Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Randomized Signature Methods in Optimal Portfolio Selection (2312.16448v1)

Published 27 Dec 2023 in q-fin.PM, cs.AI, cs.LG, and q-fin.PR

Abstract: We present convincing empirical results on the application of Randomized Signature Methods for non-linear, non-parametric drift estimation for a multi-variate financial market. Even though drift estimation is notoriously ill defined due to small signal to noise ratio, one can still try to learn optimal non-linear maps from data to future returns for the purposes of portfolio optimization. Randomized Signatures, in contrast to classical signatures, allow for high dimensional market dimension and provide features on the same scale. We do not contribute to the theory of Randomized Signatures here, but rather present our empirical findings on portfolio selection in real world settings including real market data and transaction costs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. Applications of Signature Methods to Market Anomaly Detection. Papers 2201.02441. arXiv.org. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2201.02441.html.
  2. In Defense of Portfolio Optimization: What If We Can Forecast? Financial Analysts Journal 75, 20–38. doi:10.1080/0015198X.2019.1600958.
  3. Factor-based portfolio optimization. Economics Letters , 111137.
  4. Least-squares approach to risk parity in portfolio selection. Quantitative Finance 16, 357–376.
  5. Machine learning and portfolio optimization. Management Science 64, 1136–1154.
  6. Optimal stopping with signatures. The Annals of Applied Probability 33, 238–273.
  7. Global portfolio optimization. Financial analysts journal 48, 28–43.
  8. Simple heresy: Rules of thumb challenge complex financial analyses. Science News 179, 26–29. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/scin.5591791221, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/scin.5591791221, arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/scin.5591791221.
  9. Benchmarking, portfolio insurance and technical analysis: a monte carlo comparison of dynamic strategies of asset allocation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27, 987–1011.
  10. A primer on the signature method in machine learning. arXiv:1603.03788.
  11. Multi-period mean–variance portfolio optimization based on monte-carlo simulation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 64, 23–38.
  12. Risk parity portfolio optimization under a markov regime-switching framework. Quantitative Finance 19, 453–471.
  13. Discrete-time signatures and randomness in reservoir computing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 33, 6321–6330.
  14. Expressive power of randomized signature, in: The Symbiosis of Deep Learning and Differential Equations.
  15. Signature methods in stochastic portfolio theory URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02322.
  16. Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies 22, 1915–1953. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm075.
  17. A monte carlo method for optimal portfolios. The journal of Finance 58, 401–446.
  18. Combining equilibrium, resampling, and analyst’s views in portfolio optimization. Journal of Banking & Finance 36, 1354–1361.
  19. Stochastic portfolio theory. Springer.
  20. Signature trading: A path-dependent extension of the mean-variance framework with exogenous signals. arXiv:2308.15135.
  21. Volatility is (mostly) path-dependent. Quantitative Finance 23, 1221–1258. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2023.2221281, doi:10.1080/14697688.2023.2221281, arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2023.2221281.
  22. Extracting information from the signature of a financial data stream URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7244.
  23. Deep learning for finance: deep portfolios. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 33, 3–12.
  24. A century of evidence on trend-following investing. THE JOURNALOF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT .
  25. Profitability of momentum strategies: An evaluation of alternative explanations. The Journal of Finance 56, 699–720. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/222579.
  26. Extensions of lipschitz maps into a hilbert space. Contemporary Mathematics 26, 189–206. doi:10.1090/conm/026/737400.
  27. Building portfolios based on machine learning predictions. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 35, 19–37. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1875865, doi:10.1080/1331677X.2021.1875865, arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1875865.
  28. Robustness in portfolio optimization. The Journal of Portfolio Management .
  29. Nonlinear shrinkage of the covariance matrix for portfolio selection: Markowitz meets goldilocks. Review of Financial Studies 30, 4349–4388. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhx052.
  30. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets, in: Stochastic optimization models in finance. Elsevier, pp. 131–155.
  31. Numerical method for model-free pricing of exotic derivatives in discrete time using rough path signatures. Applied Mathematical Finance 26, 583–597.
  32. Non-parametric pricing and hedging of exotic derivatives. Applied Mathematical Finance 27, 457–494.
  33. Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. John Wiley.
  34. The markowitz optimization enigma: Is ’optimized’ optimal? Financial Analysts Journal 45, 31–42. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4479185.
  35. A generalised signature method for multivariate time series feature extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00873 .
  36. Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society , 768–783.
  37. nlshrink: Non-Linear Shrinkage Estimation of Population Eigenvalues and Covariance Matrices. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlshrink. r package version 1.0.1.
  38. Risk parity portfolios with risk factors. Quantitative Finance 16, 377–388.
  39. The impact of proportional transaction costs on systematically generated portfolios. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics 11, 881–896. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1282313, doi:10.1137/19M1282313, arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1282313.
  40. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance 19, 425–442.
  41. Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business 39, 119–138. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2351741.
  42. Lectures on the theory of estimation of many parameters. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 34(1):1373–1403. .
  43. Market value, time, and risk. Time, and Risk (August 8, 1961) .
  44. Toward a theory of market value of risky assets.
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates a novel framework leveraging Randomized Signature Methods for non-linear drift estimation in portfolio optimization.
  • The methodology outperforms traditional linear models and momentum strategies, achieving higher annualized returns and Sharpe ratios.
  • Empirical tests validate the practical utility of the approach under varying market conditions and transaction costs, advancing robust portfolio management.

Empirical Evaluation of Randomized Signature Methods in Portfolio Optimization

Introduction

The cornerstone of quantitative finance has been optimal portfolio construction, a task that involves balancing the expected return against risk. Traditionally, this has been approached through methodologies like Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which rely on the quantification of expected returns and risk, typically through linear models. However, the assumption of linear relationships and normal distributions of returns often does not hold in practice, particularly given the complexities and non-linear characteristics of financial markets. This paper explores the application of Randomized Signature Methods as a non-linear, non-parametric approach to drift estimation in multi-variate financial markets for portfolio optimization, moving beyond traditional linear models.

Theoretical Background

Randomized Signatures stem from rough path theory and provide a way to handle high-dimensional data by transforming paths into feature sets that capture the non-linear dynamics within the data. Unlike classical signatures, Randomized Signatures can deal with the curse of dimensionality and are robust across different scales, making them particularly suitable for financial markets where asset prices exhibit complex, path-dependent behaviors. This approach does not significantly contribute to new theoretical insights into Randomized Signatures themselves but rather showcases their practical application in portfolio optimization, evidenced through real market data and considering transaction costs.

Methodology and Empirical Findings

The paper introduces a refined framework for optimal portfolio selection employing Randomized Signature Methods for non-linear drift estimation. This involves generating features from historical price data, which are then used to forecast future returns. The novelty lies in the method's ability to exploit the full trajectory of asset prices, capturing critical non-linear dynamics like volatility and autocorrelation, often overlooked by linear models.

The empirical evaluation covers simulated and real-world data, comparing the performance of portfolios optimized using Randomized Signatures against those constructed via traditional linear regression, momentum strategies, and the naive 1/n portfolio. The simulation results indicate a distinctive outperformance of the Randomized Signature approach across a range of metrics, including annualized returns and Sharpe ratios. Furthermore, the method's robustness is tested under varying market conditions and transaction costs, illustrating its practicality for real-world application.

Impacts and Future Directions

The utilization of Randomized Signature Methods in portfolio optimization presents a compelling alternative to traditional linear models, especially in handling non-linear, path-dependent features of asset prices. This research opens avenues for integrating advanced mathematical models into financial decision-making, potentially leading to more robust portfolio construction methodologies that better capture the complexities of the market.

Future work could explore theoretical aspects of how Randomized Signatures capture market dynamics or extend the methodology to incorporate additional market factors or asset classes. Moreover, the adaptability of the approach under different regulatory environments or for varied investment objectives poses an interesting area for further investigation.

Conclusion

This paper successfully demonstrates the efficacy of Randomized Signature Methods in enhancing portfolio optimization through superior non-linear drift estimation. The empirical results underscore the potential of such advanced mathematical approaches in elevating the standards of portfolio management strategies, marking a significant step forward in the intersection of machine learning and finance.