Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the Uniqueness of Bayesian Coarse Correlated Equilibria in Standard First-Price and All-Pay Auctions (2401.01185v4)

Published 2 Jan 2024 in cs.GT

Abstract: We study the Bayesian coarse correlated equilibrium (BCCE) of continuous and discretised first-price and all-pay auctions under the standard symmetric independent private-values model. Our study is motivated by the question of how the canonical Bayes-Nash equilibrium (BNE) of the auction relates to the outcomes learned by buyers utilising no-regret algorithms. Numerical experiments show that in two buyer first-price auctions the Wasserstein-$2$ distance of buyers' marginal bid distributions decline as $O(1/n)$ in the discretisation size in instances where the prior distribution is concave, whereas all-pay auctions exhibit similar behaviour without prior dependence. To explain this convergence to a near-equilibrium, we study uniqueness of the BCCE of the continuous auction. Our uniqueness results translate to provable convergence of deterministic self-play to a near equilibrium outcome in these auctions. In the all-pay auction, we show that independent of the prior distribution there is a unique BCCE with symmetric, differentiable, and increasing bidding strategies, which is equivalent to the unique strict BNE. In the first-price auction, we need stronger conditions. Either the prior is strictly concave or the learning algorithm has to be restricted to strictly increasing strategies. Without such strong assumptions, no-regret algorithms can end up in low-price pooling strategies. This is important because it proves that in repeated first-price auctions such as in display ad actions, algorithmic collusion cannot be ruled out without further assumptions even if all bidders rely on no-regret algorithms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Approximating the cut-norm via Grothendieck’s inequality. In Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 72–80, 2004.
  2. E.J. Anderson and P. Nash. Linear Programming in Infinite-dimensional Spaces: Theory and Applications. A Wiley-Interscience publication. Wiley, 1987.
  3. Bayes correlated equilibrium and the comparison of information structures in games. Theoretical Economics, 11(2):487–522, 2016.
  4. Learning equilibria in symmetric auction games using artificial neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3:687–695, 2021.
  5. Computing Bayes-Nash equilibrium in auction games via gradient dynamics. Operations Research, to appear, 2023.
  6. Simultaneous Bayesian auctions and computational complexity. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC ’14, page 895–910, New York, NY, USA, 2014. Association for Computing Machinery.
  7. Auctions with unique equilibria. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC ’13, page 181–196, New York, NY, USA, 2013. Association for Computing Machinery.
  8. Xi Chen and Xiaotie Deng. Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS ’06, page 261–272, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
  9. Xi Chen and Binghui Peng. Complexity of equilibria in first-price auctions under general tie-breaking rules. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16388, 2023.
  10. Stephen A. Clark. An infinite-dimensional LP duality theorem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 28(2):233–245, 2003.
  11. New complexity results about Nash equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior, 63(2):621–641, 2008. Second World Congress of the Game Theory Society.
  12. The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. SIAM Journal on Computing, 39(1):195–259, 2009.
  13. Nash convergence of mean-based learning algorithms in first price auctions. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, pages 141–150, 2022.
  14. Correlated and coarse equilibria of single-item auctions. In Yang Cai and Adrian Vetta, editors, Web and Internet Economics, pages 131–144, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2016. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  15. Convergence analysis of no-regret bidding algorithms in repeated auctions. volume 35, pages 5399–5406, 2021.
  16. On the complexity of equilibrium computation in first-price auctions. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC ’21, page 454–476, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.
  17. Françoise Forges. Correlated equilibrium in games with incomplete information. Revue économique, 74(4):529–539, 2023.
  18. The theory of learning in games, volume 2. MIT press, 1998.
  19. Kaito Fujii. Bayes correlated equilibria and no-regret dynamics, 2023.
  20. Duality overlap in infinite linear programs. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 41(2):333–335, 1973.
  21. John C. Harsanyi and Reinhard Selten, editors. A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT Press, 1st edition, 1988.
  22. Uncoupled dynamics do not lead to Nash equilibrium. American Economic Review, 93(5):1830–1836, 2003.
  23. No-regret learning in Bayesian games. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2, NIPS’15, page 3061–3069, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. MIT Press.
  24. Hans G. Kellerer. Measure theoretic versions of linear programming. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 198(3):367–400, 1988.
  25. Vijay Krishna, editor. Auction Theory. Academic Press, San Diego, 2nd edition, 2010.
  26. Bidder collusion at first-price auctions. Review of Economic Design, 15(3):177–211, 2011.
  27. The Slater conundrum: duality and pricing in infinite-dimensional optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 26(1):111–138, 2016.
  28. Learning in games with continuous action sets and unknown payoff functions. Math. Program., 173(1–2):465–507, jan 2019.
  29. The importance of being discrete: on the inaccuracy of continuous approximations in auction theory, 2020.
  30. Alexander Shapiro. On duality theory of conic linear problems. Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications, 57:135–155, 2001.
  31. Lin Xiao. Dual averaging methods for regularized stochastic learning and online optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(88):2543–2596, 2010.
  32. H. Peyton Young. Strategic learning and its limits. Oxford University Press, 2004.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.