Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Network Layout Algorithm with Covariate Smoothing (2401.04771v1)

Published 9 Jan 2024 in cs.SI, physics.soc-ph, and stat.ME

Abstract: Network science explores intricate connections among objects, employed in diverse domains like social interactions, fraud detection, and disease spread. Visualization of networks facilitates conceptualizing research questions and forming scientific hypotheses. Networks, as mathematical high-dimensional objects, require dimensionality reduction for (planar) visualization. Visualizing empirical networks present additional challenges. They often contain false positive (spurious) and false negative (missing) edges. Traditional visualization methods don't account for errors in observation, potentially biasing interpretations. Moreover, contemporary network data includes rich nodal attributes. However, traditional methods neglect these attributes when computing node locations. Our visualization approach aims to leverage nodal attribute richness to compensate for network data limitations. We employ a statistical model estimating the probability of edge connections between nodes based on their covariates. We enhance the Fruchterman-Reingold algorithm to incorporate estimated dyad connection probabilities, allowing practitioners to balance reliance on observed versus estimated edges. We explore optimal smoothing levels, offering a natural way to include relevant nodal information in layouts. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in achieving robust network visualization, providing insights for improved analysis.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. Ambient volume scattering. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 19(12):2936–2945, 2013.
  2. What is the difference between missing completely at random and missing at random? International journal of epidemiology, 43(4):1336–1339, 2014.
  3. Explanation through network visualization. Methodology, 2(1):16–23, 2006.
  4. Network visualization for financial crime detection. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25(4):433–451, 2014.
  5. Enabling network inference methods to handle missing data and outliers. BMC bioinformatics, 16(1):1–12, 2015.
  6. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and experience, 21(11):1129–1164, 1991.
  7. Colin Goodall. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 53(2):285–321, 1991.
  8. Representing uncertainty in graph edges: An evaluation of paired visual variables. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 21(10):1173–1186, 2015.
  9. Till Hoffmann. Github profile. https://github.com/tillahoffmann/networkdata/blob/main/addhealth/README.md, 2023.
  10. Forceatlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the gephi software. PloS one, 9(6):e98679, 2014.
  11. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information processing letters, 31(1):7–15, 1989.
  12. Gueorgi Kossinets. Effects of missing data in social networks. Social networks, 28(3):247–268, 2006.
  13. Visual semiotics & uncertainty visualization: An empirical study. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 18(12):2496–2505, 2012.
  14. The state of the art in multilayer network visualization. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 38, pages 125–149. Wiley Online Library, 2019.
  15. James Moody. Peer influence groups: identifying dense clusters in large networks. Social networks, 23(4):261–283, 2001.
  16. Immunization strategies in networks with missing data. PLoS computational biology, 16(7):e1007897, 2020.
  17. Probabilistic graph layout for uncertain network visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23(1):531–540, 2016.
  18. Social network visualization: Can we go beyond the graph. In Workshop on social networks, CSCW, volume 4, pages 6–10, 2004.
  19. Ambiguityvis: Visualization of ambiguity in graph layouts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1):359–368, 2015.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.