Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PAHD: Perception-Action based Human Decision Making using Explainable Graph Neural Networks on SAR Images (2401.02687v1)

Published 5 Jan 2024 in cs.CV, cs.LG, and eess.IV

Abstract: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images are commonly utilized in military applications for automatic target recognition (ATR). Machine learning (ML) methods, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Graph Neural Networks (GNN), are frequently used to identify ground-based objects, including battle tanks, personnel carriers, and missile launchers. Determining the vehicle class, such as the BRDM2 tank, BMP2 tank, BTR60 tank, and BTR70 tank, is crucial, as it can help determine whether the target object is an ally or an enemy. While the ML algorithm provides feedback on the recognized target, the final decision is left to the commanding officers. Therefore, providing detailed information alongside the identified target can significantly impact their actions. This detailed information includes the SAR image features that contributed to the classification, the classification confidence, and the probability of the identified object being classified as a different object type or class. We propose a GNN-based ATR framework that provides the final classified class and outputs the detailed information mentioned above. This is the first study to provide a detailed analysis of the classification class, making final decisions more straightforward. Moreover, our GNN framework achieves an overall accuracy of 99.2\% when evaluated on the MSTAR dataset, improving over previous state-of-the-art GNN methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. Adadi, A. and Berrada, M., “Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai),” IEEE Access 6, 52138–52160 (2018).
  2. Su, S., Cui, Z., Guo, W., Zhang, Z., and Yu, W., “Explainable analysis of deep learning methods for sar image classification,” (2022).
  3. Huang, Z., Yao, X., Liu, Y., Dumitru, C. O., Datcu, M., and Han, J., “Physically explainable CNN for SAR image classification,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 190, 25–37 (aug 2022).
  4. Liu, X., He, C., Xiong, D., and Liao, M., “Pattern statistics network for classification of high-resolution sar images,” Remote Sensing 11(16) (2019).
  5. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S. E., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A., “Going deeper with convolutions,” CoRR abs/1409.4842 (2014).
  6. Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., and Leskovec, J., “Inductive representation learning on large graphs,” in [Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems ], NIPS’17, 1025–1035, Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA (2017).
  7. Kaempf, G., Klein, G., Thordsen, M., and Wolf, S., “Decision making in complex naval command-and-control environments,” Human Factors 38, 220–231 (06 1996).
  8. Grassia, M., De Domenico, M., and Mangioni, G., “mgnn: Generalizing the graph neural networks to the multilayer case,” (2021).
  9. Rai, A., “Explainable ai: From black box to glass box,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 48, 137–141 (2020).
  10. Došilović, F. K., Brčić, M., and Hlupić, N., “Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey,” in [2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) ], 0210–0215 (2018).
  11. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., and Kweon, I. S., “Cbam: Convolutional block attention module,” (2018).
  12. Tibshirani, R., “Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58(1), 267–288 (1996).
  13. Tu, S., Su, Y., Wang, W., Xiong, B., and Li, Y., “Automatic target recognition scheme for a high-resolution and large-scale synthetic aperture radar image,” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 9, 096039 (06 2015).
  14. Hu, F.-m., Zhang, P., Yang, R.-l., and Fan, X.-h., “Sar target recognition based on gabor filter and sub-block statistical feature,” in [2009 IET International Radar Conference ], 1–4 (2009).
  15. Zhang, M., An, J., Yu, D. H., Yang, L. D., Wu, L., and Lu, X. Q., “Convolutional neural network with attention mechanism for sar automatic target recognition,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 19, 1–5 (2022).
  16. Morgan, D. A. E., “Deep convolutional neural networks for ATR from SAR imagery,” in [Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery XXII ], Zelnio, E. and Garber, F. D., eds., 9475, 94750F, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2015).
  17. Ying, Z., Xuan, C., Zhai, Y., Sun, B., Li, J., Deng, W., Mai, C., Wang, F., Labati, R. D., Piuri, V., and Scotti, F., “TAI-SARNET: Deep Transferred Atrous-Inception CNN for Small Samples SAR ATR,” Sensors 20, 1724 (Mar. 2020).
  18. Pei, J., Huang, Y., Huo, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., and Yeo, T.-S., “Sar automatic target recognition based on multiview deep learning framework,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 56(4), 2196–2210 (2018).
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets