Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LEAP-VO: Long-term Effective Any Point Tracking for Visual Odometry (2401.01887v2)

Published 3 Jan 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: Visual odometry estimates the motion of a moving camera based on visual input. Existing methods, mostly focusing on two-view point tracking, often ignore the rich temporal context in the image sequence, thereby overlooking the global motion patterns and providing no assessment of the full trajectory reliability. These shortcomings hinder performance in scenarios with occlusion, dynamic objects, and low-texture areas. To address these challenges, we present the Long-term Effective Any Point Tracking (LEAP) module. LEAP innovatively combines visual, inter-track, and temporal cues with mindfully selected anchors for dynamic track estimation. Moreover, LEAP's temporal probabilistic formulation integrates distribution updates into a learnable iterative refinement module to reason about point-wise uncertainty. Based on these traits, we develop LEAP-VO, a robust visual odometry system adept at handling occlusions and dynamic scenes. Our mindful integration showcases a novel practice by employing long-term point tracking as the front-end. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed pipeline significantly outperforms existing baselines across various visual odometry benchmarks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. Dynaslam: Tracking, mapping, and inpainting in dynamic scenes. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(4):4076–4083, 2018.
  2. Context-tap: Tracking any point demands spatial context features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02000, 2023.
  3. Codeslam—learning a compact, optimisable representation for dense visual slam. In CVPR, pages 2560–2568, 2018.
  4. A naturalistic open source movie for optical flow evaluation. In ECCV, pages 611–625. Springer-Verlag, 2012.
  5. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In CVPR, pages 9650–9660, 2021.
  6. Self-supervised learning with geometric constraints in monocular video: Connecting flow, depth, and camera. In ICCV, pages 7063–7072, 2019.
  7. Monoslam: Real-time single camera slam. IEEE TPAMI, 29(6):1052–1067, 2007.
  8. Tap-vid: A benchmark for tracking any point in a video. NeurIPS, 35:13610–13626, 2022.
  9. Tapir: Tracking any point with per-frame initialization and temporal refinement. ICCV, 2023.
  10. Lsd-slam: Large-scale direct monocular slam. In ECCV, pages 834–849. Springer, 2014.
  11. Direct sparse odometry. IEEE TPAMI, 40(3):611–625, 2017.
  12. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981.
  13. Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32(11):1231–1237, 2013.
  14. Particle video revisited: Tracking through occlusions using point trajectories. In ECCV, pages 59–75. Springer, 2022.
  15. Space-time correspondence as a contrastive random walk. NeurIPS, 33:19545–19560, 2020.
  16. Cotracker: It is better to track together. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07635, 2023.
  17. Video object segmentation with language referring expressions. In ACCV, 2018.
  18. Robust consistent video depth estimation. In CVPR, pages 1611–1621, 2021.
  19. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In ICLR, 2018.
  20. David G Lowe. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In ICCV, pages 1150–1157. Ieee, 1999.
  21. Streaming and exploration of dynamically changing dense 3d reconstructions in immersive virtual reality. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct), pages 43–48. IEEE, 2016.
  22. ORB-SLAM2: an open-source SLAM system for monocular, stereo and RGB-D cameras. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33(5):1255–1262, 2017.
  23. Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 31(5):1147–1163, 2015.
  24. Airdos: Dynamic slam benefits from articulated objects. In ICRA, pages 8047–8053. IEEE, 2022.
  25. Competitive collaboration: Joint unsupervised learning of depth, camera motion, optical flow and motion segmentation. In CVPR, pages 12240–12249, 2019.
  26. Structure-from-motion revisited. In CVPR, 2016.
  27. Dytanvo: Joint refinement of visual odometry and motion segmentation in dynamic environments. In ICRA, pages 4048–4055. IEEE, 2023.
  28. The replica dataset: A digital replica of indoor spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05797, 2019.
  29. Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow. In ECCV, pages 402–419. Springer, 2020.
  30. Droid-slam: Deep visual slam for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras. NeurIPS, 34:16558–16569, 2021.
  31. Deep patch visual odometry. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04726, 2022.
  32. Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis. In International workshop on vision algorithms, pages 298–372. Springer, 1999.
  33. Tracking everything everywhere all at once. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05422, 2023.
  34. Stereo dso: Large-scale direct sparse visual odometry with stereo cameras. In ICCV, pages 3903–3911, 2017a.
  35. Deepvo: Towards end-to-end visual odometry with deep recurrent convolutional neural networks. In ICRA, pages 2043–2050. IEEE, 2017b.
  36. Tartanair: A dataset to push the limits of visual slam. In IROS, pages 4909–4916. IEEE, 2020.
  37. Tartanvo: A generalizable learning-based vo. In CoRL, pages 1761–1772. PMLR, 2021.
  38. D3vo: Deep depth, deep pose and deep uncertainty for monocular visual odometry. In CVPR, pages 1281–1292, 2020.
  39. Geonet: Unsupervised learning of dense depth, optical flow and camera pose. In CVPR, pages 1983–1992, 2018.
  40. An overview to visual odometry and visual slam: Applications to mobile robotics. Intelligent Industrial Systems, 1(4):289–311, 2015.
  41. Structure and motion from casual videos. In ECCV, pages 20–37. Springer, 2022.
  42. Particlesfm: Exploiting dense point trajectories for localizing moving cameras in the wild. In ECCV, pages 523–542. Springer, 2022.
  43. In-place scene labelling and understanding with implicit scene representation. In CVPR, pages 15838–15847, 2021.
  44. Unsupervised learning of depth and ego-motion from video. In CVPR, pages 1851–1858, 2017.
Citations (10)

Summary

  • The paper presents LEAP-VO, which integrates anchor-based dynamic point tracking with temporal probabilistic methods for robust visual odometry.
  • The methodology leverages continuous multi-frame tracking to mitigate challenges like occlusions and low-texture regions, enhancing trajectory estimation.
  • Experimental results demonstrate significant accuracy gains in dynamic scenes, outperforming baseline VO systems in both translation and rotation metrics.

Introduction to Visual Odometry

Visual odometry (VO) is a method used to estimate the motion of a camera by analyzing a series of images captured by the camera as it moves through an environment. It is particularly crucial for applications such as robotics, augmented reality (AR), and autonomous vehicles. The performance of VO systems largely depends on their ability to track points in the image sequence and the accuracy with which these points can be associated across multiple frames.

Challenges of Visual Odometry

Traditional VO methods often employ a two-view approach to match features between consecutive image pairs, but this can be limiting because it ignores the rich temporal information in the sequence of images. Moreover, occlusions, dynamic scenes, and areas with little texture can pose significant challenges to existing VO systems, causing a degradation in their performance.

LEAP and Anchor-Based Dynamic Track Estimation

In response to these challenges, a module named Long-term Effective Any Point Tracking (LEAP) was developed. It combines visual, inter-track, and temporal cues along with strategically selected points called anchors, to provide a robust tracking capability across multiple frames. These anchors help in capturing the global motion patterns by being well-distributed and easy to track. LEAP also introduces a temporal probabilistic approach, which allows for iterative refinement and reasoning about point-wise uncertainty, reflecting how confident the system is in the measurements it has taken.

LEAP-VO: A System for Dynamic Environments

LEAP-VO is a system built around the LEAP module. Its purpose is to integrate long-term point tracking into the process of visual odometry, allowing for continuous motion estimation from dynamic scenes. This multidimensional approach makes LEAP-VO particularly efficient in handling complex scenarios, such as those with moving objects and partial occlusions.

Experiments and Results

Extensive tests were carried out to compare LEAP-VO against other state-of-the-art VO systems. These included indoor, static scenes, and outdoor, dynamic environments. The testing took into consideration factors such as absolute trajectory errors and the relative errors in both translation and rotation.

The results revealed that LEAP-VO achieved significant performance improvements over existing baselines, most notably in dynamic scenes—which are traditionally more challenging for VO systems. These findings suggested that LEAP-VO's innovative integration of temporal information and its robust handling of point tracking made it a more effective solution for dynamic situations.

Potential and Conclusion

LEAP-VO has opened up new avenues for more reliable visual odometry, particularly in environments that involve complex motions and require robust occlusion handling. The system could potentially be adapted and integrated with other long-term point tracking methods to further enhance its camera-tracking accuracy and overall robustness, paving the way for advancements across a range of applications that rely on visual odometry.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com