Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Images in Discrete Choice Modeling: Addressing Data Isomorphism in Multi-Modality Inputs (2312.14724v1)

Published 22 Dec 2023 in cs.CV and stat.ML

Abstract: This paper explores the intersection of Discrete Choice Modeling (DCM) and machine learning, focusing on the integration of image data into DCM's utility functions and its impact on model interpretability. We investigate the consequences of embedding high-dimensional image data that shares isomorphic information with traditional tabular inputs within a DCM framework. Our study reveals that neural network (NN) components learn and replicate tabular variable representations from images when co-occurrences exist, thereby compromising the interpretability of DCM parameters. We propose and benchmark two methodologies to address this challenge: architectural design adjustments to segregate redundant information, and isomorphic information mitigation through source information masking and inpainting. Our experiments, conducted on a semi-synthetic dataset, demonstrate that while architectural modifications prove inconclusive, direct mitigation at the data source shows to be a more effective strategy in maintaining the integrity of DCM's interpretable parameters. The paper concludes with insights into the applicability of our findings in real-world settings and discusses the implications for future research in hybrid modeling that combines complex data modalities. Full control of tabular and image data congruence is attained by using the MIT moral machine dataset, and both inputs are merged into a choice model by deploying the Learning Multinomial Logit (L-MNL) framework.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. Combining discrete choice models and neural networks through embeddings: Formulation, interpretability and performance. Transportation research part B: methodological, 175:102783.
  2. The Moral Machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729):59–64.
  3. How do street attributes affect willingness-to-walk? city-wide pedestrian route choice analysis using big data from boston and san francisco. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 163:1–19.
  4. Bierlaire, M. (1998). Discrete choice models. In Operations research and decision aid methodologies in traffic and transportation management, pages 203–227. Springer.
  5. Understanding disentangling in β𝛽{\beta}italic_β-VAE. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03599.
  6. A survey on the explainability of supervised machine learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70:245–317.
  7. Review of image classification algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 13(22):4712.
  8. Image inpainting: A review. Neural Processing Letters, 51:2007–2028.
  9. The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research. Journal of choice modelling, 40:100303.
  10. A neural-embedded discrete choice model: Learning taste representation with strengthened interpretability. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 163:166–186.
  11. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, pages 1219–1240.
  12. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778.
  13. beta-vae: Learning basic visual concepts with a constrained variational framework. In International conference on learning representations.
  14. A systematic review of machine learning classification methodologies for modelling passenger mode choice. Journal of choice modelling, 38:100221.
  15. Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer vision. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 132:103371.
  16. A comprehensive review of past and present image inpainting methods. Computer vision and image understanding, 203:103147.
  17. Cyclists’ perception of streetscape and its influence on route choice: A pilot study with a mixed-methods approach. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 99:374–388.
  18. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
  19. Attitudes and latent class choice models using machine learning. Journal of Choice Modelling, 49:100452.
  20. Tell me where to look: Guided attention inference network. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9215–9223.
  21. Deep learning for generic object detection: A survey. International journal of computer vision, 128:261–318.
  22. Manski, C. F. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory and decision, 8(3):229.
  23. McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Research Record, (673).
  24. Attentionchoice: Discrete choice modelling supported by a deep learning attention mechanism. Available at SSRN 4305637.
  25. Measuring heterogeneous perception of urban space with massive data and machine learning: An application to safety. Landscape and Urban Planning, 208:104002.
  26. Deep convolutional neural networks for image classification: A comprehensive review. Neural computation, 29(9):2352–2449.
  27. A comprehensive and systematic look up into deep learning based object detection techniques: A review. Computer Science Review, 38:100301.
  28. Shen, J. (2009). Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data. Applied Economics, 41(22):2915–2924.
  29. Enhancing discrete choice models with representation learning. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 140:236–261.
  30. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. Pharmacoeconomics, 37:201–226.
  31. Moral rhetoric in discrete choice models: a natural language processing approach. Quality & Quantity, pages 1–28.
  32. Thomson, J. J. (1984). The trolley problem. Yale LJ, 94:1395.
  33. Van Cranenburgh, S. (2020). Blending computer vision into discrete choice models. preprint.
  34. Computer vision-enriched discrete choice models, with an application to residential location choice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08276.
  35. Choice modelling in the age of machine learning-discussion paper. Journal of Choice Modelling, 42:100340.
  36. Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 54:164–178.
  37. Deep hybrid model with satellite imagery: how to combine demand modeling and computer vision for behavior analysis? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04204.
  38. Deep neural networks for choice analysis: Architecture design with alternative-specific utility functions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112:234–251.
  39. Theory-based residual neural networks: A synergy of discrete choice models and deep neural networks. Transportation research part B: methodological, 146:333–358.
  40. Deep neural networks for choice analysis: Extracting complete economic information for interpretation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 118:102701.
  41. Modeling of moral decisions with deep learning. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, 3(1):1–14.
  42. Williams, H. C. (1977). On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and planning A, 9(3):285–344.
  43. A bi-partite generative model framework for analyzing and simulating large scale multiple discrete-continuous travel behaviour data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 110:247–268.
  44. Visual interpretability for deep learning: a survey. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19(1):27–39.
  45. Random erasing data augmentation. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pages 13001–13008.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.