Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Smart Highway to Babel: the coexistence of different generations of Intelligent Transport Systems (2312.13649v3)

Published 21 Dec 2023 in cs.NI

Abstract: The gap between technology readiness level in Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS) and its adoption and deployment has caused a phenomenon where at least two types of network access technologies have to coexist. Furthermore, for the case of ETSI Intelligent Transport Systems protocols, work is being completed in Release 2 of the specification while Release 1 deployments are still underway. This, coupled with industry and consumer trends in the vehicle industry, is bound to cause a scenario where fully C-ITS-enabled vehicles have to coexist with non-C-ITS road users and, at the very least, with different versions of C-ITS. In this paper, we analyze the performance in terms of efficiency and safety of two releases of the ETSI GeoNetworking protocol, as well as a discussion on possible paths to tackle the upcoming compatibility and coexistence problems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. European Commission (EC), “Towards a European road safety area: policy orientations on road safety 2011-2020,” July 2010.
  2. SAE, “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles,” SAE International, Standard, Apr. 2021.
  3. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; GeoNetworking; Part 4. Geographical addressing and forwarding for point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communications; Sub-part 2: Media-dependent Functionalities for ITS-G5,” ETSI TS 102 636-4-2 - V1.4.1, February 2021.
  4. ——, “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; GeoNetworking; Part 4. Geographical addressing and forwarding for point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communications; Sub-part 2: Media-dependent Functionalities for LTE-V2X,” ETSI TS 102 636-4-3 - V1.2.1, August 2020.
  5. D. Milakis, M. Snelder, B. Arem, B. Wee, and G. Homem de Almeida Correia, “Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: Scenarios for 2030 and 2050,” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 17, pp. 63–85, 01 2017.
  6. European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, “Average age of the EU vehicle fleet, by country.” [Online]. Available: https://www.acea.auto/figure/average-age-of-eu-vehicle-fleet-by-country/
  7. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; GeoNetworking; Part 4. Geographical addressing and forwarding for point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communications; Sub-part 1: Media-Independent Functionality,” ETSI EN 302 636-4-1 - V1.4.1, January 2020.
  8. O. Amador, M. Urueña, M. Calderon, and I. Soto, “Evaluation and improvement of ETSI ITS Contention-Based Forwarding (CBF) of warning messages in highway scenarios,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 34, p. 100454, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214209622000018
  9. O. Amador, I. Soto, M. Calderon, and M. Urueña, “Studying and improving the performance of ETSI ITS contention-based forwarding (CBF) in urban and highway scenarios: S-FoT+,” Computer Networks, vol. 233, p. 109899, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128623003444
  10. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Decentralized congestion control mechanisms for Intelligent Transport Systems operating in the 5 GHz range; Access layer part,” ETSI EN 102 687 - V1.2.1, April 2018.
  11. Ó. Amador Molina, “Decentralized congestion control in etsi intelligent transport systems and its effect on safety applications,” 2020.
  12. V. Sandonis, I. Soto, M. Calderon, and M. Urueña, “Vehicle to internet communications using the etsi its geonetworking protocol,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 373–391, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ett.2895
  13. S. Kühlmorgen, H. Lu, A. Festag, J. Kenney, S. Gemsheim, and G. Fettweis, “Evaluation of Congestion-Enabled Forwarding With Mixed Data Traffic in Vehicular Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 233–247, 2020.
  14. T. Paulin and S. Ruehrup, “On the Impact of Fading and Interference on Contention-Based Geographic Routing in VANETs,” in 2015 IEEE 82nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), 2015, pp. 1–5.
  15. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Part 3: Specifications of Decentralized Environmental Notification Basic Service,” ETSI EN 302 637-3 - V1.3.1, April 2019.
  16. R. Riebl, H. Günther, C. Facchi, and L. Wolf, “Artery: Extending Veins for VANET Applications,” in 2015 International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), 2015, pp. 450–456.
  17. C. Sommer, R. German, and F. Dressler, “Bidirectionally Coupled Network and Road Traffic Simulation for Improved IVC Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2011.
  18. D. Krajzewicz, J. Erdmann, M. Behrisch, and L. Bieker, “Recent Development and Applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility,” International Journal On Advances in Systems and Measurements, vol. 5, no. 3&4, pp. 128–138, December 2012.
  19. C. Sommer, S. Joerer, and F. Dressler, “On the applicability of Two-Ray path loss models for vehicular network simulation,” in 2012 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2012, pp. 64–69.
  20. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Part 2: Specifications of Cooperative Awareness Basic Service,” ETSI EN 302 637-2 - V1.4.1, April 2019.
  21. Volkswagen Group, “Volkswagen Group delivers 45 percent more all-electric vehicles in first 9 months.” [Online]. Available: https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/press-releases/volkswagen-group-delivers-45-percent-more-all-electric-vehicles-in-first-9-months-17771/
  22. C-ITS Deployment Group, “ASFINAG, Managing everyday traffic situations more easily with C-ITS / Car2X.” [Online]. Available: https://c-its-deployment-group.eu/news-events/news/2022-07-27-asfinag-c-its-imagevideo
  23. E. Rescorla, “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3,” RFC 8446, Aug. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446
  24. O. Levillain, “Implementation flaws in tls stacks: Lessons learned and study of tls 1.3 benefits,” in Risks and Security of Internet and Systems, J. Garcia-Alfaro, J. Leneutre, N. Cuppens, and R. Yaich, Eds.   Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 87–104.
  25. S. Lee, Y. Shin, and J. Hur, “Return of version downgrade attack in the era of tls 1.3,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, ser. CoNEXT ’20.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 157–168. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3386367.3431310
  26. C-ROADS, “C-ROADS platform position paper on 5.9 GHz band.” [Online]. Available: https://www.c-roads.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/media/Dokumente/C-Roads_Position_paper_on_59GHz_final.pdf
  27. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Pre-standardization study on co-channel co-existence between IEEE- and 3GPP- based ITS technologies in the 5 855 MHz - 5 925 MHz frequency band ,” ETSI TR 103 766, September 2021.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets