach. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2285–2294, 2012. doi: 10/f4fqwj
  49. Design and evaluation of interactive proofreading tools for connectomics. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2466–2475, 2014. doi: 10/f6qbj7
  50. Scale Trotter: Illustrative visual travels across negative scales. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 26(1):654–664, 2020. doi: 10/kt3k
  51. Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Review, 24(1):16–29, Jan. 2004. doi: 10/fdxdb4
  52. 2D, 3D or speech? A case study on which user interface is preferable for what kind of object interaction in immersive virtual reality. Comput. Graph., 82:321–331, 2019. doi: 10/kwcw
  53. Physics-based visual characterization of molecular interaction forces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):731–740, 2017. doi: 10/f9z8cr
  54. SeiVis: An interactive visual subsurface modeling application. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2226–2235, 2012. doi: 10/f4ft4z
  55. FLDA: Latent Dirichlet allocation based unsteady flow analysis. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2545–2554, 2014. doi: 10/f6qkbc
  56. Design and evaluation of three selection techniques for tightly packed 3D objects in cell lineage specification in botany. In Proc. GI, pp. 213–223. CHCCS, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2021. doi: 10/kt3q
  57. LineageD: An interactive visual system for plant cell lineage assignments based on correctable machine learning. Comput. Graph. Forum, 41(3):195–207, 2022. doi: 10/kdqh
  58. FlowNL: Asking the flow data in natural languages. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):1200–1210, 2023. doi: 10/kvj2
  59. 3D object recognition with motion. In CHI EA, pp. 345–346. ACM, New York, 1997. doi: 10/c26b5r
  60. Constructing visual representations: Investigating the use of tangible tokens. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2102–2111, 2014. doi: 10/f6qjtr
  61. FiberClay: Sculpting three dimensional trajectories to reveal structural insights. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):704–714, 2019. doi: 10/kvhw
  62. Hierarchical exploration of volumes using multilevel segmentation of the intensity-gradient histograms. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2355–2363, 2012. doi: 10/f4fwm2
  63. A lightweight tangible 3D interface for interactive visualization of thin fiber structures. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2802–2809, 2013. doi: 10/gh38r2
  64. Opportunities and challenges for data physicalization. In Proc. CHI, pp. 3227–3236. ACM, New York, 2015. doi: 10/gg9fw7
  65. Exploring the design space of composite visualization. In Proc. PacificVis, pp. 1–8. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 2012. doi: 10/gfz7bg
  66. Intuitive exploration of volumetric data using dynamic galleries. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):896–905, 2016. doi: 10/f3pcjr
  67. A design study of direct-touch interaction for exploratory 3D scientific visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum, 31(3):1225–1234, 2012. doi: 10/f9skp7
  68. Interactive visual analysis of image-centric cohort study data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):1673–1682, 2014. doi: 10/f6qh8n
  69. Visual and quantitative analysis of great arteries’ blood flow jets in cardiac 4D PC-MRI data. Comput. Graph. Forum, 37(3):195–204, 2018. doi: 10/gdxcst
  70. A fractional Cartesian composition model for semi-spatial comparative visualization design. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):851–860, 2017. doi: 10/f92dz8
  71. Visual analysis of charge flow networks for complex morphologies. Comput. Graph. Forum, 38(3):479–489, 2019. doi: 10/gjbktt
  72. Interactive patient-specific vascular modeling with sweep surfaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2828–2837, 2013. doi: 10/f5h282
  73. ADR – Anatomy-driven reformation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2496–2505, 2014. doi: 10/f6qjtx
  74. Molecular surface maps. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):701–710, 2017. doi: 10/gfz679
  75. Interactive extraction and tracking of biomolecular surface features. Comput. Graph. Forum, 32(3):331–340, 2013. doi: 10/gbdg8q
  76. Visualizing network traffic to understand the performance of massively parallel simulations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2467–2476, 2012. doi: 10/f4ft4c
  77. VisTiles: Coordinating and combining co-located mobile devices for visual data exploration. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 24(1):626–636, 2018. doi: 10/gcpw95
  78. MARVIS: Combining mobile devices and augmented reality for visual data analysis. In Proc. CHI, pp. 468:1–468:17. ACM, New York, 2021. doi: 10/gksmhm
  79. Occlusion-free blood flow animation with wall thickness visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):728–737, 2016. doi: 10/kt4r
  80. GRay: Ray casting for visualization and interactive data exploration of Gaussian mixture models. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):526–536, 2023. doi: 10/kvjs
  81. Zooids: Building blocks for swarm user interfaces. In Proc. UIST, pp. 97–109. ACM, New York, 2016. doi: 10/ghrsrj
  82. Dynamic composite data physicalization using wheeled micro-robots. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):737–747, 2019. doi: 10/kjkk
  83. Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognit. Psychol., 19(3):342–368, 1987. doi: 10/c54f3f
  84. A design space for data visualisation transformations between 2D and 3D in mixed-reality environments. In Proc. CHI, pp. 25:1–25:14. ACM, New York, 2022. doi: 10/kvj4
  85. Analyzing residue surface proximity to interpret molecular dynamics. Comput. Graph. Forum, 37(3):379–390, 2018. doi: 10/gdw4mc
  86. Interactive visualization of RNA and DNA structures. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):967–976, 2019. doi: 10/ggjbtr
  87. A suggestive interface for untangling mathematical knots. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):593–602, 2021. doi: 10/kvjp
  88. Design and evaluation of interactive small multiples data visualisation in immersive spaces. In Proc. VR, pp. 588–597. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 2020. doi: 10/gktm76
  89. Association analysis for visual exploration of multivariate scientific data sets. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(1):955–964, 2016. doi: 10/kvjn
  90. Details-first, show context, overview last: Supporting exploration of viscous fingers in large-scale ensemble simulations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):1225–1235, 2019. doi: 10/cvzj
  91. GRACE: A visual comparison framework for integrated spatial and non-spatial geriatric data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2916–2925, 2013. doi: 10/f5h3rc
  92. Immersive Analytics. Springer, Cham, 2018. doi: 10/kt9x
  93. A framework for GPU-accelerated exploration of massive time-varying rectilinear scalar volumes. Comput. Graph. Forum, 38(3):53–66, 2019. doi: 10/k46k
  94. Visual analysis of electronic densities and transitions in molecules. Comput. Graph. Forum, 40(3):287–298, 2021. doi: 10/gmkj56
  95. Visual analysis of aneurysm data using statistical graphics. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):997–1007, 2019. doi: 10/kvjg
  96. Semi-automatic vortex flow classification in 4D PC-MRI data of the aorta. Comput. Graph. Forum, 35(3):351–360, 2016. doi: 10/f8wcgs
  97. GUCCI – Guided cardiac cohort investigation of blood flow data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(3):1876–1892, 2023. doi: 10/k5cm
  98. Combined visualization of vessel deformation and hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):761–770, 2017. doi: 10/f92d8h
  99. DimSUM: Dimension and scale unifying map for visual abstraction of DNA origami structures. Comput. Graph. Forum, 37(3):403–413, 2018. doi: 10/gdw4j6
  100. Vessel visualization using curvicircular feature aggregation. Comput. Graph. Forum, 32(3):231–240, 2013. doi: 10/f3s22g
  101. Abstractocyte: A visual tool for exploring nanoscale astroglial cells. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 24(1):853–861, 2018. doi: 10/gcqk6d
  102. 3D-cardiomics: A spatial transcriptional atlas of the mammalian heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 163:20–32, 2022. doi: 10/kv62
  103. T. Munzner. Visualization Analysis and Design. CRC Press, New York, 2014. doi: 10/gd3xgq
  104. Corresponding supine and prone colon visualization using eigenfunction analysis and fold modeling. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):751–760, 2017. doi: 10/f92f38
  105. AmniVis—A system for qualitative exploration of near-wall hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms. Comput. Graph. Forum, 32(3):251–260, 2013. doi: 10/gbdg76
  106. Level set restricted Voronoi tessellation for large scale spatial statistical analysis. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):548–558, 2023. doi: 10/kvjt
  107. A visualization framework for multi-scale coherent structures in Taylor-Couette turbulence. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):902–912, 2021. doi: 10/ghgt45
  108. Visual analysis and detection of contrails in aircraft engine simulations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):798–808, 2023. doi: 10/kvjz
  109. Scale-space splatting: Reforming spacetime for cross-scale exploration of integral measures in molecular dynamics. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 26(1):643–653, 2020. doi: 10/kvh8
  110. MovExp: A versatile visualization tool for Human-Computer Interaction studies with 3D performance and biomechanical data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2359–2368, 2014. doi: 10/gh95ns
  111. Arena3D: Visualization of biological networks in 3D. BMC Syst. Biol., 2:104:1–104:7, 2008. doi: 10/cp9dhb
  112. Extensible visualization and analysis for multidimensional images using Vaa3D. Nature Protocols, 9:193–208, 2014. doi: 10/f5nc4s
  113. Employing 2D projections for fast visual exploration of large fiber tracking data. Comput. Graph. Forum, 31(3):1075–1084, 2012. doi: 10/f9skqf
  114. Visual analysis of large multivariate scattered data using clustering and probabilistic summaries. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):1580–1590, 2021. doi: 10/ghgt63
  115. MObjects—A novel method for the visualization and interactive exploration of defects in industrial XCT data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2906–2915, 2013. doi: 10/f5h3qx
  116. Personal augmented reality for information visualization on large interactive displays. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):1182–1192, 2021. doi: 10/ghgt5w
  117. Multivariate data analysis using persistence-based filtering and topological signatures. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2382–2391, 2012. doi: 10/f4ftqq
  118. Cone Trees: Animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. In Proc. CHI, pp. 189–194. ACM, New York, 1991. doi: 10/cktr2m
  119. Illustrative multivariate visualization for geological modelling. Comput. Graph. Forum, 37(3):465–477, 2018. doi: 10/gdxbc8
  120. ChemVA: Interactive visual analysis of chemical compound similarity in virtual screening. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):891–901, 2021. doi: 10/ghgt43
  121. Data comets: Designing a visualization tool for analyzing autonomous aerial vehicle logs with grounded evaluation. Comput. Graph. Forum, 39(3):455–468, 2020. doi: 10/kvjj
  122. A design space for linked 2D and 3D visual representations. In Posters at IEEE VIS, 2022.
  123. Maps around me: 3D multiview layouts in immersive spaces. Proc. ACM. Hum. Comput. Interact., 4(ISS):201:1–201:20, 2020. doi: 10/gjbt8b
  124. Tangible globes for data visualisation in augmented reality. In Proc. CHI, pp. 505:1–505:16. ACM, New York, 2022. doi: 10/grv5tm
  125. The Anatomical Edutainer. In Proc. Visualization, pp. 1–5. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 2020. doi: 10/gmc676
  126. Trend-centric motion visualization: Designing and applying a new strategy for analyzing scientific motion collections. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2644–2653, 2014. doi: 10/ggn7d7
  127. The design and implementation of an object-oriented toolkit for 3D graphics and visualization. In Proc. Visualization, pp. 93–100. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 1996. doi: 10/fj9wq4
  128. A design space of visualization tasks. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 19(12):2366–2375, 2013. doi: 10/f5h3mb
  129. Towards the big picture: Enriching 3D models with information visualisation and vice versa. In Proc. Smart Graphics, pp. 27–39. Springer, Berlin, 2009. doi: 10/drn4qm
  130. Interactive visualization of generalized virtual 3D city models using level-of-abstraction transitions. Comput. Graph. Forum, 31(3):885–894, 2012. doi: 10/kvjq
  131. A progressive approach for uncertainty visualization in diffusion tensor imaging. Comput. Graph. Forum, 40(3):411–422, 2021. doi: 10/kvjc
  132. PelVis: Atlas-based surgical planning for oncological pelvic surgery. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 23(1):741–750, 2017. doi: 10/f92fzp
  133. Interactive visual analysis of structure-borne noise data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):778–787, 2023. doi: 10/kvjx
  134. Towards systematic design considerations for visualizing cross-view data relationships. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 28(12):4741–4756, 2022. doi: 10/gmrz3r
  135. ShapeBots: Shape-changing swarm robots. In Proc. UIST, pp. 493–505. ACM, New York, 2019. doi: 10/kvj5
  136. Exploring time-varying multivariate volume data using matrix of isosurface similarity maps. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):1236–1245, 2019. doi: 10/kvjd
  137. 2D vs 3D, implications on spatial memory. In Proc. InfoVis, pp. 139–145. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, 2001. doi: 10/b92c4z
  138. The Topology Toolkit. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 24(1):832–842, 2018. doi: 10/gcp6wf
  139. Stacking-based visualization of trajectory attribute data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2565–2574, 2012. doi: 10/f4fwrb
  140. Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 12(1):2–13, Jan. 2006. doi: 10/ccjthz
  141. Barrio: Customizable spatial neighborhood analysis and comparison for nanoscale brain structures. Comput. Graph. Forum, 41(3):183–194, 2022. doi: 10/kvj3
  142. sMolBoxes: Dataflow model for molecular dynamics exploration. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 29(1):581–590, 2023. doi: 10/kvjv
  143. Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3.4):915–931, 2000. doi: 10/dgcj65
  144. A visual analysis concept for the validation of geoscientific simulation models. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2216–2225, 2012. doi: 10/f4ftzp
  145. Visual analysis of protein-ligand interactions. Comput. Graph. Forum, 37(3):391–402, 2018. doi: 10/gdxbbw
  146. Visual abstraction. In Foundations of Data Visualization, chap. 2, pp. 15–37. Springer, Berlin, 2020. doi: 10/gk874c
  147. Pondering the concept of abstraction in (illustrative) visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 24(9):2573–2588, 2018. doi: 10/gd3k7m
  148. Towards an understanding of augmented reality extensions for existing 3D data analysis tools. In Proc. CHI, pp. 528:1–528:13. New York, 2020. doi: 10/gm4jj8
  149. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In Proc. AVI, pp. 110–119. ACM, New York, 2000. doi: 10/cqq2cj
  150. C. Ware. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, 4th ed., 2019. doi: 10/kvj8
  151. Many plans: Multidimensional ensembles for visual decision support in flood management. Comput. Graph. Forum, 33(3):281–290, 2014. doi: 10/kvhv
  152. Dynamic volume lines: Visual comparison of 3D volumes through space-filling curves. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):1040–1049, 2019. doi: 10/kvjh
  153. Cohort-based T-SSIM visual computing for radiation therapy prediction and exploration. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 26(1):949–959, 2020. doi: 10/kvjf
  154. G. Wills. Linked data views. In Handbook of Data Visualization, chap. II.9, pp. 217–241. Springer, Berlin, 2008. doi: 10/dkvn57
  155. Origin-destination flow maps in immersive environments. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 25(1):693–703, 2019. doi: 10/grf8fc
  156. Maps and globes in virtual reality. Comput. Graph. Forum, 37(3):427–438, 2018. doi: 10/gf78xn
  157. ShuttleSpace: Exploring and analyzing movement trajectory in immersive visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):860–869, 2021. doi: 10/ghgt4x
  158. FI3D: Direct-touch interaction for the exploration of 3D scientific visualization spaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 16(6):1613–1622, 2010. doi: 10/fc2df8
  159. KnotPad: Visualizing and exploring knot theory with fluid Reidemeister moves. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 18(12):2051–2060, 2012. doi: 10/f4fq26
  160. Visualizing 2-dimensional manifolds with curve handles in 4D. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2575–2584, 2014. doi: 10/f6qh65
  161. Data-driven space-filling curves. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27(2):1591–1600, 2021. doi: 10/ghgt64
  162. Predicate-based focus-and-context visualization for 3D ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12):2379–2387, 2014. doi: 10/f6qh5j
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.