Long-term Fairness For Real-time Decision Making: A Constrained Online Optimization Approach (2401.02552v1)
Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has demonstrated remarkable capabilities across many real-world systems, from predictive modeling to intelligent automation. However, the widespread integration of machine learning also makes it necessary to ensure machine learning-driven decision-making systems do not violate ethical principles and values of society in which they operate. As ML-driven decisions proliferate, particularly in cases involving sensitive attributes such as gender, race, and age, to name a few, the need for equity and impartiality has emerged as a fundamental concern. In situations demanding real-time decision-making, fairness objectives become more nuanced and complex: instantaneous fairness to ensure equity in every time slot, and long-term fairness to ensure fairness over a period of time. There is a growing awareness that real-world systems that operate over long periods and require fairness over different timelines. However, existing approaches mainly address dynamic costs with time-invariant fairness constraints, often disregarding the challenges posed by time-varying fairness constraints. To bridge this gap, this work introduces a framework for ensuring long-term fairness within dynamic decision-making systems characterized by time-varying fairness constraints. We formulate the decision problem with fairness constraints over a period as a constrained online optimization problem. A novel online algorithm, named LoTFair, is presented that solves the problem 'on the fly'. We prove that LoTFair can make overall fairness violations negligible while maintaining the performance over the long run.
- E. L. Lee, J.-K. Lou, W.-M. Chen, Y.-C. Chen, S.-D. Lin, Y.-S. Chiang, and K.-T. Chen, “Fairness-aware loan recommendation for microfinance services,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing, 2014, p. 1–4.
- S. Bird, K. Kenthapadi, E. Kiciman, and M. Mitchell, “Fairness-aware machine learning: Practical challenges and lessons learned,” in Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2019, p. 834–835.
- A. Yan and B. Howe, “Fairness-aware demand prediction for new mobility,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 01, pp. 1079–1087, Apr. 2020.
- T. Si Salem, G. Iosifidis, and G. Neglia, “Enabling long-term fairness in dynamic resource allocation,” Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–36, 2022.
- Z. Guo, W. Wei, L. Chen, Z. Wang, J. P. Catalão, and S. Mei, “Optimal energy management of a residential prosumer: A robust data-driven dynamic programming approach,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1548–1557, 2020.
- Z. Guo, W. Wei, M. Shahidehpour, Z. Wang, and S. Mei, “Optimisation methods for dispatch and control of energy storage with renewable integration,” IET Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 137–160, 2022.
- S. Corbett-Davies, E. Pierson, A. Feller, S. Goel, and A. Huq, “Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness,” in Proceedings of the 23rd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2017, pp. 797–806.
- X. Zhang and M. Liu, “Fairness in learning-based sequential decision algorithms: A survey,” in Handbook of Reinforcement Learning and Control. Springer, 2021, pp. 525–555.
- A. D’Amour, H. Srinivasan, J. Atwood, P. Baljekar, D. Sculley, and Y. Halpern, “Fairness is not static: deeper understanding of long term fairness via simulation studies,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2020, pp. 525–534.
- Y. Hu and L. Zhang, “Achieving long-term fairness in sequential decision making,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 9, 2022, pp. 9549–9557.
- A. Weber, B. Metevier, Y. Brun, P. S. Thomas, and B. C. da Silva, “Enforcing delayed-impact fairness guarantees,” 2022.
- T. Yin, R. Raab, M. Liu, and Y. Liu, “Long-term fairness with unknown dynamics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09362, 2023.
- E. Oh and S.-Y. Son, “Peer-to-peer energy transaction mechanisms considering fairness in smart energy communities,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020.
- L. Robert, G. Bansal, and C. Lutge, “Icis 2019 sighci workshop panel report: Human computer interaction challenges and opportunities for fair, trustworthy and ethical artificial intelligence,” 2020.
- C. Dwork, M. Hardt, T. Pitassi, O. Reingold, and R. Zemel, “Fairness through awareness,” in Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference, 2012, pp. 214–226.
- P.-T. De Boer, D. P. Kroese, S. Mannor, and R. Y. Rubinstein, “A tutorial on the cross-entropy method,” Annals of operations research, vol. 134, pp. 19–67, 2005.
- S. Mannor, D. Peleg, and R. Rubinstein, “The cross entropy method for classification,” in Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, 2005, pp. 561–568.
- C.-Y. Chuang and Y. Mroueh, “Fair mixup: Fairness via interpolation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06503, 2021.
- X. Han, Z. Jiang, H. Jin, Z. Liu, N. Zou, Q. Wang, and X. Hu, “Retiring ΔΔ\Deltaroman_ΔDP : New distribution-level metrics for demographic parity,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023.
- C. Park and T. Yong, “Comparative review and discussion on p2p electricity trading,” Energy Procedia, vol. 128, pp. 3–9, 2017, international Scientific Conference “Environmental and Climate Technologies”, CONECT 2017, 10-12 May 2017, Riga, Latvia.
- T. Sousa, T. Soares, P. Pinson, F. Moret, T. Baroche, and E. Sorin, “Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 104, pp. 367–378, 2019.
- Y. Liu, L. Wu, and J. Li, “Peer-to-peer (p2p) electricity trading in distribution systems of the future,” The Electricity Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2–6, 2019, special Issue on Strategies for a sustainable, reliable and resilient grid.
- A. Mokhtari, S. Shahrampour, A. Jadbabaie, and A. Ribeiro, “Online optimization in dynamic environments: Improved regret rates for strongly convex problems,” in 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 2016, pp. 7195–7201.
- T. Chen, Q. Ling, and G. B. Giannakis, “An online convex optimization approach to proactive network resource allocation,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 24, pp. 6350–6364, 2017.
- M. Liu and G. Gross, “Role of distribution factors in congestion revenue rights applications,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 802–810, 2004.
- M. Khorasany, Y. Mishra, and G. Ledwich, “A decentralized bilateral energy trading system for peer-to-peer electricity markets,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 4646–4657, 2020.
- A. Paudel, L. P. M. I. Sampath, J. Yang, and H. B. Gooi, “Peer-to-peer energy trading in smart grid considering power losses and network fees,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 4727–4737, 2020.
- Ruijie Du (7 papers)
- Deepan Muthirayan (29 papers)
- Pramod P. Khargonekar (33 papers)
- Yanning Shen (44 papers)