Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Socially Compliant Control of Autonomous Vehicles with Application to Eco-Driving (2401.00830v1)

Published 1 Jan 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Control design of autonomous vehicles (AVs) has mostly focused on achieving a prespecified goal for an individually controlled AV or for a swarm of cooperatively controlled AVs. However, the impact of autonomous driving on human-driven vehicles (HVs) has been largely ignored in AV controller synthesis, which could result in egoistic AV behavior detrimental to the safety of passengers and surrounding traffic. In this study we develop a general framework for socially compliant control design of AVs with a useful metric of social psychology, called social value orientation (SVO), allowing AVs to leverage their impact on the behavior of the following HVs. This is critical since AVs that behave in a socially compliant manner enable human drivers to comprehend their actions and respond appropriately. Within the proposed framework, we define the utilities of the controlled AV and its following vehicle, to be maximized in a weighted fashion determined by the AV's SVO. The utility maximization covers an array of design objectives given the goal of the AV and the benefits for the following HV stemming from the courtesy of socially compliant AV controls. An optimal control problem is then formulated to maximize the utility function defined, which is numerically solved using Pontryagin's minimum principle with optimality guarantees. The methodology developed is applied to synthesize socially compliant control for eco-driving of AVs. A set of numerical results are presented to show the mechanism and effectiveness of the proposed approach using real-world experimental data collected on Highway 55 in Minnesota.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. Thomas B Sheridan. Human–robot interaction: status and challenges. Human Factors, 58(4):525–532, 2016.
  2. Human–robot interaction: a survey. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 1(3):203–275, 2008.
  3. Maged Farouk. Studying human robot interaction and its characteristics. International Journal of Computations, Information and Manufacturing (IJCIM), 2(1):38–49, 2022.
  4. Adapting robot behavior for human–robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(4):911–916, 2008.
  5. Energy and mobility impacts of connected autonomous vehicles with co-optimization of speed and powertrain on mixed vehicle platoons. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 142:103764, 2022.
  6. Optimal control of autonomous vehicles for traffic smoothing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(4):3842–3852, 2022a.
  7. Optimal parking management of connected autonomous vehicles: A control-theoretic approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 124:102924, 2021.
  8. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77:167–181, 2015.
  9. Endogenous market penetration dynamics of automated and connected vehicles: Transport-oriented model and its paradox. Transportation Research Procedia, 27:238–245, 2017.
  10. Optimal policy for integrating autonomous vehicles into the auto market. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 143:103821, 2022b.
  11. Cooperative eco-driving at signalized intersections in a partially connected and automated vehicle environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(5):2029–2038, 2019.
  12. Conflict-point formulation of intersection control for autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 85:528–547, 2017.
  13. Optimal control of automated vehicles for autonomous intersection management with design specifications. Transportation Research Record, 2677(2):1643–1658, 2023a.
  14. A general approach to smoothing nonlinear mixed traffic via control of autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 146:103967, 2023b.
  15. Social behavior for autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(50):24972–24978, 2019.
  16. Vulnerable road users and connected autonomous vehicles interaction: A survey. Sensors, 22(12):4614, 2022.
  17. Social interactions for autonomous driving: A review and perspectives. Foundations and Trends in Robotics, 10(3-4):198–376, 2022c.
  18. Trust dynamics in human autonomous vehicle interaction: a review of trust models. In 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series, pages 85–91. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
  19. A survey on autonomous vehicles interactions with human and other vehicles. In 14th PSAM International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, 2018.
  20. Sharing is caring: Socially-compliant autonomous intersection negotiation. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 6136–6143. IEEE, 2019.
  21. Semi-cooperative control for autonomous emergency vehicles. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 7052–7059. IEEE, 2021.
  22. Socially compatible control design of automated vehicle in mixed traffic. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 6:1730–1735, 2021.
  23. The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2(3):217–230, 1988.
  24. Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(4):353–362, 1989.
  25. Mathematical theory of optimal processes. Interscience, 1962.
  26. Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 71:143–163, 2016.
  27. Car-following models: Fifty years of linear stability analysis-a mathematical perspective. Transportation Planning and Technology, 34(1):3–18, 2011.
  28. Smoothing nonlinear mixed traffic with autonomous vehicles: Control design. In 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 661–666. IEEE, 2022d.
  29. New frontiers of freeway traffic control and estimation. In 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 6910–6925. IEEE, 2022.
  30. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Physical Review E, 62(2):1805–1824, 2000.
  31. Extending ramp metering control to mixed autonomy traffic flow with varying degrees of automation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 151:104119, 2023a.
  32. Traffic flow dynamics. Springer, 2013.
  33. A review of sensing and communication, human factors, and controller aspects for information-aware connected and automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(1):7–29, 2019.
  34. Calibration and evaluation of car following models using real-world driving data. In 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2017.
  35. Calibrating car-following models on urban streets using naturalistic driving data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 149(4):04023011, 2023.
  36. Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(1):296–305, 2013.
  37. Optimal adaptive cruise control with guaranteed string stability. Vehicle System Dynamics, 32(4-5):313–330, 1999.
  38. Model-based string stability of adaptive cruise control systems using field data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 5(1):90–99, 2019a.
  39. Autonomous intelligent cruise control. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 42(4):657–672, 1993.
  40. Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta–analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(1):62–83, 2018.
  41. Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4):733–746, 1997.
  42. Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8):771–781, 2011.
  43. Eco-driving at signalized intersections: A multiple signal optimization approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(5):2943–2955, 2020.
  44. Optimal control and coordination of connected and automated vehicles at urban traffic intersections. In 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 6227–6232. IEEE, 2016.
  45. A decentralized energy-optimal control framework for connected automated vehicles at signal-free intersections. Automatica, 93:244–256, 2018.
  46. Optimal Control of Dynamic Systems Driven by Vector Measures: Theory and Applications. Springer, 2021.
  47. Optimal control and stabilization of building maintenance units based on minimum principle. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 17(4):1713–1727, 2021.
  48. Modeling adaptive cruise control vehicles from experimental data: model comparison. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pages 3049–3054. IEEE, 2019b.
  49. A unified computational approach to optimal control problems. Longman Scientific and Technical, 1991.
  50. Capacity implications of personalized adaptive cruise control. In 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 2023b.
  51. Real-time traffic prediction considering lane changing maneuvers with application to eco-driving control of electric vehicles. In 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (1)
  1. Shian Wang (5 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.