Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Data assimilation and parameter identification for water waves using the nonlinear Schrödinger equation and physics-informed neural networks (2401.03708v1)

Published 8 Jan 2024 in physics.flu-dyn and cs.LG

Abstract: The measurement of deep water gravity wave elevations using in-situ devices, such as wave gauges, typically yields spatially sparse data. This sparsity arises from the deployment of a limited number of gauges due to their installation effort and high operational costs. The reconstruction of the spatio-temporal extent of surface elevation poses an ill-posed data assimilation problem, challenging to solve with conventional numerical techniques. To address this issue, we propose the application of a physics-informed neural network (PINN), aiming to reconstruct physically consistent wave fields between two designated measurement locations several meters apart. Our method ensures this physical consistency by integrating residuals of the hydrodynamic nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation (NLSE) into the PINN's loss function. Using synthetic wave elevation time series from distinct locations within a wave tank, we initially achieve successful reconstruction quality by employing constant, predetermined NLSE coefficients. However, the reconstruction quality is further improved by introducing NLSE coefficients as additional identifiable variables during PINN training. The results not only showcase a technically relevant application of the PINN method but also represent a pioneering step towards improving the initialization of deterministic wave prediction methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (70)
  1. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research 18, 1–43. URL: http://jmlr.org/papers/v18/17-468.html.
  2. Similarity of the wind wave spectrum in finite depth water: 1. spectral form. Journal of Geophysical Research 90, 975–986. doi:10.1029/JC090iC01p00975.
  3. Physics-informed neural networks (pinns) for fluid mechanics: a review. Acta Mechanica Sinica 37, 1727–1738. doi:10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1.
  4. Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems. Journal of Heat Transfer 143, 060801.
  5. The hydrodynamic nonlinear schrödinger equation: Space and time. Fluids 1. doi:10.3390/fluids1030023.
  6. Rogue wave observation in a water wave tank. Physical Review Letters 106, 204502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.204502.
  7. Simultaneous mapping of nearshore bathymetry and waves based on physics-informed deep learning. Coastal Engineering 183, 104337. doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2023.104337.
  8. Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in nano-optics and metamaterials. Optics express 28, 11618–11633. doi:10.1364/OE.384875.
  9. Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface Waves. World Scientific. doi:10.1142/5566.
  10. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next. Journal of Scientific Computing 92. doi:10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z.
  11. Reconstruction of Ocean Surfaces From Randomly Distributed Measurements Using a Grid-Based Method. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Volume 6: Ocean Engineering. doi:10.1115/OMAE2021-62409.
  12. Nonlinear Reconstruction and Prediction of Regular Waves. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Volume 5B: Ocean Engineering; Honoring Symposium for Professor Günther F. Clauss on Hydrodynamics and Ocean Engineering. doi:10.1115/OMAE2022-78988.
  13. Note on a modification to the nonlinear schrödinger equation for application to deep water waves. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 369, 105–114. doi:10.1098/rspa.1979.0154.
  14. Evolution of a narrow-band spectrum of random surface gravity waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 478, 1–10. doi:10.1017/S0022112002002616.
  15. Machine learning for phase-resolved reconstruction of nonlinear ocean wave surface elevations from sparse remote sensing data. Ocean Engineering 288, 116059. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116059.
  16. Physics-informed neural networks of the saint-venant equations for downscaling a large-scale river model. Water Resources Research 59, e2022WR033168. doi:10.1029/2022WR033168.
  17. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, in: Teh, Y.W., Titterington, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, Chia Laguna Resort, Sardinia, Italy. pp. 249–256. URL: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v9/glorot10a.html.
  18. Solving nonlinear soliton equations using improved physics-informed neural networks with adaptive mechanisms. Communications in Theoretical Physics 75, 095003. doi:10.1088/1572-9494/accb8d.
  19. Nonlinear Modulation of Gravity Waves. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 33, 805–811. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.33.805.
  20. Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the joint north sea wave project (jonswap). Ergänzung zur Deutschen Hydrographischen Zeitschrift, Reihe A (8) 12, 1–95.
  21. A new view of nonlinear water waves: The hilbert spectrum. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 31, 417–457. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.417.
  22. Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks. Journal of Computational Physics 404, 109136. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109136.
  23. Locally adaptive activation functions with slope recovery for deep and physics-informed neural networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 476, 20200334. doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0334.
  24. Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 365, 113028. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113028.
  25. Deep learning of inverse water waves problems using multi-fidelity data: Application to serre–green–naghdi equations. Ocean Engineering 248, 110775. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110775.
  26. Physics-informed neural network for nonlinear dynamics in fiber optics. Laser & Photonics Reviews 16, 2100483. doi:10.1002/lpor.202100483.
  27. Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 422–440. doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5.
  28. Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences 379, 20200093. doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0093.
  29. Real-time phase-resolved ocean wave prediction in directional wave fields: Enhanced algorithm and experimental validation. Ocean Engineering 276, 114212. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114212.
  30. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, in: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015), pp. 1–15. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980.
  31. Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4d flow mri data using physics-informed neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 358, 112623. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112623.
  32. On the deterministic prediction of water waves. Fluids 5. doi:10.3390/fluids5010009.
  33. Application of Machine Learning for the Generation of Tailored Wave Sequences. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Volume 5B: Ocean Engineering; Honoring Symposium for Professor Günther F. Clauss on Hydrodynamics and Ocean Engineering. doi:10.1115/OMAE2022-78601.
  34. Solving forward and inverse problems of the nonlinear schrödinger equation with the generalized pt-symmetric scarf-ii potential via pinn deep learning. Communications in Theoretical Physics 73, 125001. doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac2055.
  35. On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming 45, 503–528. doi:10.1007/BF01589116.
  36. Deterministic wave prediction model for irregular long-crested waves with recurrent neural network. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science doi:10.1016/j.joes.2022.08.002.
  37. The influence of characteristic sea state parameters on the accuracy of irregular wave field simulations of different complexity. Fluids 7. doi:10.3390/fluids7070243.
  38. The old and the new: Can physics-informed deep-learning replace traditional linear solvers? Frontiers in Big Data 4. doi:10.3389/fdata.2021.669097.
  39. Self-adaptive physics-informed neural networks using a soft attention mechanism. arXiv:2009.04544.
  40. Rapid phase-resolved prediction of nonlinear dispersive waves using machine learning. Applied Ocean Research 117, 102920. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2021.102920.
  41. A deep energy method for finite deformation hyperelasticity. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 80, 103874. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103874.
  42. Nonlinear Ocean Wave and the Inverse Scattering Transform. volume 97. Academic Press, Amsterdam.
  43. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc.. pp. 8024–8035. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/bdbca288fee7f92f2bfa9f7012727740-Paper.pdf.
  44. A robust quantitative comparison criterion of two signals based on the sobolev norm of their difference. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 101, 115–124. doi:10.1007/s10665-016-9849-7.
  45. Solving localized wave solutions of the derivative nonlinear schrödinger equation using an improved pinn method. Nonlinear Dynamics 105, 1723–1739. doi:10.1007/s11071-021-06554-5.
  46. Soliton, breather, and rogue wave solutions for solving the nonlinear schrödinger equation using a deep learning method with physical constraints*. Chinese Physics B 30, 060202. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abd7e3.
  47. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics 378, 686–707. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045.
  48. Physics informed deep learning (part ii): Data-driven discovery of nonlinear partial differential equations. arXiv:1711.10566.
  49. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations. Science (New York, N.Y.) 367, 1026–1030. doi:10.1126/science.aaw4741.
  50. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for wave propagation and full waveform inversions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 127. doi:10.1029/2021jb023120.
  51. On the convergence of adam and beyond. International Conference on Learning Representations URL: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=ryQu7f-RZ.
  52. Gaussian variational ansatz in the problem of anomalous sea waves: Comparison with direct numerical simulation. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 120, 925–932. doi:10.1134/s1063776115050179.
  53. Experiments on nonlinear wave groups in intermediate water depth. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 124, 320–327. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1998)124:6(320).
  54. Physics-informed neural network for ultrasound nondestructive quantification of surface breaking cracks. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 39, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10921-020-00705-1.
  55. Hurricane wind waves—a discrete spectral model. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 112, 370–389. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1986)112:3(370).
  56. Application Note: Practical use of the “Hilbert transform”. Technical Report. Brüel & Kjær. URL: https://www.bksv.com/media/doc/bo0437.pdf.
  57. A modified nonlinear schrödinger equation for broader bandwidth gravity waves on deep water. Wave Motion 24, 281–289. doi:10.1016/S0165-2125(96)00020-0.
  58. Spatial evolution of water surface waves: Numerical simulation and experiment of bichromatic waves, in: ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE. pp. ISOPE–I.
  59. Data-driven rogue waves and parameter discovery in the defocusing nonlinear schrödinger equation with a potential using the pinn deep learning. Physics Letters A 404, 127408. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127408.
  60. Reconstruction of nearshore wave fields based on physics-informed neural networks. Coastal Engineering 176, 104167. doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104167.
  61. Surface similarity parameter: A new machine learning loss metric for oscillatory spatio-temporal data. Neural Networks 156, 123–134. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.09.023.
  62. Machine learning simulation of one-dimensional deterministic water wave propagation. Ocean Engineering 284, 115222. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115222.
  63. A new numerical method for surface hydrodynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 92, 11803–11824. doi:10.1029/JC092iC11p11803.
  64. Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and environmental systems. arXiv:2003.04919.
  65. Nonlinear Dynamics of Deep-Water Gravity Waves. volume 22 of Advances in Applied Mechanics. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70066-8.
  66. Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 9, 190–194. doi:10.1007/BF00913182.
  67. Wave-packet behaviors of the defocusing nonlinear schrödinger equation based on the modified physics-informed neural networks. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 31, 113107. doi:10.1063/5.0067260.
  68. Sea surface reconstruction from marine radar images using deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science doi:10.1016/j.joes.2023.09.002.
  69. A physics-informed machine learning approach for solving heat transfer equation in advanced manufacturing and engineering applications. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 101, 104232. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104232.
  70. Correcting model misspecification in physics-informed neural networks (pinns). arXiv:2310.10776.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.