Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Monogamy and tradeoff relations for wave-particle duality information (2401.01235v1)

Published 2 Jan 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: The notions of predictability and visibility are essential in the mathematical formulation of wave particle duality. The work of Jakob and Bergou [Phys. Rev. A 76, 052107] generalises these notions for higher-dimensional quantum systems, which were initially defined for qubits, and subsequently proves a complementarity relation between predictability and visibility. By defining the single-party information content of a quantum system as the addition of predictability and visibility, and assuming that entanglement in a bipartite system in the form of concurrence mutually excludes the single-party information, the authors have proposed a complementarity relation between the concurrence and the single-party information content. We show that the information content of a quantum system defined by Jakob and Bergou is nothing but the Hilbert-Schmidt distance between the state of the quantum system of our consideration and the maximally mixed state. Motivated by the fact that the trace distance is a good measure of distance as compared to the Hilbert-Schmidt distance from the information theoretic point of view, we, in this work, define the information content of a quantum system as the trace distance between the quantum state and the maximally mixed state. We then employ the quantum Pinsker's inequality and the reverse Pinsker's inequality to derive a new complementarity and a reverse complementarity relation between the single-party information content and the entanglement present in a bipartite quantum system in a pure state. As a consequence of our findings, we show that for a bipartite system in a pure state, its entanglement and the predictabilities and visibilities associated with the subsystems cannot be arbitrarily small as well as arbitrarily large.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (92)
  1. N. Bohr. The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory1. Nature, 121(3050):580–590, Apr 1928.
  2. Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseparability and a quantitative statement of bohr’s principle. Phys. Rev. D, 19:473–484, Jan 1979.
  3. Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer. Physics Letters A, 128(8):391–394, 1988.
  4. Fringe visibility and which-way information in an atom interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:5705–5709, Dec 1998.
  5. An interferometric complementarity experiment in a bulk nuclear magnetic resonance ensemble. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(10):2555, feb 2003.
  6. Quantification of complementarity in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A, 72:052109, Nov 2005.
  7. Quantitative wave-particle duality and nonerasing quantum erasure. Phys. Rev. A, 60:4285–4290, Dec 1999.
  8. Delayed-choice test of quantum complementarity with interfering single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:220402, Jun 2008.
  9. T. L. Dimitrova and A. Weis. The wave-particle duality of light: A demonstration experiment. American Journal of Physics, 76(2):137–142, 02 2008.
  10. Complementarity of one-particle and two-particle interference. Phys. Rev. A, 48:1023–1027, Aug 1993.
  11. Two interferometric complementarities. Phys. Rev. A, 51:54–67, Jan 1995.
  12. Berthold-Georg Englert. Fringe visibility and which-way information: An inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77:2154–2157, Sep 1996.
  13. Quantitative complementarity relations in bipartite systems. arXiv e-prints, pages quant–ph/0302075, February 2003.
  14. Tracey E. Tessier. Complementarity relations for multi-qubit systems. Foundations of Physics Letters, 18(2):107–121, Apr 2005.
  15. Complementarity of entanglement and interference. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 17(04):493–509, 2006.
  16. Complementarity and information in “delayed-choice for entanglement swapping”. Foundations of Physics, 35(11):1909–1919, Nov 2005.
  17. Local versus nonlocal information in quantum-information theory: Formalism and phenomena. Phys. Rev. A, 71:062307, Jun 2005.
  18. Stephan Dürr. Quantitative wave-particle duality in multibeam interferometers. Phys. Rev. A, 64:042113, Sep 2001.
  19. G. Bimonte and R. Musto. Comment on “quantitative wave-particle duality in multibeam interferometers”. Phys. Rev. A, 67:066101, Jun 2003.
  20. G Bimonte and R Musto. On interferometric duality in multibeam experiments. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(45):11481, oct 2003.
  21. Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. A, 64:042315, Sep 2001.
  22. Alfredo Luis. Complementarity in multiple beam interference. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(41):8597, oct 2001.
  23. Tabish Qureshi. Interference visibility and wave-particle duality in multipath interference. Phys. Rev. A, 100:042105, Oct 2019.
  24. Wave–particle duality in n-path interference. Annals of Physics, 385:598–604, 2017.
  25. Duality of quantum coherence and path distinguishability. Phys. Rev. A, 92:012118, Jul 2015.
  26. Tabish Qureshi. Coherence, interference and visibility. Quanta, 8(1):24–35, 2019.
  27. Tabish Qureshi. Predictability, distinguishability, and entanglement. Opt. Lett., 46(3):492–495, Feb 2021.
  28. Path predictability and quantum coherence in multi-slit interference. Physica Scripta, 94(9):095004, jul 2019.
  29. Multipath wave-particle duality with a path detector in a quantum superposition. Phys. Rev. A, 103:022219, Feb 2021.
  30. Carl W. Helstrom. Quantum detection and estimation theory. Journal of Statistical Physics, 1(2):231–252, Jun 1969.
  31. Christopher A. Fuchs. Distinguishability and Accessible Information in Quantum Theory. arXiv e-prints, pages quant–ph/9601020, January 1996.
  32. Anthony Chefles. Quantum state discrimination. Contemporary Physics, 41(6):401–424, 2000.
  33. János A Bergou. Quantum state discrimination and selected applications. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 84(1):012001, oct 2007.
  34. Distinguishing between nonorthogonal quantum states of a single nuclear spin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:180501, Nov 2012.
  35. Discriminating single-photon states unambiguously in high dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:020501, Jul 2014.
  36. Quantum state discrimination and its applications. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 48(8):083001, jan 2015.
  37. Probabilistic cloning and identification of linearly independent quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:4999–5002, Jun 1998.
  38. Anthony Chefles. Unambiguous discrimination between linearly dependent states with multiple copies. Phys. Rev. A, 64:062305, Nov 2001.
  39. Anthony Chefles. Condition for unambiguous state discrimination using local operations and classical communication. Phys. Rev. A, 69:050307, May 2004.
  40. Probabilistic superdense coding. Phys. Rev. A, 72:012329, Jul 2005.
  41. Complementarity and entanglement in bipartite qudit systems. Phys. Rev. A, 76:052107, Nov 2007.
  42. F. Bloch. Nuclear induction. Phys. Rev., 70:460–474, Oct 1946.
  43. n𝑛nitalic_n-level coherence vector and higher conservation laws in quantum optics and quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 47:838–841, Sep 1981.
  44. J. Pöttinger and K. Lendi. Generalized bloch equations for decaying systems. Phys. Rev. A, 31:1299–1309, Mar 1985.
  45. K. Lendi. Entropy production in coherence-vector formulation for n-level systems. Phys. Rev. A, 34:662–663, Jul 1986.
  46. R. Alicki and K. Lendi. Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
  47. G. Mahler and V. Weberruß. Quantum Networks: Dynamics of Open Nanostructures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995.
  48. Gen Kimura. The bloch vector for n-level systems. Physics Letters A, 314(5):339–349, 2003.
  49. Characterization of the positivity of the density matrix in terms of the coherence vector representation. Phys. Rev. A, 68:062322, Dec 2003.
  50. Operationally invariant information in quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83:3354–3357, Oct 1999.
  51. Conceptual inadequacy of the shannon information in quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. A, 63:022113, Jan 2001.
  52. Young’s experiment and the finiteness of information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360(1794):1061–1069, 2002.
  53. Information and Fundamental Elements of the Structure of Quantum Theory, pages 323–354. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003.
  54. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature, 390(6660):575–579, Dec 1997.
  55. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:1895–1899, Mar 1993.
  56. Broadcasting of quantum correlations: Possibilities and impossibilities. Phys. Rev. A, 93:042309, Apr 2016.
  57. Asymmetric broadcasting of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. A, 99:022315, Feb 2019.
  58. Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead. Science, 362(6412), October 2018.
  59. Complex networks from classical to quantum. Communications Physics, 2:1–10, 2017.
  60. Quantum random networks. Nature Physics, 6(7):539–543, Jul 2010.
  61. Teleportation, bell’s inequalities and inseparability. Physics Letters A, 222(1):21–25, 1996.
  62. I. Chakrabarty. Teleportation via a mixture of a two qubit subsystem of a n-qubit w and ghz state. The European Physical Journal D, 57(2):265–269, Apr 2010.
  63. Quantum cloning, bell’s inequality and teleportation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(41):415302, sep 2008.
  64. Entanglement witness operator for quantum teleportation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:270501, Dec 2011.
  65. Probabilistic quantum teleportation. Physics Letters A, 305(1):12–17, 2002.
  66. Teleportation of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. A, 108:042620, Oct 2023.
  67. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev., 47:777–780, May 1935.
  68. J. S. Bell. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2 edition, 2004.
  69. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys., 86:419, Apr 2014.
  70. R. F. Werner. Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A, 40:4277, Oct 1989.
  71. Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 28:938, Apr 1972.
  72. Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett., 47:460, Aug 1981.
  73. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:91, Jul 1982.
  74. Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:1804, Dec 1982.
  75. Entanglement and superposition are equivalent concepts in any physical theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128:160402, Apr 2022.
  76. J.C. Principe. Information Theoretic Learning: Renyi’s Entropy and Kernel Perspectives. Information Science and Statistics. Springer New York, 2010.
  77. Linear entropy of multiqutrit nonorthogonal states. Opt. Express, 27(6):8291–8307, Mar 2019.
  78. Laura E. C. Rosales-Zárate and P. D. Drummond. Linear entropy in quantum phase space. Phys. Rev. A, 84:042114, Oct 2011.
  79. Linear entropy as an entanglement measure in two-fermion systems. Phys. Rev. A, 75:032301, Mar 2007.
  80. Entanglement dynamics of electron-electron scattering in low-dimensional semiconductor systems. Phys. Rev. A, 73:052312, May 2006.
  81. Operational classification and quantification of multipartite entangled states. Phys. Rev. A, 74:022314, Aug 2006.
  82. Mott-anderson metal-insulator transitions from entanglement. Phys. Rev. B, 104:134201, Oct 2021.
  83. G. Manfredi and M. R. Feix. Entropy and wigner functions. Phys. Rev. E, 62:4665–4674, Oct 2000.
  84. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  85. One-shot decoupling. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 328(1):251–284, May 2014.
  86. Masanao Ozawa. Entanglement measures and the hilbert–schmidt distance. Physics Letters A, 268(3):158–160, 2000.
  87. Strong bound between trace distance and hilbert-schmidt distance for low-rank states. Phys. Rev. A, 100:022103, Aug 2019.
  88. Hisaharu Umegaki. Conditional expectation in an operator algebra. IV. Entropy and information. Kodai Mathematical Seminar Reports, 14(2):59 – 85, 1962.
  89. John Watrous. The Theory of Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  90. Remainder terms for some quantum entropy inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 55(4):042201, 04 2014.
  91. Refinements of pinsker’s inequality. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49(6):1491–1498, 2003.
  92. Anna Vershynina. Quasi-relative entropy: the closest separable state and reversed pinsker inequality, 2021.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com