Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Unsupversied feature correlation model to predict breast abnormal variation maps in longitudinal mammograms (2312.16772v1)

Published 28 Dec 2023 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Breast cancer continues to be a significant cause of mortality among women globally. Timely identification and precise diagnosis of breast abnormalities are critical for enhancing patient prognosis. In this study, we focus on improving the early detection and accurate diagnosis of breast abnormalities, which is crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing the mortality rate of breast cancer. To address the limitations of traditional screening methods, a novel unsupervised feature correlation network was developed to predict maps indicating breast abnormal variations using longitudinal 2D mammograms. The proposed model utilizes the reconstruction process of current year and prior year mammograms to extract tissue from different areas and analyze the differences between them to identify abnormal variations that may indicate the presence of cancer. The model is equipped with a feature correlation module, an attention suppression gate, and a breast abnormality detection module that work together to improve the accuracy of the prediction. The proposed model not only provides breast abnormal variation maps, but also distinguishes between normal and cancer mammograms, making it more advanced compared to the state-of the-art baseline models. The results of the study show that the proposed model outperforms the baseline models in terms of Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Dice score, and cancer detection rate.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (53)
  1. DeepCAD: A computer-aided diagnosis system for mammographic masses using deep invariant features 5, 28. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/5/4/28, doi:10.3390/computers5040028. number: 4 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  2. Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography. BMC bioinformatics 21, 1–19.
  3. A region based convolutional network for tumor detection and classification in breast mammography, in: Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications: First International Workshop, LABELS 2016, and Second International Workshop, DLMIA 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Athens, Greece, October 21, 2016, Proceedings 2, Springer. pp. 197–205.
  4. Detection and classification of the breast abnormalities in digital mammograms via regional convolutional neural network, in: 2017 39th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), IEEE. pp. 1230–1233.
  5. Connected-unets: a deep learning architecture for breast mass segmentation. NPJ Breast Cancer 7, 151.
  6. Feature fusion siamese network for breast cancer detection comparing current and prior mammograms. Medical Physics 49, 3654–3669.
  7. Applying deep learning in digital breast tomosynthesis for automatic breast cancer detection: A review. Medical image analysis 71, 102049.
  8. Bridges-2: a platform for rapidly-evolving and data intensive research, in: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing, pp. 1–4.
  9. Automated mass detection from mammograms using deep learning and random forest .
  10. Mammogram classification and abnormality detection from nonlocal labels using deep multiple instance neural network., in: VCBM, pp. 11–19.
  11. Early detection and screening for breast cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 33, 141–155. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208117300190, doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2017.02.009.
  12. Deep learning and structured prediction for the segmentation of mass in mammograms, in: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part I, Springer. pp. 605–612.
  13. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 39, 1755–1760. doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00259-4.
  14. Sigmoid-weighted linear units for neural network function approximation in reinforcement learning. Neural Networks 107, 3–11.
  15. Probabilistic visual search for masses within mammography images using deep learning, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), IEEE. pp. 1310–1315.
  16. GlimpseNet: Attentional methods for full-image mammogram diagnosis , 9.
  17. Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 770–778.
  18. Digital mammographic tumor classification using transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks 3. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992049/, doi:10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.034501.
  19. The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 18, 1137–1154; quiz 1243–1244. doi:10.1148/radiographics.18.5.9747612.
  20. Self-transfer learning for fully weakly supervised object localization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.01625 .
  21. Unsupervised image segmentation by backpropagation, in: 2018 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), IEEE. pp. 1543–1547.
  22. Unsupervised learning of image segmentation based on differentiable feature clustering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29, 8055–8068.
  23. Medical image description using multi-task-loss cnn, in: Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications: First International Workshop, LABELS 2016, and Second International Workshop, DLMIA 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Athens, Greece, October 21, 2016, Proceedings 1, Springer. pp. 121–129.
  24. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network. Medical physics 44, 1017–1027.
  25. A comparison between a deep convolutional neural network and radiologists for classifying regions of interest in mammography, in: International Workshop on Breast Imaging, Springer. pp. 51–56.
  26. Classifying symmetrical differences and temporal change for the detection of malignant masses in mammography using deep neural networks 4, 044501. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633751/, doi:10.1117/1.JMI.4.4.044501.
  27. Attention dense-u-net for automatic breast mass segmentation in digital mammogram. IEEE Access 7, 59037–59047.
  28. A multiple circular path convolution neural network system for detection of mammographic masses. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 21, 150–158.
  29. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 3431–3440.
  30. A multi-scale cnn and curriculum learning strategy for mammogram classification, in: Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer, pp. 169–177.
  31. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation, in: 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV), Ieee. pp. 565–571.
  32. Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma. Journal of surgical oncology 96, 457–463.
  33. 3d mri brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization, in: Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries: 4th International Workshop, BrainLes 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 16, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part II 4, Springer. pp. 311–320.
  34. Harms of breast cancer screening: Systematic review to update the 2009 u.s. preventive services task force recommendation. Annals of Internal Medicine 164, 256–267. doi:10.7326/M15-0970.
  35. Attention u-net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03999 .
  36. National expenditure for false-positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnoses estimated at $4 billion a year. Health Affairs 34, 576–583. URL: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1087, doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1087. publisher: Health Affairs.
  37. Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks in mammography. Scientific Reports 13, 2925.
  38. Learning from longitudinal mammography studies, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 712–720.
  39. Automated breast cancer diagnosis using deep learning and region of interest detection (bc-droid), in: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on bioinformatics, computational biology, and health informatics, pp. 536–543.
  40. Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with deep learning 8, 1–7. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22437-z, doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z. number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  41. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images 15, 598–610. doi:10.1109/42.538937. conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
  42. U-net and its variants for medical image segmentation: A review of theory and applications. Ieee Access 9, 82031–82057.
  43. Cancer statistics, 2020 70, 7–30. URL: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3322/caac.21590, doi:10.3322/caac.21590. _eprint: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3322/caac.21590.
  44. American cancer society guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003 53, 141–169. URL: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141, doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141. _eprint: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141.
  45. A preliminary study on breast cancer risk analysis using deep neural network, in: Breast Imaging: 13th International Workshop, IWDM 2016, Malmö, Sweden, June 19-22, 2016, Proceedings 13, Springer. pp. 385–391.
  46. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91, 1724–1731. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010501)91:9<1724::aid-cncr1190>3.0.co;2-v.
  47. Malignancy detection on mammography using dual deep convolutional neural networks and genetically discovered false color input enhancement 30, 499. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537100/, doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9993-2. publisher: Springer.
  48. Unsupervised deep learning for stroke lesion segmentation on follow-up ct based on generative adversarial networks. American Journal of Neuroradiology 43, 1107–1114.
  49. Deep neural networks improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 39, 1184–1194. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427471/, doi:10.1109/TMI.2019.2945514.
  50. Loss functions for image restoration with neural networks. IEEE Transactions on computational imaging 3, 47–57.
  51. A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promises 109, 820–838. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2021.3054390. conference Name: Proceedings of the IEEE.
  52. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation, in: Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: 4th International Workshop, DLMIA 2018, and 8th International Workshop, ML-CDS 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018, Proceedings 4, Springer. pp. 3–11.
  53. Adversarial deep structural networks for mammographic mass segmentation. Biorxiv , 095786.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Jun Bai (16 papers)
  2. Annie Jin (1 paper)
  3. Madison Adams (1 paper)
  4. Clifford Yang (1 paper)
  5. Sheida Nabavi (5 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.