Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Digger: Detecting Copyright Content Mis-usage in Large Language Model Training (2401.00676v1)

Published 1 Jan 2024 in cs.CR, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: Pre-training, which utilizes extensive and varied datasets, is a critical factor in the success of LLMs across numerous applications. However, the detailed makeup of these datasets is often not disclosed, leading to concerns about data security and potential misuse. This is particularly relevant when copyrighted material, still under legal protection, is used inappropriately, either intentionally or unintentionally, infringing on the rights of the authors. In this paper, we introduce a detailed framework designed to detect and assess the presence of content from potentially copyrighted books within the training datasets of LLMs. This framework also provides a confidence estimation for the likelihood of each content sample's inclusion. To validate our approach, we conduct a series of simulated experiments, the results of which affirm the framework's effectiveness in identifying and addressing instances of content misuse in LLM training processes. Furthermore, we investigate the presence of recognizable quotes from famous literary works within these datasets. The outcomes of our study have significant implications for ensuring the ethical use of copyrighted materials in the development of LLMs, highlighting the need for more transparent and responsible data management practices in this field.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. 2023. Z-Library. https://zlibrary-africa.se/. (2023).
  2. Stéphane Aroca-Ouellette and Frank Rudzicz. 2020. On losses for modern language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01694 (2020).
  3. Quantifying memorization across neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07646 (2022).
  4. Extracting training data from large language models. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21). 2633–2650.
  5. Speak, memory: An archaeology of books known to chatgpt/gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00118 (2023).
  6. Tom Fawcett. 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern recognition letters 27, 8 (2006), 861–874.
  7. On the definiteness of earth mover’s distance and its relation to set intersection. IEEE transactions on cybernetics 48, 11 (2017), 3184–3196.
  8. Goodreads. 2023. goodreads-Popular quotes. (2023). https://www.goodreads.com/quotes
  9. Guardian. 2023. ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch. (2023). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/02/chatgpt-100-million-users-open-ai-fastest-growing-app
  10. Training data leakage analysis in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.05405 (2021).
  11. Deep learning. nature 521, 7553 (2015), 436–444.
  12. Do language models plagiarize?. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. 3637–3647.
  13. Analyzing leakage of personally identifiable information in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00539 (2023).
  14. Charles E Metz. 1978. Basic principles of ROC analysis. In Seminars in nuclear medicine, Vol. 8. Elsevier, 283–298.
  15. Quantifying privacy risks of masked language models using membership inference attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03929 (2022).
  16. Language models as knowledge bases? arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01066 (2019).
  17. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. (2018).
  18. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 1, 8 (2019), 9.
  19. Russell Reed and Robert J MarksII. 1999. Neural smithing: supervised learning in feedforward artificial neural networks. Mit Press.
  20. REUTERS. 2023-02-06. Getty Images lawsuit says Stability AI misused photos to train AI. (2023-02-06). https://www.reuters.com/legal/getty-images-lawsuit-says-stability-ai-misused-photos-train-ai-2023-02-06/
  21. Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nature communications 10, 1 (2019), 1–9.
  22. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In 2017 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP). IEEE, 3–18.
  23. Congzheng Song and Ananth Raghunathan. 2020. Information leakage in embedding models. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 377–390.
  24. Diffusion earth mover’s distance and distribution embeddings. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 10336–10346.
  25. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023).
  26. Thomas Vakili and Hercules Dalianis. 2021. Are Clinical BERT Models Privacy Preserving? The Difficulty of Extracting Patient-Condition Associations.. In HUMAN@ AAAI Fall Symposium.
  27. Approximating the Earth Mover’s Distance between sets of geometric objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08136 (2021).
  28. Enhanced membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 3093–3106.
  29. Privacy risk in machine learning: Analyzing the connection to overfitting. In 2018 IEEE 31st computer security foundations symposium (CSF). IEEE, 268–282.
  30. MoverScore: Text generation evaluating with contextualized embeddings and earth mover distance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.02622 (2019).
Citations (17)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces Digger, a framework that leverages loss gap analysis to identify copyrighted content in LLM training datasets.
  • The methodology compares model outputs before and after fine-tuning to generate a confidence score for potential copyright misuse.
  • The study underscores ethical AI practices by offering an open-source tool and discussing scalability and legal considerations.

Introduction to the Challenge

The field of LLMs such as GPT-2, LLaMA, and GPT-3 has seen vast applications in text generation, classification, and translation, heralding significant advancements in AI capabilities. The training of these models, pivotal to their success, leverages extensive datasets derived from diverse sources, including web pages and social media. These datasets, however, often contain copyrighted material, raising concerns over potential copyright infringements. The proprietary nature or access restrictions of such datasets compound the complexity, making it imperative to develop mechanisms for detecting and addressing copyright misuse efficiently and ethically.

Digger: The Proposed Framework

This research introduces Digger, a comprehensive framework designed to detect the presence and assess the use of potentially copyrighted books within LLM training datasets. Digger operates on the principle of observing changes in language loss (or "loss gap") as an indicator of material use during model training. Central to Digger's approach is the comparison of LLM inference output before and after specific fine-tuning processes, providing a confidence score that estimates the probability of copyright content being part of an LLM's foundational training materials.

Empirical Study and Findings

The application of Digger in simulated experiments demonstrates its efficacy. Using GPT-2 for empirical studies, Digger presented an accuracy of 84.750% and a recall of 92.428% in identifying copyright infringements in controlled settings. Moreover, applying the framework to sample quotes from notable literary works further validated Digger's robustness in real-world scenarios. The research also highlighted the influence of model size and the diversity of training material on infringement detection efficacy, underscoring the nuanced challenges of establishing a universally applicable loss criterion.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The paper contributes significantly to both theoretical understanding and practical approaches in ethical AI development. From a theoretical perspective, it enriches the discourse on the nature of LLM training data composition and its implications for copyright law adherence. Practically, Digger offers a valuable tool for AI researchers and developers, promoting transparency and responsibility in the use of copyrighted materials in LLM training datasets. Furthermore, the open-source availability of Digger as an anonymous project encourages community engagement and iterative enhancement of copyright detection methodologies in LLM training processes.

Future Directions and Considerations

While Digger marks a substantial step forward, it also opens avenues for future research. Addressing the scalability of the framework to accommodate larger, more complex LLMs and exploring the integration of advanced statistical techniques for more refined confidence score calculations are areas ripe for exploration. Additionally, the adaptability of Digger in various legal jurisdictions, considering the variability of copyright laws, warrants further investigation. Lastly, the ongoing development and public discourse on the ethical use of AI emphasize the need for evolving frameworks like Digger in tandem with legal and societal expectations.

Conclusion

This paper underscores the paramount importance of ethical considerations in the development and application of LLMs. By introducing Digger, researchers have equipped the AI community with a robust framework for detecting and addressing copyright content misuse in LLM training datasets, paving the way for more responsible AI advancements. As the AI landscape continues to evolve, tools like Digger are essential in ensuring that the march towards innovation remains aligned with ethical and legal standards.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown