Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
149 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Identification of Additive Continuous-time Systems in Open and Closed loop (2401.01263v2)

Published 2 Jan 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: When identifying electrical, mechanical, or biological systems, parametric continuous-time identification methods can lead to interpretable and parsimonious models when the model structure aligns with the physical properties of the system. Traditional linear system identification may not consider the most parsimonious model when relying solely on unfactored transfer functions, which typically result from standard direct approaches. This paper presents a novel identification method that delivers additive models for both open and closed-loop setups. The estimators that are derived are shown to be generically consistent, and can admit the identification of marginally stable additive systems. Numerical simulations show the efficacy of the proposed approach, and its performance in identifying a modal representation of a flexible beam is verified using experimental data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. K. J. Åström. Maximum likelihood and prediction error methods. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 12(8):551–574, 1979.
  2. Zeros of sampled systems. Automatica, 20(1):31–38, 1984.
  3. E.-W. Bai. Identification of nonlinear additive FIR systems. Automatica, 41(7):1247–1253, 2005.
  4. Identification of an additive nonlinear system and its applications in generalized Hammerstein models. Automatica, 44(2):430–436, 2008.
  5. Optimal estimation of rational feedforward control via instrumental variables: With application to a wafer stage. Asian Journal of Control, 20(3):975–992, 2018.
  6. Fault detection for precision mechatronics: Online estimation of mechanical resonances. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(37):746–751, 2022.
  7. Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
  8. U. Forssell and L. Ljung. Closed-loop identification revisited. Automatica, 35(7):1215–1241, 1999.
  9. U. Forssell and L. Ljung. Identification of unstable systems using output error and Box-Jenkins model structures. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45(1):137–141, 2000.
  10. Direct continuous-time model identification of high-powered light-emitting diodes from rapidly sampled thermal step response data. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 47(3):6430–6435, 2014.
  11. Continuous-time model identification from sampled data: implementation issues and performance evaluation. International Journal of Control, 76(13):1337–1357, 2003.
  12. H. Garnier and L. Wang (Eds.). Identification of Continuous-time Models from Sampled Data. Springer, 2008.
  13. H. Garnier and P. C. Young. The advantages of directly identifying continuous-time transfer function models in practical applications. International Journal of Control, 87(7):1319–1338, 2014.
  14. W. K. Gawronski. Advanced Structural Dynamics and Active Control of Structures. Springer, 2004.
  15. M. Gilson and H. Garnier. Continuous-time model identification of systems operating in closed-loop. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 36(16):405–410, 2003.
  16. Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop continuous-time model identification. In H. Garnier and L. Wang (Eds.). Identification of Continuous-Time Models from Sampled Data, pages 133–160. Springer, 2008.
  17. Optimal instrumental variable method for closed-loop identification. IET Control Theory & Applications, 5(10):1147–1154, 2011.
  18. Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop system identification. Automatica, 41(2):241–249, 2005.
  19. A frequency localizing basis function-based IV method for wideband system identification. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 26(1):329–335, 2017.
  20. Consistency analysis of refined instrumental variable methods for continuous-time system identification in closed-loop. Provisionally Accepted in Automatica, 2022.
  21. Refined instrumental variable methods for unstable continuous-time systems in closed-loop. International Journal of Control, pages 1–15, 2022.
  22. On the relation between discrete and continuous-time refined instrumental variable methods. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 7:2233–2238, 2023.
  23. Parsimonious identification of continuous-time systems: A block-coordinate descent approach. In 22nd IFAC World Congress, Yokohama, Japan, 2023.
  24. An asymptotically optimal indirect approach to continuous-time system identification. In 57th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 638–643, 2018.
  25. Bootstrap inference in semiparametric generalized additive models. Econometric Theory, 20(2):265–300, 2004.
  26. T. Hastie and R. Tibshirani. Generalized additive models. Statistical Science, 1(3):297 – 310, 1986.
  27. L. Ljung. System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall, 1999.
  28. L. Ljung. Experiments with identification of continuous time models. In 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint Malo, France, pages 1175–1180. Elsevier, 2009.
  29. D. K. Miu. Physical interpretation of transfer function zeros for simple control systems with mechanical flexibilities. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 113:419, 1991.
  30. On-line instrumental variable-based feedforward tuning for non-resetting motion tasks. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, pages 1–19, 2023.
  31. T. Oomen. Advanced motion control for precision mechatronics: Control, identification, and learning of complex systems. IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications, 7(2):127–140, 2018.
  32. J. D. Opsomer and D. Ruppert. A root-n consistent backfitting estimator for semiparametric additive modeling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8(4):715–732, 1999.
  33. Consistency analysis of the simplified refined instrumental variable method for continuous-time systems. Automatica, 113, Article 108767, 2020.
  34. Efficiency analysis of the simplified refined instrumental variable method for continuous-time systems. Automatica, 121, Article 109196, 2020.
  35. Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control. In 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 260–265. IEEE, 2011.
  36. A. Preumont. Vibration Control of Active Structures: An Introduction, 3rd Edition. Springer, 2018.
  37. G. P. Rao and H. Unbehauen. Identification of continuous-time systems. IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications, 153(2):185–220, 2006.
  38. E. Reynders. System identification methods for (operational) modal analysis: review and comparison. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 19:51–124, 2012.
  39. D. Saha and G. P. Rao. A general algorithm for parameter identification in lumped continuous systems–the Poisson moment functional approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27(1):223–225, 1982.
  40. T. Söderström. Ergodicity results for sample covariances. Problems of Control and Information Theory, 4(2):131–138, 1975.
  41. T Söderström and P Stoica. Instrumental Variable Methods for System Identification. Springer, 1983.
  42. T. Söderström and P. Stoica. System Identification. Prentice-Hall, 1989.
  43. Instrumental variable methods for closed loop systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 20(5):363–368, 1987.
  44. P. Stoica and T. Söderström. Optimal instrumental variable estimation and approximate implementations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 28(7):757–772, 1983.
  45. P. M. J. Van den Hof. Closed-loop issues in system identification. Annual Reviews in Control, 22:173–186, 1998.
  46. Identifying position-dependent mechanical systems: A modal approach applied to a flexible wafer stage. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 29(1):194–206, 2020.
  47. P. C. Young. The determination of the parameters of a dynamic process. IERE Journal of Radio and Electronic Engineering, 29:345–361, 1965.
  48. P. C. Young. Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis: An Introduction for the Student and Practitioner, 2nd Edition. Springer, 2012.
  49. Simple refined IV methods of closed-loop system identification. In 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint Malo, France, pages 1151–1156, 2009.
  50. Refined instrumental variable methods of recursive time-series analysis. Part III, Extensions. International Journal of Control, 31(4):741–764, 1980.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now