Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Healthcare Voice AI Assistants: Factors Influencing Trust and Intention to Use (2401.04543v2)

Published 9 Jan 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: AI assistants such as Alexa, Google Assistant, and Siri, are making their way into the healthcare sector, offering a convenient way for users to access different healthcare services. Trust is a vital factor in the uptake of healthcare services, but the factors affecting trust in voice assistants used for healthcare are under-explored and this specialist domain introduces additional requirements. This study explores the effects of different functional, personal, and risk factors on trust in and adoption of healthcare voice AI assistants (HVAs), generating a partial least squares structural model from a survey of 300 voice assistant users. Our results indicate that trust in HVAs can be significantly explained by functional factors (usefulness, content credibility, quality of service relative to a healthcare professional), together with security, and privacy risks and personal stance in technology. We also discuss differences in terms of trust between HVAs and general-purpose voice assistants as well as implications that are unique to HVAs.

View on arXiv
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (210)
  1. MM Abbasi and S Kashiyarndi. 2006. Clinical Decision Support Systems: A discussion on different methodologies used in Health Care. Marlaedalen University Sweden (2006).
  2. More than smart speakers: security and privacy perceptions of smart home personal assistants. In Fifteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ({normal-{\{{SOUPS}normal-}\}} 2019). 451–466.
  3. Privacy Norms for Smart Home Personal Assistants. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
  4. Communicative and social consequences of interactions with voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior 112 (2020), 106466.
  5. Ritu Agarwal and Jayesh Prasad. 1998. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information systems research 9, 2 (1998), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  6. Understanding key drivers affecting students’ use of artificial intelligence-based voice assistants. Education and Information Technologies (2022), 1–21.
  7. Emily Couvillon Alagha and Rachel Renee Helbing. 2019. Evaluating the quality of voice assistants’ responses to consumer health questions about vaccines: an exploratory comparison of Alexa, Google Assistant and Siri. BMJ health & care informatics 26, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100075
  8. Areej AlHogail. 2018. Improving IoT technology adoption through improving consumer trust. Technologies 6, 3 (2018), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6030064
  9. The effect of security, privacy, familiarity, and trust on users’ attitudes toward the use of the IoT-based healthcare: the mediation role of risk perception. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 111341–111354.
  10. Music, Search, and IoT: How People (Really) Use Voice Assistants. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 26, 3 (2019), 28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311956
  11. Alyssa Appelman and S Shyam Sundar. 2016. Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93, 1 (2016), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057
  12. FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier’s declarations of conformity. IBM Journal of Research and Development 63, 4/5 (2019), 6–1.
  13. Artificial intelligence and human trust in healthcare: focus on clinicians. Journal of medical Internet research 22, 6 (2020), e15154. https://doi.org/doi:10.2196/15154
  14. Control variable use and reporting in macro and micro management research. Organizational Research Methods 15, 1 (2012), 57–74.
  15. Richard P Bagozzi and Youjae Yi. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science 16, 1 (1988), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  16. Phoebe E Bailey and Tarren Leon. 2019. A systematic review and meta-analysis of age-related differences in trust. Psychology and aging 34, 5 (2019), 674.
  17. A comparison of artificial intelligence and human doctors for the purpose of triage and diagnosis. Frontiers in artificial intelligence 3 (2020), 543405.
  18. Do context and personality matter? Trust and privacy concerns in disclosing private information online. Information & Management 53, 1 (2016), 1–21.
  19. “A Second Voice”: Investigating Opportunities and Challenges for Interactive Voice Assistants to Support Home Health Aides (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 45, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517683
  20. “A Second Voice”: Investigating Opportunities and Challenges for Interactive Voice Assistants to Support Home Health Aides. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17.
  21. Izak Benbasat and Weiquan Wang. 2005. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the association for information systems 6, 3 (2005), 4.
  22. Medbot: Conversational artificial intelligence powered chatbot for delivering tele-health after covid-19. In 2020 5th international conference on communication and electronics systems (ICCES). IEEE, 870–875.
  23. Patient and consumer safety risks when using conversational assistants for medical information: an observational study of Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant. Journal of medical Internet research 20, 9 (2018), e11510.
  24. Reuben Binns. 2018. Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 149–159.
  25. Leakage of Sensitive Information to Third-Party Voice Applications. In ACM CUI 2022: 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. 32:1–32:4.
  26. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
  27. Open-source automated insulin delivery: international consensus statement and practical guidance for health-care professionals. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 10, 1 (2022), 58–74.
  28. An empirical study of older adult’s voice assistant use for health information seeking. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 12, 2 (2022), 1–32.
  29. Virtual assistant to improve self-care of older people with type 2 diabetes: first prototype. In International Workshop on Gerontechnology. Springer, 236–248.
  30. Emily Buteau and Joonghwa Lee. 2021. Hey Alexa, why do we use voice assistants? The driving factors of voice assistant technology use. Communication Research Reports 38, 5 (2021), 336–345.
  31. Useful shortcuts: Using design heuristics for consent and permission in smart home devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 182 (2024), 103177.
  32. Analysis of determinant factors of user acceptance of mobile payment system in indonesia (a case study of go-pay mobile payment). In 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). IEEE, 454–459.
  33. Service quality, trust, and patient satisfaction in interpersonal-based medical service encounters. BMC health services research 13, 1 (2013), 1–11.
  34. User trust in social networking services: A comparison of Facebook and LinkedIn. Computers in Human Behavior 69 (2017), 207–217.
  35. Cheng-Min Chao. 2019. Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 1652.
  36. Qian Qian Chen and Hyun Jung Park. 2021. How anthropomorphism affects trust in intelligent personal assistants. Industrial Management & Data Systems (2021).
  37. Development and evaluation of a healthy coping voice interface application using the Google home for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. In 2018 15th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 1–5.
  38. Developing a formative scale to measure consumers’ trust toward interaction with artificially intelligent (AI) social robots in service delivery. Computers in Human Behavior 118 (2021), 106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106700
  39. Eugene Cho. 2019. Hey Google, can I ask you something in private?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.
  40. Will Deleting History Make Alexa More Trustworthy? Effects of Privacy and Content Customization on User Experience of Smart Speakers. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376551
  41. Janghee Cho and Emilee Rader. 2020. The role of conversational grounding in supporting symbiosis between people and digital assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1–28.
  42. Jinsook E Cho and Haiyan Hu. 2009. The effect of service quality on trust and commitment varying across generations. International journal of consumer studies 33, 4 (2009), 468–476.
  43. SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com/
  44. Health and fitness apps for hands-free voice-activated assistants: content analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, 9 (2018), e9705.
  45. Jacob Cohen. 1992. A power primer. Psychological bulletin 112, 1 (1992), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  46. Exploring Acceptance and Consequences of the Internet of Things in the Home. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications. 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenCom.2012.32
  47. Henry Kudzanai Dambanemuya and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021. Auditing the Information Quality of News-Related Queries on the Alexa Voice Assistant. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–21.
  48. Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly (1989), 319–340.
  49. Interactive home healthcare system with integrated voice assistant. In 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). IEEE, 284–288.
  50. Trust in AutoML: exploring information needs for establishing trust in automated machine learning systems. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. 297–307.
  51. Aarthi Easwara Moorthy and Kim-Phuong L Vu. 2015. Privacy concerns for use of voice activated personal assistant in the public space. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 4 (2015), 307–335.
  52. SkillVet: Automated traceability analysis of Amazon Alexa skills. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (2021).
  53. Measuring Alexa Skill Privacy Practices across Three Years. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference (WWW). 670–680.
  54. Smart home personal assistants: a security and privacy review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 53, 6 (2020), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3412383
  55. José Manuel Ortega Egea and María Victoria Román González. 2011. Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: An extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1 (2011), 319–332.
  56. Application of artificial intelligence in the health care safety context: opportunities and challenges. American Journal of Medical Quality 35, 4 (2020), 341–348.
  57. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological review 114, 4 (2007), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
  58. Investigating the impacting factors for the healthcare professionals to adopt artificial intelligence-based medical diagnosis support system (AIMDSS). Annals of Operations Research 294, 1 (2020), 567–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2818-y
  59. Teresa Fernandes and Elisabete Oliveira. 2021. Understanding consumers’ acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption. Journal of Business Research 122 (2021), 180–191.
  60. Bias and Discrimination in AI: a cross-disciplinary perspective. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 40, 2 (2021), 72–80.
  61. Geraldine Fitzpatrick and Gunnar Ellingsen. 2013. A review of 25 years of CSCW research in healthcare: contributions, challenges and future agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22 (2013), 609–665.
  62. Jonas Foehr and Claas Christian Germelmann. 2020. Alexa, can I trust you? Exploring consumer paths to trust in smart voice-interaction technologies. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 5, 2 (2020), 181–205.
  63. Claes Fornell and David F Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research 18, 1 (1981), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  64. Alan Fox. 1974. Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. Faber & Faber.
  65. Frontiers. 2021. The Trustworthiness of Voice Assistants in the Context of Healthcare Investigating the Effect of Perceived Expertise on the Trustworthiness of Voice Assistants, Providers, Data Receivers, and Automatic Speech Recognition. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.685250/full
  66. Lingling Gao and Xuesong Bai. 2014. A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 26, 2 (2014), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061
  67. David Gefen and Detmar W Straub. 2004. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32, 6 (2004), 407–424.
  68. What we talk about when we talk about trust: Theory of trust for AI in healthcare. Intelligence-Based Medicine 1 (2020), 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2020.100001
  69. Paul AM Gregory and Zubin Austin. 2021. How do patients develop trust in community pharmacists? Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 17, 5 (2021), 911–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.023
  70. {{\{{SkillExplorer}}\}}: Understanding the Behavior of Skills in Large Scale. In 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 20). 2649–2666.
  71. Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management 49 (2019), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
  72. Preferences regarding external information sources: a conjoint analysis of visitors to Sardinia, Italy. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 34, 6 (2017), 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1237405
  73. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science 339, 6117 (2013), 321–324.
  74. Effects of explanation types and perceived risk on trust in autonomous vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 73 (2020), 271–280.
  75. A qualitative study to understand patient perspective on the use of artificial intelligence in radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology 16, 10 (2019), 1416–1419.
  76. Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition Pearson Prentice Hall: JOUR. (2009).
  77. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems 117, 3 (2017), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
  78. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). (2014).
  79. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice 19, 2 (2011), 139–152.
  80. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review (2019).
  81. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? The milbank quarterly 79, 4 (2001), 613–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00223
  82. Sangyeal Han and Heetae Yang. 2018. Understanding adoption of intelligent personal assistants: A parasocial relationship perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems 118, 3 (2018), 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0214
  83. Design of health information and communication technologies for older adults. In Design for Health. Elsevier, 341–363.
  84. Consumer trust and perceived risk for voice-controlled artificial intelligence: The case of Siri. Journal of Business Research 131 (2020), 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.012
  85. The Components of Trust for Collaborating With AI Colleagues. In Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Virtual Event, Taiwan) (CSCW’22 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3500868.3559450
  86. David J Hauser and Norbert Schwarz. 2016. Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior research methods 48, 1 (2016), 400–407.
  87. Erika C Hayden. 2013. Privacy loophole found in genetic databases. Nature News 17 (2013).
  88. Collaboration and trust in healthcare innovation: The eDiaMoND case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 14 (2005), 369–398.
  89. Artificial intelligence in skin cancer diagnostics: the patients’ perspective. Frontiers in medicine 7 (2020), 233.
  90. Kadircan H Keskinbora. 2019. Medical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence. Journal of clinical neuroscience 64 (2019), 277–282.
  91. Straightlining: overview of measurement, comparison of indicators, and effects in mail–web mixed-mode surveys. Social Science Computer Review 37, 2 (2019), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317752406
  92. Bran Knowles and Vicki L. Hanson. 2018. Older Adults’ Deployment of ‘Distrust’. 25, 4, Article 21 (aug 2018), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196490
  93. Models and patterns of trust. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 328–338.
  94. Responses of conversational agents to health and lifestyle prompts: investigation of appropriateness and presentation structures. Journal of medical Internet research 22, 2 (2020), e15823. https://doi.org/doi:10.2196/15823
  95. Ned Kock and Gary Lynn. 2012. Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for information Systems 13, 7 (2012).
  96. Yoon Jeon Koh and S Shyam Sundar. 2010. Effects of specialization in computers, web sites, and web agents on e-commerce trust. International journal of human-computer studies 68, 12 (2010), 899–912.
  97. Geir M Køien. 2011. Reflections on trust in devices: an informal survey of human trust in an internet-of-things context. Wireless personal communications 61, 3 (2011), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0386-4
  98. Sherrie YX Komiak and Izak Benbasat. 2006. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS quarterly 30, 4 (2006), 941–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148760
  99. Pascal Kowalczuk. 2018. Consumer acceptance of smart speakers: a mixed methods approach. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (2018).
  100. Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology. Psychology & Marketing 24, 12 (2007), 1059–1084.
  101. Electronic health record interactions through voice: a review. Applied clinical informatics 9, 3 (2018), 541.
  102. Human-AI collaboration in healthcare: A review and research agenda. (2021).
  103. CSCW and theSharing Economy: The Future of Platforms as Sites of Work Collaboration and Trust. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. 491–497.
  104. The PARK Framework for Automated Analysis of Parkinson’s Disease Characteristics. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 2, Article 54 (jun 2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328925
  105. Bibb Latané. 1981. The psychology of social impact. American psychologist 36, 4 (1981), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
  106. Alexa, are you listening? Privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–31.
  107. Chaiwoo Lee and Joseph F Coughlin. 2015. PERSPECTIVE: Older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32, 5 (2015), 747–759.
  108. DonHee Lee and Seong No Yoon. 2021. Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 1 (2021), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010271
  109. Min Kyung Lee and Katherine Rich. 2021. Who Is Included in Human Perceptions of AI?: Trust and Perceived Fairness around Healthcare AI and Cultural Mistrust. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
  110. Matthew KO Lee and Efraim Turban. 2001. A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of electronic commerce 6, 1 (2001), 75–91.
  111. Role of interaction quality and trust in use of AI-based voice-assistant systems. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 23, 2 (2021), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-07-2020-0132
  112. The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6, 2 (2000), 104.
  113. Measuring the effectiveness of privacy policies for voice assistant applications. In Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. 856–869.
  114. Understanding the role of privacy and trust in intelligent personal assistant adoption. In International Conference on Information, Vol. 11420. Springer, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_9
  115. Antecedents of customers’ acceptance of artificially intelligent robotic device use in hospitality services. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 29, 5 (2020), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1685053
  116. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The lancet digital health 1, 6 (2019), e271–e297.
  117. Chen Lou and Shupei Yuan. 2019. Influencer marketing: how message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising 19, 1 (2019), 58–73.
  118. Consumers and technology in a changing world. European Journal of Marketing 53, 6 (2019), 1038–1050.
  119. Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective. Information & management 48, 8 (2011), 393–403.
  120. Niklas Luhmann. 2001. Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. Reseaux 108, 4 (2001), 15–35.
  121. Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. Human factors 48, 2 (2006), 241–256.
  122. Can Humans Detect Malicious Always-Listening Assistants? A Framework for Crowdsourcing Test Drives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–28.
  123. A study about current digital assistants for healthcare and medical treatment monitoring. In 2021 IEEE 9th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health(SeGAH). 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEGAH52098.2021.9551864
  124. Winter Mason and Siddharth Suri. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods 44, 1 (2012), 1–23.
  125. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review 20, 3 (1995), 709–734.
  126. Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on management information systems (TMIS) 2, 2 (2011), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353
  127. Graeme McLean and Kofi Osei-Frimpong. 2019. Hey Alexa … examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior 99 (2019), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009
  128. Designing with gaze: Tama–a gaze activated smart-speaker. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–26.
  129. Owning and sharing: Privacy perceptions of smart speaker users. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–29.
  130. Stephanie M Merritt and Daniel R Ilgen. 2008. Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human factors 50, 2 (2008), 194–210.
  131. Smartphone-based conversational agents and responses to questions about mental health, interpersonal violence, and physical health. JAMA internal medicine 176, 5 (2016), 619–625.
  132. Empirically understanding trust in medical technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 4 (2009), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.01.004
  133. How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents. Electronic Markets 31, 2 (2021), 343–364.
  134. Bonnie M Muir and Neville Moray. 1996. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics 39, 3 (1996), 429–460.
  135. Collaborative appropriation: How couples, teams, groups and communities adapt and adopt technologies. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. 473–480.
  136. Is Trust Gender Biased? A Bibliometric Review of Trust in E-Commerce. Journal of Internet Commerce 21, 2 (2022), 217–245.
  137. Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study. Digital health 5 (2019), 2055207619871808.
  138. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. bmj 368 (2020).
  139. AI-based voice assistant systems: Evaluating from the interaction and trust perspectives. (2017).
  140. Patient perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence for skin cancer screening: a qualitative study. JAMA dermatology 156, 5 (2020), 501–512.
  141. Responses to addiction help-seeking from Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant, Cortana, and Bixby intelligent virtual assistants. NPJ digital medicine 3, 1 (2020), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0215-9
  142. Thomas P Novak and Donna L Hoffman. 2019. Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 47, 2 (2019), 216–237.
  143. Non-static nature of patient consent: shifting privacy perspectives in health information sharing. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 553–562.
  144. Patients’ views on the implementation of artificial intelligence in radiology: development and validation of a standardized questionnaire. European Radiology 30, 2 (2020), 1033–1040.
  145. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. The international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery 15, 1 (2019), e1968.
  146. Leonard J Paas and Meike Morren. 2018. Please do not answer if you are reading this: Respondent attention in online panels. Marketing Letters 29, 1 (2018), 13–21.
  147. Raja Parasuraman and Christopher A Miller. 2004. Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Commun. ACM 47, 4 (2004), 51–55.
  148. Beyond health literacy: supporting patient-provider communication during an emergency visit. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2179–2192.
  149. Identifying challenges and opportunities in human-AI collaboration in healthcare. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 506–510.
  150. Paul A Pavlou. 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce 7, 3 (2003), 101–134.
  151. Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods 46, 4 (2014), 1023–1031.
  152. Patient–Physician Interaction and Trust in Online Health Community: The role of perceived usefulness of health information and services. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, 1 (2020), 139.
  153. Goda Perlaviciute and Linda Steg. 2014. Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: integrated review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 35 (2014), 361–381.
  154. Valentina Pitardi and Hannah R Marriott. 2021. Alexa, she’s not human but… Unveiling the drivers of consumers’ trust in voice-based artificial intelligence. Psychology & Marketing 38, 4 (2021), 626–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21457
  155. Use of intelligent voice assistants by older adults with low technology use. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27, 4 (2020), 1–27.
  156. W Nicholson Price and I Glenn Cohen. 2019. Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nature medicine 25, 1 (2019), 37–43.
  157. Marianne Promberger and Jonathan Baron. 2006. Do patients trust computers? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19, 5 (2006), 455–468.
  158. Voicebot Research. 2022. Healthcare Voice Assistant Consumer Adoption Report. Technical Report. Voicebot Research. https://research.voicebot.ai/report-list/healthcare-voice-assistant-consumer-adoption-report-2022/
  159. Trust, perceived risk, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as factors related to mHealth technology use. Studies in health technology and informatics 216 (2015), 467.
  160. ”Hey Alexa, What’s Up?”: A Mixed-Methods Studies of In-Home Conversational Agent Usage. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196772
  161. Voice App Developer Experiences with Alexa and Google Assistant: Juggling Risks, Liability, and Security. In USENIX Security Symposium (SEC).
  162. Legal Obligation and Ethical Best Practice: Towards Meaningful Verbal Consent for Voice Assistants. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.
  163. William Seymour and Jose Such. 2023. Ignorance is Bliss? The Effect of Explanations on Perceptions of Voice Assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–24.
  164. William Seymour and Max Van Kleek. 2021. Exploring Interactions Between Trust, Anthropomorphism, and Relationship Development in Voice Assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–16.
  165. A systematic review of ethical concerns with voice assistants. In Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 131–145.
  166. Readiness for voice assistants to support healthcare delivery during a health crisis and pandemic. NPJ Digital Medicine 3, 1 (2020), 1–4.
  167. A scoping review of patient-facing, behavioral health interventions with voice assistant technology targeting self-management and healthy lifestyle behaviors. Translational Behavioral Medicine 10, 3 (2020), 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz141
  168. Capturing at-home health and care information for children with medical complexity using voice interactive technologies: multi-stakeholder viewpoint. Journal of medical Internet research 22, 2 (2020), e14202.
  169. Varinder M Sharma and Andreas Klein. 2020. Consumer perceived value, involvement, trust, susceptibility to interpersonal influence, and intention to participate in online group buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 52 (2020), 101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101946
  170. VerHealth: Vetting Medical Voice Applications through Policy Enforcement. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 4, Article 153 (dec 2020), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432233
  171. Osama Sohaib. 2021. Social networking services and social trust in social commerce: a PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM) 29, 2 (2021), 23–44.
  172. Clay Spinuzzi. 2005. The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication 52, 2 (2005), 163–174.
  173. Photo privacy conflicts in social media: A large-scale empirical study. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3821–3832.
  174. Jose M Such. 2017. Privacy and Autonomous Systems.. In Ijcai. 4761–4767.
  175. What if your avatar looks like you? Dual-congruity perspectives for avatar use. MIs Quarterly 35 (2011), 711–729. Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042805
  176. The Effect of Service Quality and Price Accuracy on Consumer Confidence and Implications for Sales Increase. PINISI Discretion Review 3, 2 (2019), 101–110.
  177. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader 56, 65 (1979), 9780203505984–16.
  178. Development issues of healthcare robots: Compassionate communication for older adults with dementia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 9 (2021), 4538.
  179. TechRepublic. 2020. Alexa Skills: Cheat Sheet. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/alexa-skills-cheat-sheet/
  180. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology 2, 2 (1995), 284–324.
  181. Eric J Topol. 2019. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature medicine 25, 1 (2019), 44–56.
  182. Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of service research 20, 1 (2017), 43–58.
  183. Intersectional Experiences of Unfair Treatment Caused by Automated Computational Systems. In PACM on Human-Computer Interaction - ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), Vol. 6. 1–30.
  184. Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing. Journal of Services Marketing (2019).
  185. Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017), 1687.
  186. Viswanath Venkatesh and Hillol Bala. 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences 39, 2 (2008), 273–315.
  187. Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science 46, 2 (2000), 186–204.
  188. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly (2003), 425–478.
  189. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly (2012), 157–178.
  190. ‘Okay google, what about my privacy?’: User’s privacy perceptions and acceptance of voice based digital assistants. Computers in Human Behavior 120 (2021), 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106763
  191. Machine learning and AI research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics and effectiveness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.10404 (2018).
  192. From human-human collaboration to Human-AI collaboration: Designing AI systems that can work together with people. In Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–6.
  193. Weiyu Wang and Keng Siau. 2018. Living with Artificial Intelligence–Developing a Theory on Trust in Health Chatbots. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Pre-ICIS Workshop on HCI Research in MIS.
  194. Paul Ward. 2018. Trust and communication in a doctor-patient relationship: a literature review. Arch Med 3, 3 (2018), 36. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100146
  195. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of experimental social psychology 52 (2014), 113–117.
  196. Designing a spoken dialogue interface to an intelligent cognitive assistant for people with dementia. Health informatics journal 22, 4 (2016), 854–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215593329
  197. Falling in love with online games: The uses and gratifications perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1862–1871.
  198. How different types of users develop trust in technology: A qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology. Applied ergonomics 45, 6 (2014), 1495–1503.
  199. T Yan. 2008. Nondifferentiation. Encyclopedia of survey research methods 2 (2008), 520–521.
  200. Zheng Yan and Silke Holtmanns. 2008. Trust modeling and management: from social trust to digital trust. In Computer security, privacy and politics: current issues, challenges and solutions. IGI Global, 290–323.
  201. Clinical Advice by Voice Assistants on Postpartum Depression: Cross-Sectional Investigation Using Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Microsoft Cortana. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9, 1 (2021), e24045. https://doi.org/10.2196/24045
  202. Privacy Perceptions and Designs of Bystanders in Smart Homes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 59 (nov 2019), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359161
  203. Robert K Yin. 2013. Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation 19, 3 (2013), 321–332.
  204. Artificial intelligence is trusted less than a doctor in medical treatment decisions: Influence of perceived care and value similarity. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37, 10 (2021), 981–990.
  205. Sangseok You and Lionel Robert. 2017. Emotional attachment, performance, and viability in teams collaborating with embodied physical action (EPA) robots. You, S. and Robert, LP (2018). Emotional Attachment, Performance, and Viability in Teams Collaborating with Embodied Physical Action (EPA) Robots, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 19, 5 (2017), 377–407. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00496
  206. Patient and general public attitudes towards clinical artificial intelligence: a mixed methods systematic review. The Lancet Digital Health 3, 9 (2021), e599–e611.
  207. {{\{{SkillDetective}}\}}: Automated {{\{{Policy-Violation}}\}} Detection of Voice Assistant Applications in the Wild. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22).
  208. A model for governing information sharing in smart assistants. In Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 845–855.
  209. Privacy-enhanced Personal Assistants based on Dialogues and Case Similarity. In European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Press.
  210. Runting Zhong and Mengyao Ma. 2022. Effects of communication style, anthropomorphic setting and individual differences on older adults using voice assistants in a health context. BMC geriatrics 22, 1 (2022), 1–13.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Xiao Zhan (14 papers)
  2. Noura Abdi (3 papers)
  3. William Seymour (22 papers)
  4. Jose Such (24 papers)
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now