Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Noise-Aware and Equitable Urban Air Traffic Management: An Optimization Approach (2401.00806v1)

Published 1 Jan 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Urban air mobility (UAM), a transformative concept for the transport of passengers and cargo, faces several integration challenges in complex urban environments. Community acceptance of aircraft noise is among the most noticeable of these challenges when launching or scaling up a UAM system. Properly managing community noise is fundamental to establishing a UAM system that is environmentally and socially sustainable. In this work, we develop a holistic and equitable approach to manage UAM air traffic and its community noise impact in urban environments. The proposed approach is a hybrid approach that considers a mix of different noise mitigation strategies, including limiting the number of operations, cruising at higher altitudes, and ambient noise masking. We tackle the problem through the lens of network system control and formulate a multi-objective optimization model for managing traffic flow in a multi-layer UAM network while concurrently pursuing demand fulfiLLMent, noise control, and energy saving. Further, we use a social welfare function in the optimization model as the basis for the efficiency-fairness trade-off in both demand fulfiLLMent and noise control. We apply the proposed approach to a comprehensive case study in the city of Austin and perform design trade-offs through both visual and quantitative analyses.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. Developing virtual acoustic terrain for urban air mobility trajectory planning, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 120 (2023) 103794.
  2. Urban air mobility: History, ecosystem, market potential, and challenges, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22 (2021) 6074–6087.
  3. Analysis of urban air mobility operational constraints, Journal of Air Transportation 26 (2018) 133–146.
  4. P. D. Vascik, R. J. Hansman, Constraint identification in on-demand mobility for aviation through an exploratory case study of los angeles, in: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, p. 3083.
  5. On the understanding of the current status of urban air mobility development and its future prospects: Commuting in a flying vehicle as a new paradigm, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 166 (2022) 102868.
  6. P. D. Vascik, R. J. Hansman, Evaluation of key operational constraints affecting on-demand mobility for aviation in the los angeles basin: ground infrastructure, air traffic control and noise, in: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, p. 3084.
  7. Multi-level aircraft feature representation and selection for aviation environmental impact analysis, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 143 (2022) 103824.
  8. Prediction-based approaches for generation of noise-power-distance data with application to urban air mobility vehicles, in: 28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics 2022 Conference, p. 2839.
  9. Comparison of two community noise models applied to a nasa urban air mobility concept vehicle, in: 50th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (Inter-Noise 2021).
  10. Urban air mobility: Preliminary noise analysis of commuter operations, in: AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum, p. 3204.
  11. H. K. Ng, Noise impact analysis for urban air mobility in dallas-fort worth metroplex, in: AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum, p. 3404.
  12. Efficient prediction of urban air mobility noise in a vertiport environment, Aerospace Science and Technology 139 (2023) 108410.
  13. Assessment of uam and drone noise impact on the environment based on virtual flights, Aerospace Science and Technology 118 (2021) 106996.
  14. Vertiport planning for urban aerial mobility: An adaptive discretization approach, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 24 (2022) 3215–3235.
  15. Vertiport selection in hybrid air-ground transportation networks via mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems (2023) 1–12.
  16. Risk-aware urban air mobility network design with overflow redundancy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05581 (2023).
  17. L. C. Willey, J. L. Salmon, A method for urban air mobility network design using hub location and subgraph isomorphism, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 125 (2021) 102997.
  18. Complexity optimal air traffic assignment in multi-layer transport network for urban air mobility operations, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 142 (2022) 103776.
  19. Alpha-fair routing in urban air mobility with risk-aware constraints, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00135 (2023).
  20. Probabilistic representatives mining (prem): A clustering method for distributional data reduction, AIAA Journal 60 (2022) 2580–2596.
  21. Y. H. Yu, Rotor blade–vortex interaction noise, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 36 (2000) 97–115.
  22. S. A. Rizzi, M. Rafaelof, On the modeling of uam aircraft community noise in aedt helicopter mode, in: AIAA AVIATION 2023 Forum, p. 3363.
  23. S. A. Rizzi, M. Rafaelof, Second generation uam community noise assessment using the faa aviation environmental design tool, in: AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, p. 2167.
  24. Continuous descent approach: Design and flight test for louisville international airport, Journal of Aircraft 41 (2004) 1054–1066.
  25. Improved noise abatement departure procedure modeling for aviation environmental impact assessment, in: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum.
  26. E. Greenwood, Helicopter flight procedures for community noise reduction, in: American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, NF1676L-25361.
  27. A. Montlaur, L. Delgado, Flight and passenger efficiency-fairness trade-off for atfm delay assignment, Journal of Air Transport Management 83 (2020) 101758.
  28. Efficient and fair traffic flow management for on-demand air mobility, CEAS Aeronautical Journal (2021) 1–11.
  29. An optimization approach for airport slot allocation under iata guidelines, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 112 (2018) 132–156.
  30. K. G. Zografos, Y. Jiang, A bi-objective efficiency-fairness model for scheduling slots at congested airports, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 102 (2019) 336–350.
  31. Equitable and efficient coordination in traffic flow management, Transportation science 46 (2012) 262–280.
  32. Air traffic flow management integrating separation management and ground holding: An efficiency-equity bi-objective perspective, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 155 (2022) 394–423.
  33. Fairness, efficiency, and flexibility in organ allocation for kidney transplantation, Operations Research 61 (2013) 73–87.
  34. K. S. Shehadeh, L. V. Snyder, Equity in stochastic healthcare facility location, in: Uncertainty in Facility Location Problems, Springer, 2023, pp. 303–334.
  35. On the efficiency-fairness trade-off, Management Science 58 (2012) 2234–2250.
  36. Z. Gao, D. N. Mavris, Statistics and machine learning in aviation environmental impact analysis: A survey of recent progress, Aerospace 9 (2022) 750.
  37. Aviation noise impacts: state of the science, Noise & health 19 (2017) 41.
  38. Minimax and multi-criteria selection of representative model portfolios for complex systems analysis, AIAA Journal 60 (2022) 1505–1521.
  39. Development of a noise-based route optioneering tool for advanced air mobility (aam) vehicles, in: 28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics 2022 Conference, p. 2836.
  40. Vtol urban air mobility concept vehicles for technology development, in: 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, p. 3847.
  41. E. Seto, C.-H. Huang, The national transportation noise exposure map, medRxiv (2023) 2023–02.
  42. Air corridors: Concept, design, simulation, and rules of engagement, Sensors 21 (2021) 7536.
  43. Air traffic assignment for intensive urban air mobility operations, Journal of Aerospace Information Systems 18 (2021) 860–875.
  44. A. Bauranov, J. Rakas, Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 125 (2021) 100726.
  45. The vulnerability analysis of the multi-layer air transport system, in: 2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), IEEE, pp. 956–962.
  46. A multilayered block network model to forecast large dynamic transportation graphs: An application to us air transport, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 137 (2022) 103556.
  47. V. Xinying Chen, J. Hooker, A guide to formulating fairness in an optimization model, Annals of Operations Research (2023) 1–39.
  48. An axiomatic theory of fairness in network resource allocation, in: 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 1–9.
  49. T. Lipp, S. Boyd, Variations and extension of the convex–concave procedure, Optimization and Engineering 17 (2016) 263–287.
  50. Introducing structural considerations into complexity metrics, Air Traffic Control Quarterly 10 (2002) 115–130.
  51. Air traffic complexity based on non linear dynamical systems, in: ATM 2003, 5th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, pp. pp–xxxx.
  52. Role of flying cars in sustainable mobility, Nature communications 10 (2019) 1555.
  53. Conceptual design of the joby s2 electric vtol pav, in: 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, p. 2407.
  54. A. Stoll, J. Bevirt, Development of evtol aircraft for urban air mobility at joby aviation, in: The Vertical Flight Society’s 78th Annual Forum FortWorth, TX, USA.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.