Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Instrumental Variables based DREM for Online Asymptotic Identification of Perturbed Linear Systems (2312.15631v2)

Published 25 Dec 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Existing online continuous-time parameter estimation laws provide exact (asymptotic/exponential or finite/fixed time) identification of dynamical linear/nonlinear systems parameters only if the external perturbations are equaled to zero or independent with the regressor of the system. However, in real systems the disturbances are almost always non-vanishing and dependent with the regressor. In the presence of perturbations with such properties the above-mentioned identification approaches ensure only boundedness of a parameter estimation error. The main goal of this study is to close this gap and develop a novel online continuous-time parameter estimator, which guarantees exact asymptotic identification of unknown parameters of linear systems in the presence of unknown but bounded perturbations and has relaxed convergence conditions. To achieve the aforementioned goal, it is proposed to augment the deeply investigated Dynamic Regressor Extension and Mixing (DREM) procedure with the novel Instrumental Variables (IV) based extension scheme with averaging. Such an approach allows one to obtain a set of scalar regression equations with asymptotically vanishing perturbation if the initial disturbance that affects the plant is bounded and independent not with the system regressor, but with the instrumental variable. It is rigorously proved that a gradient estimation law designed on the basis of such scalar regressions ensures online unbiased asymptotic identification of the parameters of the perturbed linear systems if some weak independence and excitation assumptions are met. Theoretical results are illustrated and supported with adequate numerical simulations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. R. Ortega, V. Nikiforov, and D. Gerasimov, “On modified parameter estimators for identification and adaptive control. A unified framework and some new schemes,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol.50, pp. 278–293, 2020.
  2. Y. Pan, T. Shi, and R. Ortega, “Comparative Analysis of Parameter Convergence for Several Least-Squares Estimation Schemes,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, pp. 1–8, 2023.
  3. K. Narendra, and A. Annaswamy, “Robust adaptive control in the presence of bounded disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.31, no. 4, pp. 306–315, 1986.
  4. K. Narendra, and A. Annaswamy, “A new adaptive law for robust adaptation without persistent excitation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.32, no. 2, pp. 134–145, 1987.
  5. R. Ortega, and Y. Tang, “Robustness of adaptive controllers – a survey,” Automatica, vol.25, no. 5, pp. 651–677, 1989.
  6. P. A. Ioannou, and A. Datta, “Robust adaptive control: a unified approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.79, no. 12, pp. 1736–1768, 1991.
  7. K. Guo, and Y. Pan, “Composite adaptation and learning for robot control: A survey,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol.55, pp. 279–290, 2023.
  8. V. O. Nikiforov, “Observers of external deterministic disturbances. II. Objects with unknown parameters,” Automation and Remote Control, vol.65, no. 11, pp. 1724–1732, 2004.
  9. J. Davila, L. Fridman, A. Poznyak, “Observation and identification of mechanical systems via second order sliding modes,” International Journal of Control, vol.79, no. 10, pp. 1251–1262, 2006.
  10. J. Wang, D. Efimov, and A. Bobtsov, “On robust parameter estimation in finite-time without persistence of excitation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.65, no. 4, pp. 1731–1738, 2019.
  11. J. Wang, D. Efimov, S. Aranovskiy and A. Bobtsov, “Fixed-time estimation of parameters for non-persistent excitation,” European Journal of Control, vol.55, no. 4, pp. 24–32, 2020.
  12. de Mathelin M., R. Lozano, “Robust adaptive identification of slowly time-varying parameters with bounded disturbances,” Automatica, vol.35, no. 7, pp. 1291–1305, 1999.
  13. K. Wong, E. Polak, “Identification of linear discrete time system using the instrumental variable approach,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.12, pp. 707–718, 1967.
  14. T. Söderström, P. Stoica, “Instrumental variable methods for system identification,” Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, vol.21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2002.
  15. S. Pan, R. A. González, J. S. Welsh, and C. R. Rojas, “Consistency analysis of the simplified refined instrumental variable method for continuous-time systems,” Automatica, vol.113, pp. 108767, 2020.
  16. S. Pan, J. S. Welsh, R. A. González, and C. R. Rojas, “Efficiency analysis of the simplified refined instrumental variable method for continuous-time systems,” Automatica, vol.121, pp. 109196, 2020.
  17. A. Glushchenko, K. Lastochkin, “Exact asymptotic estimation of unknown parameters of regression equations with additive perturbations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14073 pp.1–6, 2023.
  18. A. Glushchenko, K. Lastochkin, “Supplement to “Instrumental Variables based DREM for Online Asymptotic Identification of Perturbed Linear Systems”,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15631. pp.1–7, 2024. https://arxiv.org/src/2312.15631v2/anc/supp.pdf
  19. A. G. Alexandrov, “Finite-frequency identification and model validation of stable plant,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol.32, no. 2, pp. 4064–4069, 1999.
  20. S. Boyd, S. S. Sastry, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for parameter convergence in adaptive control,” Automatica, vol.22, no. 6, pp. 629–639, 1986.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.