Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 98 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 34 tok/s
GPT-5 High 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 459 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 190 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Train-Free Segmentation in MRI with Cubical Persistent Homology (2401.01160v1)

Published 2 Jan 2024 in eess.IV, cs.CG, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: We describe a new general method for segmentation in MRI scans using Topological Data Analysis (TDA), offering several advantages over traditional machine learning approaches. It works in three steps, first identifying the whole object to segment via automatic thresholding, then detecting a distinctive subset whose topology is known in advance, and finally deducing the various components of the segmentation. Although convoking classical ideas of TDA, such an algorithm has never been proposed separately from deep learning methods. To achieve this, our approach takes into account, in addition to the homology of the image, the localization of representative cycles, a piece of information that seems never to have been exploited in this context. In particular, it offers the ability to perform segmentation without the need for large annotated data sets. TDA also provides a more interpretable and stable framework for segmentation by explicitly mapping topological features to segmentation components. By adapting the geometric object to be detected, the algorithm can be adjusted to a wide range of data segmentation challenges. We carefully study the examples of glioblastoma segmentation in brain MRI, where a sphere is to be detected, as well as myocardium in cardiac MRI, involving a cylinder, and cortical plate detection in fetal brain MRI, whose 2D slices are circles. We compare our method to state-of-the-art algorithms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (91)
  1. Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02629, 2018.
  2. 2014 esc guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal), 72(11):1054–1126, 2014.
  3. A review on automatic fetal and neonatal brain mri segmentation. NeuroImage, 170:231–248, 2018.
  4. Glioma segmentation with cascaded UNet. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 189–198. Springer, 2018.
  5. Deep learning techniques for automatic mri cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 37(11):2514–2525, 2018.
  6. An automatic multi-tissue human fetal brain segmentation benchmark using the fetal tissue annotation dataset. Scientific data, 8(1):167, 2021.
  7. A persistent homology-based topological loss function for multi-class cnn segmentation of cardiac mri. In International Workshop on Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart, pages 3–13. Springer, 2021.
  8. Cardiac segmentation with strong anatomical guarantees. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 39(11):3703–3713, 2020.
  9. Topology-preserving deep image segmentation. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  10. Segmentation of the cortical plate in fetal brain mri with a topological loss. In Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Perinatal Imaging, Placental and Preterm Image Analysis: 3rd International Workshop, UNSURE 2021, and 6th International Workshop, PIPPI 2021, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2021, Strasbourg, France, October 1, 2021, Proceedings 3, pages 200–209. Springer, 2021.
  11. Development of prediction models for one-year brain tumour survival using machine learning: a comparison of accuracy and interpretability. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 233:107482, 2023.
  12. Ujjwal Baid and et al. The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. arXiv:2107.02314, 2021.
  13. Bjoern H. Menze and et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 34(10):1993–2024, 2015.
  14. Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Scientific Data, 4(1), 2017.
  15. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (staple): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 23(7):903–921, 2004.
  16. nnu-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods, 18(2):203–211, 2021.
  17. Ensembles of densely-connected cnns with label-uncertainty for brain tumor segmentation. In Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries: 4th International Workshop, BrainLes 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 16, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part II 4, pages 456–465. Springer, 2019.
  18. Efficient multi-scale 3d cnn with fully connected crf for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Medical image analysis, 36:61–78, 2017.
  19. Clinicopathological analysis of t2-flair mismatch sign in lower-grade gliomas. Scientific reports, 10(1):1–6, 2020.
  20. Quantification of left ventricular indices from ssfp cine imaging: impact of real-world variability in analysis methodology and utility of geometric modeling. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 37(5):1213–1222, 2013.
  21. A normative spatiotemporal mri atlas of the fetal brain for automatic segmentation and analysis of early brain growth. Scientific reports, 7(1):476, 2017.
  22. Atlas-based segmentation of brain tumor images using a markov random field-based tumor growth model and non-rigid registration. In 2010 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology, pages 4080–4083. IEEE, 2010.
  23. Decision forests for tissue-specific segmentation of high-grade gliomas in multi-channel mr. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2012: 15th International Conference, Nice, France, October 1-5, 2012, Proceedings, Part III 15, pages 369–376. Springer, 2012.
  24. Brain tumor detection and segmentation in a crf (conditional random fields) framework with pixel-pairwise affinity and superpixel-level features. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 9:241–253, 2014.
  25. Detection and classification of brain tumor based on multilevel segmentation with convolutional neural network. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 13(4):45–53, 2020.
  26. 3d brain glioma segmentation in mri through integrating multiple densely connected 2d convolutional neural networks. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 22(6):462–475, 2021.
  27. Canet: Context aware network for brain glioma segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 40(7):1763–1777, 2021.
  28. Extending nn-unet for brain tumor segmentation. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 173–186. Springer, 2022.
  29. Yading Yuan. Evaluating scale attention network for automatic brain tumor segmentation with large multi-parametric mri database. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 42–53. Springer, 2022.
  30. Optimized u-net for brain tumor segmentation. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 15–29. Springer, 2022.
  31. Redundancy reduction in semantic segmentation of 3d brain tumor mris. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00742, 2021.
  32. Nnunet with region-based training and loss ensembles for brain tumor segmentation. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 421–430. Springer, 2022.
  33. Coupling nnu-nets with expert knowledge for accurate brain tumor segmentation from mri. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 197–209. Springer, 2022.
  34. Ensemble outperforms single models in brain tumor segmentation. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 451–462. Springer, 2022.
  35. Hnf-netv2 for brain tumor segmentation using multi-modal mr imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.05268, 2022.
  36. Automatic cardiac disease assessment on cine-mri via time-series segmentation and domain specific features. In Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges: 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Quebec City, Canada, September 10-14, 2017, Revised Selected Papers 8, pages 120–129. Springer, 2018.
  37. Fetal brain tissue annotation and segmentation challenge results. Medical Image Analysis, 88:102833, 2023.
  38. A deep attentive convolutional neural network for automatic cortical plate segmentation in fetal mri. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 40(4):1123–1133, 2020.
  39. Steve Y Oudot. Persistence theory: from quiver representations to data analysis. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 209:218, 2015.
  40. Topological data analysis in biomedicine: A review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 130:104082, 2022.
  41. Topological data analysis in medical imaging: current state of the art. Insights into Imaging, 14(1):1–10, 2023.
  42. Gunnar Carlsson. Topology and data. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 46(2):255–308, 2009.
  43. An introduction to Topological Data Analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientists. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 2021.
  44. Explicit topological priors for deep-learning based image segmentation using persistent homology. In International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pages 16–28. Springer, 2019.
  45. A topological loss function for deep-learning based image segmentation using persistent homology. IEEE TPAMI, 2020.
  46. A topological loss function for deep-learning based image segmentation using persistent homology. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020.
  47. Multi-dimensional topological loss for cortical plate segmentation in fetal brain mri. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07566, 2022.
  48. Topology-aware focal loss for 3d image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 580–589, 2023.
  49. Topology preserving compositionality for robust medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 543–552, 2023.
  50. Topology-sensitive weighting model for myocardial segmentation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 165:107286, 2023.
  51. Fetal cortex segmentation with topology and thickness loss constraints. In Workshop on the Ethical and Philosophical Issues in Medical Imaging, pages 123–133. Springer, 2022.
  52. Persistent homology for fast tumor segmentation in whole slide histology images. Procedia Computer Science, 90:119–124, 2016.
  53. Fast and accurate tumor segmentation of histology images using persistent homology and deep convolutional features. Medical image analysis, 55:1–14, 2019.
  54. 3d region segmentation using topological persistence. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 1079–1084. IEEE, 2016.
  55. Persistent homology for object segmentation in multidimensional grayscale images. Pattern Recognition Letters, 112:277–284, 2018.
  56. Persistence-based segmentation of deformable shapes. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition-Workshops, pages 45–52. IEEE, 2010.
  57. Persistence-based clustering in riemannian manifolds. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 60(6):1–38, 2013.
  58. Fast glioblastoma detection in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (flair) images by topological explainable automatic machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.08167, 2019.
  59. Towards personalized diagnosis of glioblastoma in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (flair) by topological interpretable machine learning. Mathematics, 8(5):770, 2020.
  60. Predicting clinical outcomes in glioblastoma: an application of topological and functional data analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531):1139–1150, 2020.
  61. Topological detection of alzheimer’s disease using betti curves. In Interpretability of Machine Intelligence in Medical Image Computing, and Topological Data Analysis and Its Applications for Medical Data, pages 119–128. Springer, 2021.
  62. Hepatic tumor classification using texture and topology analysis of non-contrast-enhanced three-dimensional t1-weighted mr images with a radiomics approach. Scientific reports, 9(1):8764, 2019.
  63. Computer-aided classification of hepatocellular ballooning in liver biopsies from patients with nash using persistent homology. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 195:105614, 2020.
  64. Persistent homology approach distinguishes potential pattern between “early” and “not early” hepatic decompensation groups using mri modalities. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, 7(2):488–491, 2021.
  65. Persistent homology of tumor ct scans is associated with survival in lung cancer. Medical physics, 48(11):7043–7051, 2021.
  66. Using persistent homology topological features to characterize medical images: Case studies on lung and brain cancers. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 17(3):2192–2211, 2023.
  67. Persistent brain network homology from the perspective of dendrogram. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 31(12):2267–2277, 2012.
  68. Tracing the evolution of multi-scale functional networks in a mouse model of depression using persistent brain network homology. NeuroImage, 101:351–363, 2014.
  69. A topological classifier to characterize brain states: When shape matters more than variance. Plos one, 18(10):e0292049, 2023.
  70. Persistent homology analysis of brain artery trees. The annals of applied statistics, 10(1):198, 2016.
  71. Decorated merge trees for persistent topology. Journal of Applied and Computational Topology, pages 1–58, 2022.
  72. Topological persistence and simplification. In Proceedings 41st annual symposium on foundations of computer science, pages 454–463. IEEE, 2000.
  73. Computing persistent homology. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 33(2):249–274, 2005.
  74. Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 39(1-3):419–441, 2008.
  75. Allen Hatcher. Algebraic topology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  76. giotto-tda:: A topological data analysis toolkit for machine learning and data exploration. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 22(39):1–6, 2021.
  77. Cubical ripser: Software for computing persistent homology of image and volume data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.12692, 2020.
  78. The gudhi library: Simplicial complexes and persistent homology. In International congress on mathematical software, pages 167–174. Springer, 2014.
  79. Duality in persistent homology of images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04597, 2020.
  80. Minimal cycle representatives in persistent homology using linear programming: an empirical study with user’s guide. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 4:681117, 2021.
  81. The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure. Human brain mapping, 31(5):798–819, 2010.
  82. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17:261–272, 2020.
  83. Optimal homologous cycles, total unimodularity, and linear programming. In Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 221–230, 2010.
  84. Optimal cycles for persistent homology via linear programming. In Optimization in the Real World: Toward Solving Real-World Optimization Problems, pages 79–96. Springer, 2016.
  85. Ippei Obayashi. Volume-optimal cycle: Tightest representative cycle of a generator in persistent homology. SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry, 2(4):508–534, 2018.
  86. Hardness results for homology localization. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 45(3):425–448, 2011.
  87. Lexicographic optimal homologous chains and applications to point cloud triangulations. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 68(4):1155–1174, 2022.
  88. Persistent 1-cycles: Definition, computation, and its application. In Computational Topology in Image Context: 7th International Workshop, CTIC 2019, Málaga, Spain, January 24-25, 2019, Proceedings 7, pages 123–136. Springer, 2019.
  89. Persistent homology analysis for materials research and persistent homology software: Homcloud. journal of the physical society of japan, 91(9):091013, 2022.
  90. The structure and stability of persistence modules, volume 10. Springer, 2016.
  91. 3d shape analysis of the brain’s third ventricle using a midplane encoded symmetric template model. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 129:51–62, 2016.
Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel train-free segmentation approach that leverages cubical persistent homology for robust MRI analysis.
  • It automatically identifies homological signatures in MRI images to detect key geometric anatomical structures.
  • Results on datasets like BraTS, ACDC, and STA show performance approaching U-Net while enhancing model interpretability.

Overview of "Train-Free Segmentation in MRI with Cubical Persistent Homology"

The paper "Train-Free Segmentation in MRI with Cubical Persistent Homology" presents a novel methodology for anatomical segmentation in MRI images utilizing Topological Data Analysis (TDA), specifically leveraging the tools of cubical persistent homology. This algorithm distinguishes itself by requiring no training on annotated datasets, thereby offering an alternative to traditional machine learning models which often rely heavily on large-scale data for effectiveness.

Methodology

The authors introduce a train-free segmentation approach divided into three modules:

  1. Identification of the Whole Object: This step involves selecting the brightest region in the MRI which presumably corresponds to the target structure, based on intensity values. This is accomplished through automatic thresholding, where the exact threshold is identified by analyzing peaks in the number of active pixels within the MRI image.
  2. Detection of the Geometric Object: The method identifies a specific subset of the whole object whose topology is pre-known using persistent homology. It looks for homological signatures like cycles of varying dimensions (e.g., circles, spheres) in the MRI's persistence diagrams and evaluates the connected components that support these features.
  3. Deduction of Remaining Components: After isolating the geometric object, the algorithm deduces other anatomical structures by analyzing interior and exterior regions relative to the topologically detected structure. This strategy adapts the geometric object for specific anatomical shapes, such as detecting spherical glioblastomas, cylindrical myocardiums, or circular cortical plates based on their TDA fingerprint.

Results and Validation

The effectiveness of this method was evaluated on several biomedical datasets, including glioblastoma segmentation (BraTS 2021), cardiac segmentation (ACDC), and cortical plate segmentation in fetal brain MRI (STA). The method demonstrated that, with precise topological modeling, Dice scores approached those of leading algorithms such as U-Net, particularly in datasets where the segmentation aligns well with expected topological signatures.

Notably, a subset of the BraTS dataset satisfying the paper’s topological model assumptions shows improved results, suggesting that the algorithm's viability significantly hinges on the adherence of the data to the specified topological model.

Implications and Future Directions

This approach underscores the potential of non-machine learning methods in scenarios where large labeled datasets are infeasible to curate or where interpretability of the model's internal workings is paramount. By mapping topological features explicitly to segmentation components, the method enhances stability and offers clearer insights into the segmentation process itself—qualities which are crucial in healthcare settings where explainability is as important as accuracy.

Considering the inherent limitations observed—such as varying image quality affecting the robustness of the topological model—future research might focus on enhancing the flexibility of the topological model to better accommodate a broader spectrum of medical images. Moreover, integration with machine learning models could yield hybrid approaches that leverage TDA's interpretability with machine learning’s adaptability.

In summary, the paper sets a precedent in applying TDA independently to image segmentation tasks, challenging the dominance of deep learning approaches by highlighting the power of topological insights. This opens avenues for further exploration into train-free methodologies that offer both robust performance and interpretability.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube