Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Analysis and Perspectives on the ANA Avatar XPRIZE Competition (2401.05290v1)

Published 10 Jan 2024 in cs.RO and cs.HC

Abstract: The ANA Avatar XPRIZE was a four-year competition to develop a robotic "avatar" system to allow a human operator to sense, communicate, and act in a remote environment as though physically present. The competition featured a unique requirement that judges would operate the avatars after less than one hour of training on the human-machine interfaces, and avatar systems were judged on both objective and subjective scoring metrics. This paper presents a unified summary and analysis of the competition from technical, judging, and organizational perspectives. We study the use of telerobotics technologies and innovations pursued by the competing teams in their avatar systems, and correlate the use of these technologies with judges' task performance and subjective survey ratings. It also summarizes perspectives from team leads, judges, and organizers about the competition's execution and impact to inform the future development of telerobotics and telepresence.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (58)
  1. Evan Ackermann. New guidelines for $10 million avatar xprize promise compelling robot challenge. IEEE Spectrum, September 2018.
  2. Evan Ackermann. Xprize’s $10 million telepresence robot challenge is not challenging enough. IEEE Spectrum, March 2018.
  3. Evan Ackermann. Your robotic avatar is almost ready. IEEE Spectrum, April 2023.
  4. The role of gesture in social telepresence robots—a scenario of distant collaborative problem-solving. Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction, pages 61–83, 2019.
  5. Medical telerobotic systems: Current status and future trends. BioMedical Engineering Online, 15(1), 2016.
  6. The second me: Seeing the real body during humanoid robot embodiment produces an illusion of bi-location. Consciousness and Cognition, 46:99–109, 2016.
  7. Object touch by a humanoid robot avatar induces haptic sensation in the real hand. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(4):215–230, 2017.
  8. Sven Behnke. Robot competitions – Ideal benchmarks for robotics research. In Proceedings of IROS-2006 Workshop on Benchmarks in Robotics Research, 2006.
  9. Team NimbRo at MBZIRC 2017: Fast landing on a moving target and treasure hunting with a team of micro aerial vehicles. Journal of Field Robotics, 36(1):204–229, 2019.
  10. Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the networked minds theory and measure. Proceedings of PRESENCE, 2002:7–36, 2002.
  11. The DARPA Urban Challenge: Autonomous vehicles in city traffic, volume 56 of Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics (STAR). Springer, 2009.
  12. Enhanced visual feedback with decoupled viewpoint control in immersive humanoid robot teleoperation using slam. In IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, volume 2022-November, pages 306–313. IEEE Computer Society, 2022.
  13. Analysis and observations from the first Amazon Picking Challenge. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 15(1):172–188, 2016.
  14. Everyday proxy objects for virtual reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–6, 2021.
  15. A technical review on adaptive algorithms for acoustic echo cancellation. In 2014 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, pages 041–045. IEEE, 2014.
  16. Soft robots. Encyclopedia of Robotics, 489, 2020.
  17. Nursing and human-computer interaction in healthcare robots for older people: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, page 100072, 2022.
  18. Thermal bilateral coupling in teleoperators. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1301–1306, Aug 2005.
  19. George Farkas. Fixed-effects models. In Kimberly Kempf-Leonard, editor, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, pages 45–50. Elsevier, New York, 2005.
  20. Grasping temperature: Thermal feedback in vr robot teleoperation. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, pages 261–266, 2022.
  21. Multisensory experiences in virtual reality and augmented reality interaction paradigms. In Smart Systems Design, Applications, and Challenges, pages 276–298. IGI Global, 2020.
  22. Humanoid robots in soccer: Robots versus humans in RoboCup 2050. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 22(3):147–154, 2015.
  23. Google, Inc. webrtc, 2023. Accessed October 19, 2023.
  24. Modeling Identification and Control of Peltier Thermoelectic Modules for Telepresence. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 133(3), 03 2011.
  25. The DARPA Autonomous Robotic Manipulation (ARM) program: A synopsis. Autonomous Robots, 36(1-2):5–9, 2014.
  26. A review of telepresence, virtual reality, and augmented reality applied to clinical care. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 5(2):178––205, 2020.
  27. Neville Hogan. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part ii—implementation. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 107(1):8–16, March 1985.
  28. A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, (art. no. 902316), 2013.
  29. The DARPA robotics challenge finals: Results and perspectives. In The DARPA Robotics Challenge Finals: Humanoid Robots To The Rescue, pages 1–26. Springer, 2018.
  30. Alter-ego: a mobile robot with a functionally anthropomorphic upper body designed for physical interaction. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 26(4):94–107, 2019.
  31. Bimanual telemanipulation with force and haptic feedback through an anthropomorphic avatar system. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 161:104338, 2023.
  32. Tikl: Development of a wearable vibrotactile feedback suit for improved human motor learning. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):919–926, 2007.
  33. Immersed in media: Telepresence Theory Measurement & Technology. Springer, 2015.
  34. What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(1):71–77, 2005.
  35. Robotics competitions and challenges. Springer handbook of robotics, pages 1759–1788, 2016.
  36. NewTech, Inc. Ndi software development kit, 2023. Accessed October 19, 2023.
  37. Telerobotics. Springer handbook of robotics, pages 1085–1108, 2016.
  38. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5:114, 2018.
  39. A review on teleoperation of mobile ground robots: Architecture and situation awareness. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 19(3):1384––1407, 2021.
  40. Quartz Magazine. Xprize boss anousheh ansari says the best moonshot ideas are “audacious, but still achievable”, 2019.
  41. A review of haptic feedback in tele-operated robotic surgery. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 44(5):247–254, 2020.
  42. VR facial animation for immersive telepresence avatars. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 2167–2174, 2022.
  43. Avatar realism and social interaction quality in virtual reality. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pages 277–278. IEEE, 2016.
  44. Low-latency immersive 6D televisualization with spherical rendering. In IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pages 320–325, 2021.
  45. Team NimbRo at MBZIRC 2017: Autonomous valve stem turning using a wrench. Journal of Field Robotics, 36(1):170–182, 2019.
  46. Fast object learning and dual-arm coordination for cluttered stowing, picking, and packing. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3347–3354, 2018.
  47. Robust immersive telepresence and mobile telemanipulation: NimbRo wins ANA Avatar XPRIZE finals. CoRR, abs/2303.03297, 2023.
  48. NimbRo Avatar: Interactive immersive telepresence with force-feedback telemanipulation. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 5312–5319, 2021.
  49. Unmanned vehicles come of age: The DARPA Grand Challenge. Computer, 39(12):26–29, 2006.
  50. The impact of a self-avatar on cognitive load in immersive virtual reality. In 2016 IEEE virtual reality (VR), pages 67–76. IEEE, 2016.
  51. RoboCup@Home: Demonstrating everyday manipulation skills in RoboCup@Home. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19(2):34–42, 2012.
  52. Susumu Tachi. Telexistence: Past, present, and future. In Virtual Realities: International Dagstuhl Seminar, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, June 9-14, 2013, Revised Selected Papers, pages 229–259. Springer, 2015.
  53. Tele-existence (i): Design and evaluation of a visual display with sensation of presence. In Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators: Proceedings of RoManSy’84: The Fifth CISM—IFToMM Symposium, pages 245–254. Springer, 1985.
  54. The RoboCup-Rescue project: A robotic approach to the disaster mitigation problem. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), volume 4, pages 4089–4094, 2000.
  55. What comes after telepresence? embodiment, social presence and transporting one’s functional and social self. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pages 2067–2072. IEEE, 2022.
  56. Social touch in human–computer interaction. Frontiers in digital humanities, 2:2, 2015.
  57. Connected through mediated social touch:“better than a like on facebook.” a longitudinal explorative field study among geographically separated romantic couples. Frontiers in psychology, 13:291, 2022.
  58. Variable impedance actuators: A review. Robotics and autonomous systems, 61(12):1601–1614, 2013.
Citations (17)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.