Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Teaching Digital Accessibility to Industry Professionals using the Community of Practice Framework: An Experience Report (2401.00449v1)

Published 31 Dec 2023 in cs.SE and cs.CY

Abstract: Despite recent initiatives aimed at improving accessibility, the field of digital accessibility remains markedly behind contemporary advancements in the software industry as a large number of real world software and web applications continue to fall short of accessibility requirements. A persisting skills deficit within the existing technology workforce has been an enduring impediment, hindering organizations from delivering truly accessible software products. This, in turn, elevates the risk of isolating and excluding a substantial portion of potential users. In this paper, we report lessons learned from a training program for teaching digital accessibility using the Communities of Practice (CoP) framework to industry professionals. We recruited 66 participants from a large multi-national software company and assigned them to two groups: one participating in a CoP and the other using self-paced learning. We report experiences from designing the training program, conducting the actual training, and assessing the efficiency of the two approaches. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for practitioners in Learning and Development teams and educators in designing accessibility courses for industry professionals.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. 2023. Bridging The Accessible Technology Skills Gap: Teach Access 2023 Survey & Analysis. https://teachaccess.org/accessibility-skills-gap/.
  2. 2023. WebAIM: The WebAIM Million - The 2023 Report on the Accessibility of the Top 1,000,000 Home Pages. https://webaim.org/projects/million/.
  3. Apple Inc. nd. Apple Human Interface Guidelines - Accessibility. https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/accessibility/overview/introduction/.
  4. A Systematic Analysis of Accessibility in Computing Education Research. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366843
  5. Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the ”Other”. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528
  6. Integrating Accessibility in a Mobile App Development Course. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. ACM, Toronto ON Canada, 1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569825
  7. Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner’s Perspective. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 31, 4 (Oct. 2022), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503508
  8. Doug Clow. 2013. MOOCs and the Funnel of Participation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460332
  9. Accessibility in Introductory Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047344.1047367
  10. Jennifer L. Cuddapah and Christine D. Clayton. 2011. Using Wenger’s Communities of Practice to Explore a New Teacher Cohort. Journal of Teacher Education 62, 1 (Jan. 2011), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110377507
  11. Pınar ONAY Durdu and Zehra Yerli̇kaya. 2020. The Perception of Website Accessibility: A Survey of Turkish Software Professionals. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology 11, 41 (Aug. 2020), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2020.02.003.x
  12. Presenting and Evaluating the Impact of Experiential Learning in Computing Accessibility Education. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training. ACM, Seoul South Korea, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377814.3381710
  13. Yasmine N. El-Glaly. 2020. Teaching Accessibility to Software Engineering Students. In Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE (SIGCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, Portland, OR, USA, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366914
  14. Accessibility of Web and Multimedia Content: Techniques and Examples from the Educational Context. In Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2526188.2528538
  15. Feedback on Professional Skills as Enculturation into Communities of Practice: Feedback on Professional Skills as Enculturation. Journal of Engineering Education 104, 1 (Jan. 2015), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20061
  16. Google Inc. nd. Google - Developing for Accessibility. https://www.google.com/accessibility/for-developers/.
  17. Govt of India. nd. GIGW 3.0: Guidelines for Indian Government Websites. https://guidelines.india.gov.in.
  18. Infusing Accessibility into Programming Courses. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451625
  19. Margarita Jimenez-Silva and Kate Olson. 2012. A Community of Practice in Teacher Education: Insights and Perceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 24, 3 (2012), 335–348.
  20. Katy Jordan. 2014. Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15, 1 (2014), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
  21. Swaroop Joshi and Neelam Soundarajan. 2017. Using Anonymity and Rounds-Based Structure for Effective Online Discussions in STEM Courses. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. ASEE Conferences, Columbus, Ohio, 29070. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--29070
  22. A General Education Course on Universal Access, Disability, Technology and Society. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878808
  23. Stephanie Ludi. 2007. Introducing Accessibility Requirements through External Stakeholder Utilization in an Undergraduate Requirements Engineering Course. In 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’07). IEEE, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2007.46
  24. The Landscape of Accessibility Skill Set in the Software Industry Positions. In The 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Athens Greece, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550389
  25. Kristina Rungano Masuwa-Morgan. 2008. Introducing AccessOnto: Ontology for Accessibility Requirements Specification. In 2008 First International Workshop on Ontologies in Interactive Systems. 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/ONTORACT.2008.18
  26. “Assistec” – A University Course on Assistive Technologies. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Klaus Miesenberger, Joachim Klaus, Wolfgang L. Zagler, Arthur I. Karshmer, David Hutchison, Takeo Kanade, Josef Kittler, Jon M. Kleinberg, Friedemann Mattern, John C. Mitchell, Moni Naor, Oscar Nierstrasz, C. Pandu Rangan, Bernhard Steffen, Madhu Sudan, Demetri Terzopoulos, Dough Tygar, Moshe Y. Vardi, and Gerhard Weikum (Eds.). Vol. 4061. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/11788713_54
  27. Microsoft Inc. 2016. Microsoft Design: Inclusive Design Toolkit. https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/.
  28. Maria Paasivaara. 2021. Teaching the Scrum Master Role Using Professional Agile Coaches and Communities of Practice. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET). IEEE, Madrid, ES, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET52601.2021.00012
  29. Teaching Inclusive Thinking in Undergraduate Computing. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Baltimore Maryland USA, 399–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134808
  30. Why Software Is Not Accessible: Technology Professionals’ Perspectives and Challenges. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383103
  31. The Importance of Community in Fostering Change: A Qualitative Case Study of the Rigorous Research in Engineering Education (RREE) Program. Studies in Engineering Education 1, 1 (Oct. 2020), 20. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.7
  32. Brian J. Rosmaita. 2006. Accessibility Now!: Teaching Accessible Computing at the Introductory Level. In Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 277–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/1168987.1169053
  33. Accessibility as a First-Class Concern in Teaching GUIs and Software Engineering (Abstract Only). In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 701. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3022393
  34. Keith Smolkowski. 2019. Gain Score Analysis. https://homes.ori.org/keiths/Tips/Stats_GainScores.html.
  35. Making Facebook.Com Accessible to as Many People as Possible.
  36. The US Government. 2023. IT Accessibility Laws and Policies. https://www.section508.gov/manage/laws-and-policies/.
  37. Garreth W. Tigwell. 2021. Nuanced Perspectives Toward Disability Simulations from Digital Designers, Blind, Low Vision, and Color Blind People. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445620
  38. Exploration on Integrating Accessibility into an AI Course. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Providence RI USA, 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499399
  39. Mike Wald. 2008. Design of a 10 Credit Masters Level Assistive Technologies and Universal Design Module. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP ’08). Springer, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_27
  40. Including Accessibility within and beyond Undergraduate Computing Courses. In Proceeding of the Eleventh International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS ’09. ACM Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 155. https://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639670
  41. Ye Diana Wang. 2012. A Holistic and Pragmatic Approach to Teaching Web Accessibility in an Undergraduate Web Design Course. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380552.2380568
  42. Etienne Wenger. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System. Systems thinker 9, 5 (1998), 2–3.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Parthasarathy PD (2 papers)
  2. Swaroop Joshi (4 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now