Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Scalable network reconstruction in subquadratic time (2401.01404v5)

Published 2 Jan 2024 in cs.DS, cs.LG, physics.data-an, stat.CO, and stat.ML

Abstract: Network reconstruction consists in determining the unobserved pairwise couplings between $N$ nodes given only observational data on the resulting behavior that is conditioned on those couplings -- typically a time-series or independent samples from a graphical model. A major obstacle to the scalability of algorithms proposed for this problem is a seemingly unavoidable quadratic complexity of $\Omega(N2)$, corresponding to the requirement of each possible pairwise coupling being contemplated at least once, despite the fact that most networks of interest are sparse, with a number of non-zero couplings that is only $O(N)$. Here we present a general algorithm applicable to a broad range of reconstruction problems that significantly outperforms this quadratic baseline. Our algorithm relies on a stochastic second neighbor search (Dong et al., 2011) that produces the best edge candidates with high probability, thus bypassing an exhaustive quadratic search. If we rely on the conjecture that the second-neighbor search finishes in log-linear time (Baron & Darling, 2020; 2022), we demonstrate theoretically that our algorithm finishes in subquadratic time, with a data-dependent complexity loosely upper bounded by $O(N{3/2}\log N)$, but with a more typical log-linear complexity of $O(N\log2N)$. In practice, we show that our algorithm achieves a performance that is many orders of magnitude faster than the quadratic baseline -- in a manner consistent with our theoretical analysis -- allows for easy parallelization, and thus enables the reconstruction of networks with hundreds of thousands and even millions of nodes and edges.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. S. L. Lauritzen, Graphical Models, Vol. 17 (Clarendon Press, 1996).
  2. M. I. Jordan, Graphical Models, Statistical Science 19, 140 (2004).
  3. M. Drton and M. H. Maathuis, Structure Learning in Graphical Modeling, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 4, 365 (2017).
  4. M. Timme and J. Casadiego, Revealing networks from dynamics: An introduction, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47, 343001 (2014).
  5. T. Bury, A statistical physics perspective on criticality in financial markets, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2013, P11004 (2013), arxiv:1310.2446 [physics, q-fin] .
  6. P. D’haeseleer, S. Liang, and R. Somogyi, Genetic network inference: From co-expression clustering to reverse engineering, Bioinformatics 16, 707 (2000).
  7. Braunstein Alfredo, Ingrosso Alessandro, and Muntoni Anna Paola, Network reconstruction from infection cascades, Journal of The Royal Society Interface 16, 20180844 (2019).
  8. A. P. Dempster, Covariance Selection, Biometrics 28, 157 (1972), 2528966 .
  9. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso, Biostatistics 9, 432 (2008).
  10. R. Mazumder and T. Hastie, The graphical lasso: New insights and alternatives, Electronic Journal of Statistics 6, 2125 (2012).
  11. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and M. Wainwright, Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations (CRC Press, 2015).
  12. H. C. Nguyen, R. Zecchina, and J. Berg, Inverse statistical problems: From the inverse Ising problem to data science, Advances in Physics 66, 197 (2017).
  13. G. Bresler, E. Mossel, and A. Sly, Reconstruction of Markov Random Fields from Samples: Some Easy Observations and Algorithms (2010), arxiv:0712.1402 [cs] .
  14. G. Bresler, D. Gamarnik, and D. Shah, Learning Graphical Models From the Glauber Dynamics, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 64, 4072 (2018).
  15. J. D. Baron and R. W. R. Darling, K-Nearest Neighbor Approximation Via the Friend-of-a-Friend Principle (2020), arxiv:1908.07645 [math, stat] .
  16. J. D. Baron and R. W. R. Darling, Empirical complexity of comparator-based nearest neighbor descent (2022), arxiv:2202.00517 [cs, stat] .
  17. S. J. Wright, Coordinate descent algorithms, Mathematical Programming 151, 3 (2015).
  18. J. C. Spall, Cyclic Seesaw Process for Optimization and Identification, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 154, 187 (2012).
  19. P. Abbeel, D. Koller, and A. Y. Ng, Learning Factor Graphs in Polynomial Time and Sample Complexity, Journal of Machine Learning Research 7, 1743 (2006).
  20. M. J. Wainwright, J. Lafferty, and P. Ravikumar, High-Dimensional Graphical Model Selection Using $\ell_1$-Regularized Logistic Regression, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 19 (MIT Press, 2006).
  21. M. Smid, Closest-Point Problems in Computational Geometry, in Handbook of Computational Geometry, edited by J. R. Sack and J. Urrutia (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000) pp. 877–935.
  22. H.-P. Lenhof and M. Smid, The k closest pairs problem, Unpublished manuscript  (1992).
  23. T. P. Peixoto, The graph-tool python library, figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.1164194 (2014), available at https://graph-tool.skewed.de.
  24. T. P. Peixoto, Network Reconstruction and Community Detection from Dynamics, Physical Review Letters 123, 128301 (2019).
  25. W. E. Johnson, C. Li, and A. Rabinovic, Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods, Biostatistics 8, 118 (2007).
  26. J. Besag, Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 36, 192 (1974).
  27. K. Khare, S.-Y. Oh, and B. Rajaratnam, A Convex Pseudolikelihood Framework for High Dimensional Partial Correlation Estimation with Convergence Guarantees, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 77, 803 (2015).
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a scalable algorithm that achieves subquadratic network reconstruction by leveraging a greedy coordinate descent approach tuned for sparse networks.
  • The paper exploits a stochastic search for second neighbors using an approximate k-nearest neighbor search (NNDescent) to significantly reduce computational complexity.
  • The paper demonstrates practical efficiency on large datasets, offering promising applications in fields like microbiomics and genomics.

Overview of the Paper: Scalable Network Reconstruction in Subquadratic Time

The paper "Scalable Network Reconstruction in Subquadratic Time," authored by Tiago P. Peixoto, addresses a fundamental challenge in network science: the reconstruction of unobserved pairwise interactions from empirical data. Conventionally, network reconstruction algorithms endure at least quadratic complexity O(N2)O(N^2) because each pairwise coupling between NN nodes must be evaluated. However, many real-world networks are sparse, containing a much smaller number of non-zero couplings proportional to O(N)O(N). The author proposes an innovative algorithm capable of performing network reconstruction with a complexity that scales subquadratically with the number of nodes, aiming for a practical log-linear average complexity O(Nlog2N)O(N\log^2N).

Contributions and Algorithms

The central contribution of the paper is the development of a general algorithm applicable to various network reconstruction problems. This algorithm exploits a stochastic search technique for second neighbors, which efficiently prioritizes promising edge candidates. The procedure allows for bypassing the exhaustive quadratic search typical in conventional algorithms, enabling the reconstruction of networks of massive size—comprising hundreds of thousands to millions of nodes and edges.

The proposed approach advances beyond the typical coordinate descent (CD) baseline, which iteratively updates each possible pairwise coupling and suffers from at least O(N2)O(N^2) complexity. To achieve subquadratic complexity, the paper introduces a greedy coordinate descent (GCD) algorithm. The GCD leverages a "m-closest pairs" strategy, significantly refining the selection of potential candidates for update through an approximative kk-nearest neighbor (KNN) search. The KNN search is approximated by the NNDescent algorithm, which sorts through a potential neighbor graph to find optimal edge candidates rapidly.

Implication and Practical Assessment

This proposed methodology marks a shift in scaling possibilities for network reconstruction. It implies that even for networks represented by a large number of nodes, the traditionally prohibitive O(N2)O(N^2) scaling can be surpassed, thereby extending network inference feasibility to substantially larger datasets within reasonable computation times. The empirical analyses include a performance evaluation of synthetic test cases and large-scale empirical textual datasets from domains such as microbiomics and genomics.

Future Directions and Theoretical Speculation

Future developments could focus on extending this approach to handle more complex forms of network inference, potentially involving non-convex objectives or intricate dynamics beyond the currently tested Ising models and multivariate Gaussian assumptions. Additionally, while the NNDescent algorithm is empirically robust, its theoretical limits are not fully described. Addressing these theoretical underpinnings could refine the guarantees on convergence and approximate performance, especially under distributional assumptions or sparse graph constraints.

This research opens avenues for much more scalable and efficient network reconstruction algorithms, fundamentally changing how large-scale network data can be analyzed. Further refining the algorithm's robustness and uncovering theoretical guarantees will only enhance its utility across computational network science and related interdisciplinary fields.