Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Compositing with 2D Vector Fields by using Shape Maps that can represent Inconsistent, Impossible, and Incoherent Shapes (2401.02200v1)

Published 4 Jan 2024 in cs.GR

Abstract: In this paper, we present a new compositing approach to obtain stylized reflections and refractions with a simple control. Our approach does not require any mask or separate 3D rendering. Moreover, only one additional image is sufficient to obtain a composited image with convincing qualitative reflection and refraction effects. We have also developed linearized methods that are easy to compute. Although these methods do not directly correspond to the underlying physical phenomena of reflection and refraction, they can provide results that are visually similar to realistic 3D rendering. The main advantage of this approach is the ability to treat images as ``mock-3D'' shapes that can be inserted into any digital paint system without any significant structural change. The core of our approach is the shape map, which encodes 2D shape and thickness information for all visible points of an image of a shape. This information does not have to be complete or consistent to obtain interesting composites. In particular, the shape maps allow us to represent impossible and incoherent shapes with 2D non-conservative vector fields.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Ron Brinkmann. The art and science of digital compositing: Techniques for visual effects, animation and motion graphics. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
  2. Volume rendering. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 22(4):65–74, 1988.
  3. Global illumination for 2d artworks with vector field rendering. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Posters, SIGGRAPH ’14, pages 95:1–95:1, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
  4. Wang Youyou. Qualitative Global Illumination of Mock-3D Scenes. PhD thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2014. Retrieved from http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/157921.
  5. Andrew S Glassner. Cubism and cameras: Free-form optics for computer graphics. Microsoft Research MSR-TR-2000, 5:2, 2000.
  6. Willem de Kooning, 1904-1997: Content as a Glimpse. Taschen, 2004.
  7. David Hockney. David Hockney, volume 1. Manchester University Press, 1995.
  8. Multicam: A system for interactive rendering of abstract digital images. In Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science, pages 265–272, Arizona, 2004. Bridges Conference.
  9. A framework for multiperspective rendering. Rendering Techniques, 4:61–68, 2004.
  10. S. Meadows and E. Akleman. Abstract digital paintings created with painting camera technique. Proc. D’ART 2000 / Information Visualization 2000, 2000a.
  11. Creating abstract digital paintings with painting camera technique. In 2000 IEEE Conference on Multimedia. An International Conference on Computer Visualization and Graphics, pages 250–254, NewYork, NY, 2000b. IEEE.
  12. Remote empathetic viewpoint: A novel approach to extending cubism. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2020 Posters, pages 1–2. ACM SIGGRAPH, 2020.
  13. Cubist style rendering from photographs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 9(4):443–453, 2003.
  14. Perceptual 3d rendering based on principles of analytical cubism. Computers & Graphics, 36(8):991–1004, 2012.
  15. Cubist style rendering for 3d polygonal models. Journal of information science and engineering, 27(6):1885–1899, 2011.
  16. Gershon Elber. Smi 2011: Full paper: Modeling (seemingly) impossible models. Comput. Graph., 35(3):632–638, June 2011.
  17. Recursive camera painting: A method for real-time painterly renderings of 3d scenes, 2023a.
  18. Approximating dynamic global illumination in image space. In Proceedings of the 2009 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games, pages 75–82, 2009.
  19. Surface flows for image-based shading design. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 31(94):94:1–94:9, 2012.
  20. Appearance-preserving simplification. In Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH ’98, pages 115–122, 1998.
  21. Scott F. Johnston. Lumo: illumination for cel animation. In Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on Non-photorealistic animation and rendering, NPAR ’02, pages 45–52, 2002.
  22. Single-view relighting with normal map painting. Proceedings of Pacific Graphics, pages 27–34, 2006.
  23. Crossshade: shading concept sketches using cross-section curves. ACM Trans. Graph., 31(4):45:1–45:11, 2012.
  24. Web-based dynamic paintings: Real-time interactive artworks in web using a 2.5d pipeline, 2023b.
  25. Digital bas-relief from 3d scenes. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers, SIGGRAPH ’07, 2007.
  26. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. In Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH ’02, pages 249–256, 2002.
  27. Representing and modeling inconsistent, impossible, and incoherent shapes and scenes with 2d non-conservative vector fields mapped on 2-complexes, 2024.
  28. Environment matting and compositing. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 205–214, 1999.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.