Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DISO: A Domain Ontology for Modeling Dislocations in Crystalline Materials (2401.02540v1)

Published 4 Jan 2024 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci and cs.AI

Abstract: Crystalline materials, such as metals and semiconductors, nearly always contain a special defect type called dislocation. This defect decisively determines many important material properties, e.g., strength, fracture toughness, or ductility. Over the past years, significant effort has been put into understanding dislocation behavior across different length scales via experimental characterization techniques and simulations. This paper introduces the dislocation ontology (DISO), which defines the concepts and relationships related to linear defects in crystalline materials. We developed DISO using a top-down approach in which we start defining the most general concepts in the dislocation domain and subsequent specialization of them. DISO is published through a persistent URL following W3C best practices for publishing Linked Data. Two potential use cases for DISO are presented to illustrate its usefulness in the dislocation dynamics domain. The evaluation of the ontology is performed in two directions, evaluating the success of the ontology in modeling a real-world domain and the richness of the ontology.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. The EMMC Roadmap for Materials Modelling and Digitalisation of the Materials Sciences. (Nov 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4272033
  2. Enabling strain hardening simulations with dislocation dynamics. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 15, 6 (2007), 553.
  3. Toshihiro Ashino. 2010. Materials ontology: An infrastructure for exchanging materials information and knowledge. Data Science Journal 9 (2010), 54–61.
  4. Cooking HTTP content negotiation with Vapour. In Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web (SFSW2008), Vol. 72. Citeseer.
  5. Carl Boettiger. 2018. rdflib: A high level wrapper around the redland package for common rdf applications. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1098478
  6. Modeling crystal plasticity with dislocation dynamics simulations: The ‘microMegas’ code. Mechanics of Nano-objects 1 (2011), 81–100.
  7. Towards the semantic formalization of science. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 2057–2059.
  8. EVENTSKG: A 5-star dataset of top-ranked events in eight computer science communities. In European semantic web conference. Springer, 427–442.
  9. SemSur: A Core Ontology for the Semantic Representation of Research Findings. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Semantic Systems, SEMANTICS 2018, Vienna, Austria, September 10-13, 2018 (2018-01-01) (Procedia Computer Science), Vol. 137. Elsevier, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.09.015
  10. SEO: A Scientific Events Data Model. In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019, Chiara Ghidini, Olaf Hartig, Maria Maleshkova, Vojtěch Svátek, Isabel Cruz, Aidan Hogan, Jie Song, Maxime Lefrançois, and Fabien Gandon (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 79–95.
  11. Why are ontologies not reused across the same domain? Journal of Web Semantics 57 (2019), 100492.
  12. Nasr M Ghoniem and LZ Sun. 1999. Fast-sum method for the elastic field of three-dimensional dislocation ensembles. Physical Review B 60, 1 (1999), 128.
  13. Sydney R Hall and Brian McMahon. 2016. The implementation and evolution of STAR/CIF ontologies: Interoperability and preservation of structured data. Data Science Journal 15 (2016).
  14. Qudt-quantities, units, dimensions and data types ontologies. USA Available http://qudt. org March 156 (2014).
  15. Steps towards a dislocation ontology for crystalline materials. In 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Twins, SeDiT 2021, Vol. 2887. CEUR-WS.
  16. The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Materials 1, 1 (2013), 011002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323
  17. Digital Transformation in Materials Science: A Paradigm Change in Material’s Development. Advanced Materials 33, 8 (2021), 2004940. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004940 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adma.202004940
  18. Ontology engineering methodologies for the evolution of living and reused ontologies: status, trends, findings and recommendations. The Knowledge Engineering Review 35 (2020).
  19. Rhys Lewis. 2007. Dereferencing http uris. Draft Tag Finding, http://www.w3.org/ 2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/2007-05-31/HttpRange-14.html (2007).
  20. An Ontology for the Materials Design Domain. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 212–227.
  21. Egon Orowan. 1934. Zur Kristallplastizität. Zeitschrift für Physik 89, 9-10 (1934), 605–613.
  22. Giacomo Po and Nasr Ghoniem. 2014. A variational formulation of constrained dislocation dynamics coupled with heat and vacancy diffusion. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 66 (2014), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.01.012
  23. Michael Polanyi. 1934. Über eine Art Gitterstörung, die einen Kristall plastisch machen könnte. Zeitschrift für Physik 89, 9-10 (1934), 660–664.
  24. A. Prakash and S. Sandfeld. 2018. Chances and Challenges in Fusing Data Science with Materials Science. Practical Metallography 55, 8 (2018), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.3139/147.110539
  25. Machine learning plastic deformation of crystals. Nature communications 9, 1 (2018), 1–7.
  26. Stefan Sandfeld and Giacomo Po. 2015. Microstructural comparison of the kinematics of discrete and continuum dislocations models. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 23, 8 (2015), 085003.
  27. Semantic representation of physics research data. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Vol. 2. Setúbal, Portugal: Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
  28. Ontology design for pharmaceutical research outcomes. In International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. Springer, 119–132.
  29. Ontology metadata for ontology reuse. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 6, 2 (2011), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2011.046579
  30. Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate. Data Science Preprint (2021), 1–42.
  31. dREL: a relational expression language for dictionary methods. Journal of chemical information and modeling 52, 8 (2012), 1917–1925.
  32. Machine Learning-Based Classification of Dislocation Microstructures. Frontiers in Materials 6 (2019), 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.00141
  33. OntoQA: Metric-based ontology quality analysis. (2005).
  34. Geoffrey Ingram Taylor. 1934. The mechanism of plastic deformation of crystals. Part I.–Theoretical. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 145, 855 (1934), 362–387.
  35. The Plinius ontology of ceramic materials. In Eleventh European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’94) Workshop on Comparison of Implemented Ontologies. 8–12.
  36. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data 3, 1 (2016), 1–9.
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets