Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Evaluating District-based Election Surveys with Synthetic Dirichlet Likelihood (2312.15179v1)

Published 23 Dec 2023 in stat.ME, cs.MA, and stat.AP

Abstract: In district-based multi-party elections, electors cast votes in their respective districts. In each district, the party with maximum votes wins the corresponding seat in the governing body. Election Surveys try to predict the election outcome (vote shares and seat shares of parties) by querying a random sample of electors. However, the survey results are often inconsistent with the actual results, which could be due to multiple reasons. The aim of this work is to estimate a posterior distribution over the possible outcomes of the election, given one or more survey results. This is achieved using a prior distribution over vote shares, election models to simulate the complete election from the vote share, and survey models to simulate survey results from a complete election. The desired posterior distribution over the space of possible outcomes is constructed using Synthetic Dirichlet Likelihoods, whose parameters are estimated from Monte Carlo sampling of elections using the election models. We further show the same approach can also use be used to evaluate the surveys - whether they were biased or not, based on the true outcome once it is known. Our work offers the first-ever probabilistic model to analyze district-based election surveys. We illustrate our approach with extensive experiments on real and simulated data of district-based political elections in India.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Marginal likelihood and bayes factors for dirichlet process mixture models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 98, 461 (2003), 224–235.
  2. On probability models in voting theory. Statistica Neerlandica 48, 2 (1994), 133–146.
  3. Predicting winner and estimating margin of victory in elections using sampling. Artificial Intelligence 296 (2021), 103476.
  4. Voting contagion: Modeling and analysis of a century of us presidential elections. PloS one 12, 5 (2017), e0177970.
  5. Cleavage-based voting behavior in cross-national perspective: Evidence from six postwar democracies. Social Science Research 35, 1 (2006), 88–128.
  6. Dawkins, C. J. Measuring the spatial pattern of residential segregation. Urban Studies 41, 4 (2004), 833–851.
  7. Dawkins, C. J. Space and the measurement of income segregation. Journal of Regional Science 47, 2 (2007), 255–272.
  8. Twitter-based election prediction in the developing world. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media (2015), pp. 149–158.
  9. Constructing summary statistics for approximate bayesian computation: semi-automatic approximate bayesian computation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 74, 3 (2012), 419–474.
  10. A review of approximate bayesian computation methods via density estimation: Inference for simulator-models. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 12, 4 (2020), e1486.
  11. Sampling-based winner prediction in district-based elections. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2023), pp. 2661–2663.
  12. Improving election prediction internationally. Science 355, 6324 (2017), 515–520.
  13. Competing approaches to forecasting elections: Economic models, opinion polling and prediction markets. Economic Record 82, 258 (2006), 325–340.
  14. Minka, T. Estimating a dirichlet distribution, 2000.
  15. Mitra, A. Electoral david-vs-goliath: probabilistic models of spatial distribution of electors to simulate district-based election outcomes. In 2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (2021), IEEE, pp. 1–12.
  16. Mitra, A. Agent-based simulation of district-based elections with heterogeneous populations. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2023), pp. 2730–2732.
  17. Media effects and society. Routledge, 2016.
  18. Pitman, J. Exchangeable and partially exchangeable random partitions. Probability theory and related fields 102, 2 (1995), 145–158.
  19. Multi-district preference modelling. Quality & Quantity 57, 1 (2023), 587–613.
  20. Likelihood-free inference by ratio estimation. Bayesian Analysis 17, 1 (2022), 1–31.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.