Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

User authentication system based on human exhaled breath physics (2401.02447v1)

Published 2 Jan 2024 in cs.CR and cs.LG

Abstract: This work, in a pioneering approach, attempts to build a biometric system that works purely based on the fluid mechanics governing exhaled breath. We test the hypothesis that the structure of turbulence in exhaled human breath can be exploited to build biometric algorithms. This work relies on the idea that the extrathoracic airway is unique for every individual, making the exhaled breath a biomarker. Methods including classical multi-dimensional hypothesis testing approach and machine learning models are employed in building user authentication algorithms, namely user confirmation and user identification. A user confirmation algorithm tries to verify whether a user is the person they claim to be. A user identification algorithm tries to identify a user's identity with no prior information available. A dataset of exhaled breath time series samples from 94 human subjects was used to evaluate the performance of these algorithms. The user confirmation algorithms performed exceedingly well for the given dataset with over $97\%$ true confirmation rate. The machine learning based algorithm achieved a good true confirmation rate, reiterating our understanding of why machine learning based algorithms typically outperform classical hypothesis test based algorithms. The user identification algorithm performs reasonably well with the provided dataset with over $50\%$ of the users identified as being within two possible suspects. We show surprisingly unique turbulent signatures in the exhaled breath that have not been discovered before. In addition to discussions on a novel biometric system, we make arguments to utilise this idea as a tool to gain insights into the morphometric variation of extrathoracic airway across individuals. Such tools are expected to have future potential in the area of personalised medicines.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. BreathPrint: Breathing Acoustics-Based User Authentication. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. MobiSys ’17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 278–291.
  2. Breathprinting reveals malaria-associated biomarkers and mosquito attractants. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2018;217(10):1553–1560.
  3. A European Respiratory Society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease. European Respiratory Journal. 2017;49(4).
  4. Taking your breath away: metabolomics breathes life in to personalized medicine. Trends in biotechnology. 2014;32(10):538–548.
  5. Single exhaled breath metabolomic analysis identifies unique breathprint in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;61(13):1463–1464.
  6. Diabetes identification and classification by means of a breath analysis system. In: International conference on medical biometrics. Springer; 2010. p. 52–63.
  7. Exhaled breath analysis: a review of ‘breath-taking’methods for off-line analysis. Metabolomics. 2017;13(10):1–16.
  8. Mashir A, Dweik RA. Exhaled breath analysis: the new interface between medicine and engineering. Advanced Powder Technology. 2009;20(5):420–425.
  9. Breath analysis as a potential and non-invasive frontier in disease diagnosis: an overview. Metabolites. 2015;5(1):3–55.
  10. Das S, Pal M. Non-invasive monitoring of human health by exhaled breath analysis: A comprehensive review. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2020;167(3):037562.
  11. Inspiratory flow pattern in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1984;57(4):1111–1119.
  12. Painter R, Cuningham D. Analyses of human respiratory flow patterns. Respiration physiology. 1992;87(3):293–307.
  13. Application of the hot-wire anemometer to respiratory measurements in small animal. Journal of applied physiology. 1976;40(2):275–277.
  14. Evaluation of a constant-temperature hot-wire anemometer for respiratory-gas-flow measurements. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1979;17(2):211–215.
  15. Architectures of anemometers using the electric equivalence principle. In: IMTC/2002. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37276). vol. 1; 2002. p. 397–401 vol.1.
  16. Breathing flow measurement with constant temperature hot-wire anemometer for forced oscillations technique. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37510). vol. 1. IEEE; 2004. p. 730–733.
  17. A virtual instrument for measurement of expiratory parameters. In: IMTC/2002. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37276). vol. 2; 2002. p. 1255–1258 vol.2.
  18. Measuring the exhaled breath of a manikin and human subjects. Indoor Air. 2015;25(2):188–197.
  19. Hot-wire anemometer for spirography. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 1998;36(1):17–21.
  20. Breathing-based authentication on resource-constrained iot devices using recurrent neural networks. Computer. 2018;51(5):60–67.
  21. UbiBreathe: A ubiquitous non-invasive WiFi-based breathing estimator. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing; 2015. p. 277–286.
  22. Continuous user verification via respiratory biometrics. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE; 2020. p. 1–10.
  23. I Sense You by Breath: Speaker Recognition via Breath Biometrics. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing. 2020;17(2):306–319.
  24. Hurst HE. Long-Term Storage Capacity of Reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers. 1951;116:770–799.
  25. Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2002;316(1-4):87–114.
  26. Sreenivasan KR. Fractals and Multifractals in Fluid Turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 1991;23(1):539–604.
  27. Ihlen E. Introduction to Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis in Matlab. Frontiers in Physiology. 2012;3.
  28. Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. Phys Rev E. 1994;49:1685–1689.
  29. Massey FJ. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1951;46(253):68–78.
  30. Pitfalls in fractal time series analysis: fMRI BOLD as an exemplary case. Frontiers in Physiology. 2012;3.
  31. Wavelet-based multifractal analysis of fMRI time series. NeuroImage. 2004;22(3):1195–1202.
  32. Multivariate multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of 3D wind field signals. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2018;490:513–523.
  33. Time Series FeatuRe Extraction on basis of Scalable Hypothesis tests (tsfresh – A Python package). Neurocomputing. 2018;307:72–77.
  34. Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5–32.
  35. Fürnkranz J. Round Robin Classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2002;2(4):721–747.
  36. A review on the combination of binary classifiers in multiclass problems. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2008;30(1-4):19–37.
  37. An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: Experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes. Pattern Recognition. 2011;44(8):1761–1776.
  38. Class binarization to neuroevolution for multiclass classification. Neural Computing and Applications. 2022;34(22):19845–19862.
  39. Hotelling H. The Generalization of Student’s Ratio. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1931;2(3):360–378.
  40. Classification of particle trajectories in living cells: Machine learning versus statistical testing hypothesis for fractional anomalous diffusion. Phys Rev E. 2020;102:032402.
  41. Instance-Based Classification Through Hypothesis Testing. IEEE Access. 2021;9:17485–17494.
  42. Li JJ, Tong X. Statistical Hypothesis Testing versus Machine Learning Binary Classification: Distinctions and Guidelines. Patterns. 2020;1(7):100115.
  43. Ng AY, Jordan MI. On Discriminative vs. Generative Classifiers: A Comparison of Logistic Regression and Naive Bayes. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems: Natural and Synthetic. NIPS’01. MIT Press; 2001. p. 841–848.
  44. Algorithms for Hyper-Parameter Optimization. In: Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel R, Bartlett P, Pereira F, Weinberger KQ, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 24. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2011.
  45. Making a Science of Model Search: Hyperparameter Optimization in Hundreds of Dimensions for Vision Architectures. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 28. ICML’13. JMLR.org; 2013. p. I–115–I–123.
  46. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2. NIPS’12. Curran Associates Inc.; 2012. p. 2951–2959.
  47. Belete DM, Huchaiah MD. Grid search in hyperparameter optimization of machine learning models for prediction of HIV/AIDS test results. International Journal of Computers and Applications. 2022;44(9):875–886.
  48. Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2010;31(14):2225–2236.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.