Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LLbezpeky: Leveraging Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detection (2401.01269v2)

Published 2 Jan 2024 in cs.CR, cs.AI, and cs.SE
LLbezpeky: Leveraging Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detection

Abstract: Despite the continued research and progress in building secure systems, Android applications continue to be ridden with vulnerabilities, necessitating effective detection methods. Current strategies involving static and dynamic analysis tools come with limitations like overwhelming number of false positives and limited scope of analysis which make either difficult to adopt. Over the past years, machine learning based approaches have been extensively explored for vulnerability detection, but its real-world applicability is constrained by data requirements and feature engineering challenges. LLMs, with their vast parameters, have shown tremendous potential in understanding semnatics in human as well as programming languages. We dive into the efficacy of LLMs for detecting vulnerabilities in the context of Android security. We focus on building an AI-driven workflow to assist developers in identifying and rectifying vulnerabilities. Our experiments show that LLMs outperform our expectations in finding issues within applications correctly flagging insecure apps in 91.67% of cases in the Ghera benchmark. We use inferences from our experiments towards building a robust and actionable vulnerability detection system and demonstrate its effectiveness. Our experiments also shed light on how different various simple configurations can affect the True Positive (TP) and False Positive (FP) rates.

Leveraging LLMs for Android Vulnerability Detection

Introduction

The landscape of Android application security remains fraught with challenges, necessitating the exploration of new and effective vulnerability detection methodologies. Traditional static and dynamic analysis tools, while useful, often suffer from limitations such as a high volume of false positives and a restricted scope of analysis, making their adaptation cumbersome. Recent advancements in machine learning have opened new avenues for vulnerability detection; however, these approaches are limited by extensive data requirements and complex feature engineering. Amidst these developments, LLMs have emerged as potentially transformative tools due to their sophisticated understanding of both human and programming languages. This paper explores the practicality of utilizing LLMs, specifically in the field of Android security, aiming to construct an AI-driven workflow to aid developers in identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities.

Prompt Engineering and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

At the crux of leveraging LLMs for vulnerability detection are two key techniques: Prompt Engineering and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Prompt Engineering involves crafting intricate prompts that optimize LLM performance for specific tasks, with innovative strategies like Chain-of-Thought Prompting showing notable promise. RAG, on the other hand, empowers LLMs to augment their responses with information retrieved from an external knowledge base. These methodologies promise a nuanced approach to vulnerability detection by providing LLMs with the context necessary for accurate analysis.

Methodology and Experiments

The paper employs GPT-4 for its experiments, utilizing the Ghera benchmark as the primary dataset. The methodology is articulated through a series of experiments aimed at understanding the LLM's ability to detect Android vulnerabilities with various levels of context. For instance, Experiment 1 explores the LLM's inherent detection capability with minimal prompting, while subsequent experiments enrich the LLM's context through summaries of vulnerabilities and enabling file-specific requests. These experiments reveal that LLMs, particularly GPT-4, exhibit a strong potential for accurately identifying vulnerabilities, provided they are given sufficient context.

Results and LLB Analyzer Development

The experiments underscore the significant promise of LLMs in detecting vulnerabilities, with the capability to correctly flag insecure apps in a substantial fraction of cases. Building on these insights, the paper introduces the LLB Analyzer, a Python package designed to automate Android application scanning for vulnerabilities. This tool integrates the learnings from the experiments, offering a flexible and user-friendly interface for application security analysis.

Case Studies and Discussion

The paper further validates the efficacy of the LLB Analyzer through case studies, including an analysis of the Vuldroid application. These real-world applications underscore the practical utility of the tool, successfully identifying a majority of seeded vulnerabilities. Moreover, the discussion section reflects on the broader implications of the paper, highlighting the potential for integrating LLMs with traditional analyses to enhance vulnerability detection capabilities.

Conclusion

This paper represents a significant stride towards harnessing the capabilities of LLMs for the enhancement of Android application security. Through a series of methodical experiments and the development of the LLB Analyzer, it demonstrates the practical applicability of LLMs in identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities. The research not only offers a novel approach to vulnerability detection but also sets the stage for future explorations in integrating AI-driven methodologies with software engineering practices to bolster system security.

Acknowledgments

The paper concludes with acknowledgments to the support and guidance provided by the academic and administrative staff at the University of Waterloo, emphasizing the collaborative effort that underpinned the research.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. Too quiet in the library: An empirical study of security updates in android apps’ native code. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 1347–1359.
  2. Owura Asare. 2023. Security Evaluations of GitHub’s Copilot. Master’s thesis. University of Waterloo.
  3. An android application vulnerability mining method based on static and dynamic analysis. In 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC). IEEE, 599–603.
  4. Evaluation of ChatGPT Model for Vulnerability Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07232 (2023).
  5. Understanding the evolution of android app vulnerabilities. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 70, 1 (2019), 212–230.
  6. Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10620 (2023).
  7. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 9459–9474.
  8. Christopher D Manning. 2022. Human language understanding & reasoning. Daedalus 151, 2 (2022), 127–138.
  9. David Noever. 2023. Can Large Language Models Find And Fix Vulnerable Software? arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10345 (2023).
  10. Android source code vulnerability detection: a systematic literature review. Comput. Surveys 55, 9 (2023), 1–37.
  11. DefectHunter: A Novel LLM-Driven Boosted-Conformer-based Code Vulnerability Detection Mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15324 (2023).
  12. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 24824–24837.
  13. A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382 (2023).
  14. Prompt-Enhanced Software Vulnerability Detection Using ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12697 (2023).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Noble Saji Mathews (13 papers)
  2. Yelizaveta Brus (1 paper)
  3. Yousra Aafer (3 papers)
  4. Shane McIntosh (14 papers)
  5. Meiyappan Nagappan (25 papers)
Citations (11)