Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Finding Paths for Explainable MOOC Recommendation: A Learner Perspective (2312.10082v1)

Published 11 Dec 2023 in cs.IR and cs.LG

Abstract: The increasing availability of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has created a necessity for personalized course recommendation systems. These systems often combine neural networks with Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to achieve richer representations of learners and courses. While these enriched representations allow more accurate and personalized recommendations, explainability remains a significant challenge which is especially problematic for certain domains with significant impact such as education and online learning. Recently, a novel class of recommender systems that uses reinforcement learning and graph reasoning over KGs has been proposed to generate explainable recommendations in the form of paths over a KG. Despite their accuracy and interpretability on e-commerce datasets, these approaches have scarcely been applied to the educational domain and their use in practice has not been studied. In this work, we propose an explainable recommendation system for MOOCs that uses graph reasoning. To validate the practical implications of our approach, we conducted a user study examining user perceptions of our new explainable recommendations. We demonstrate the generalizability of our approach by conducting experiments on two educational datasets: COCO and Xuetang.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. Complementing educational recommender systems with open learner models. In LAK ’20: 10th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Frankfurt, Germany, March 23-27, 2020, Christoph Rensing and Hendrik Drachsler (Eds.). ACM, 360–365.
  2. Towards Explainable Educational Recommendation through Path Reasoning Methods. In Proceedings of the 13th Italian Information Retrieval Workshop (IIR 2023), Pisa, Italy, June 8-9, 2023 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3448), Franco Maria Nardini, Nicola Tonellotto, Guglielmo Faggioli, and Antonio Ferrara (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, 131–136. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3448/paper-29.pdf
  3. Learning Heterogeneous Knowledge Base Embeddings for Explainable Recommendation. Algorithms 11, 9 (2018), 137.
  4. The Effect of Algorithmic Bias on Recommender Systems for Massive Open Online Courses. 457–472.
  5. Interplay between Upsampling and Regularization for Provider Fairness in Recommender Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 31, 3 (jul 2021), 421–455.
  6. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin 140, 4 (2014), 980.
  7. Crowd-Based Personalized Natural Language Explanations for Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Boston, MA, USA, September 15-19, 2016, Shilad Sen, Werner Geyer, Jill Freyne, and Pablo Castells (Eds.). ACM, 175–182.
  8. Neural Attentional Rating Regression with Review-level Explanations. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2018, Lyon, France, April 23-27, 2018, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Fabien Gandon, Mounia Lalmas, and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis (Eds.). ACM, 1583–1592.
  9. COCO: Semantic-Enriched Collection of Online Courses at Scale with Experimental Use Cases. In Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 2 [WorldCIST’18, Naples, Italy, March 27-29, 2018] (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 746), Álvaro Rocha, Hojjat Adeli, Luís Paulo Reis, and Sandra Costanzo (Eds.). Springer, 1386–1396.
  10. SkillNER: Mining and mapping soft skills from any text. Expert Syst. Appl. 184 (2021), 115544.
  11. The Winner Takes It All: Geographic Imbalance and Provider (Un)Fairness in Educational Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Virtual Event, Canada) (SIGIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1808–1812.
  12. Neural Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2017, Perth, Australia, April 3-7, 2017, Rick Barrett, Rick Cummings, Eugene Agichtein, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich (Eds.). ACM, 173–182.
  13. Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospects. CoRR abs/1812.04608 (2018). arXiv:1812.04608 http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04608
  14. Reinforced Explainable Knowledge Concept Recommendation in MOOCs. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 14, 3, Article 43 (apr 2023), 20 pages.
  15. Goal-Based Course Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (Tempe, AZ, USA) (LAK19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 36–45.
  16. Novel online recommendation algorithm for massive open online courses (NoR-MOOCs). Plos one 16, 1 (2021), e0245485.
  17. René F. Kizilcec. 2016. How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, May 7-12, 2016, Jofish Kaye, Allison Druin, Cliff Lampe, Dan Morris, and Juan Pablo Hourcade (Eds.). ACM, 2390–2395.
  18. Equality of Learning Opportunity via Individual Fairness in Personalized Recommendations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 32 (10 2021), 1–49.
  19. Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 53, 4 (2022), 914–931.
  20. Zachary A. Pardos and Weijie Jiang. 2020. Designing for serendipity in a university course recommendation system. In LAK ’20: 10th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Frankfurt, Germany, March 23-27, 2020, Christoph Rensing and Hendrik Drachsler (Eds.). ACM, 350–359.
  21. UniWalk: Explainable and Accurate Recommendation for Rating and Network Data. CoRR abs/1710.07134 (2017). arXiv:1710.07134 http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.07134
  22. Reciprocal Peer Recommendation for Learning Purposes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) (LAK ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 226–235.
  23. Deepjyoti Roy and Mala Dutta. 2022. A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems. J. Big Data 9, 1 (2022), 59.
  24. Siriporn Sakboonyarat and Panjai Tantatsanawong. 2019. Massive open online courses (MOOCs) recommendation modeling using deep learning. In 2019 23rd International computer science and engineering conference (ICSEC). IEEE, 275–280.
  25. A course hybrid recommender system for limited information scenarios. Journal of Educational Data Mining 14, 3 (Dec. 2022), 162–188. https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM/article/view/608
  26. Hybrid Explainable Educational Recommender Using Self-attention and Knowledge-Based Systems for E-Learning in MOOC Platforms. In Responsible Data Science, Jimson Mathew, G. Santhosh Kumar, Deepak P., and Joemon M. Jose (Eds.). Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 61–74.
  27. Explainable Knowledge Graph-based Recommendation via Deep Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1906.09506 (2019). arXiv:1906.09506 http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09506
  28. Xuetao Tian and Feng Liu. 2021. Capacity Tracing-Enhanced Course Recommendation in MOOCs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 14, 3 (2021), 313–321.
  29. Attention is All you Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, Isabelle Guyon, Ulrike von Luxburg, Samy Bengio, Hanna M. Wallach, Rob Fergus, S. V. N. Vishwanathan, and Roman Garnett (Eds.). 5998–6008. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html
  30. Multi-level Recommendation Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs with Reinforcement Learning. In WWW ’22: The ACM Web Conference 2022, Virtual Event, Lyon, France, April 25 - 29, 2022, Frédérique Laforest, Raphaël Troncy, Elena Simperl, Deepak Agarwal, Aristides Gionis, Ivan Herman, and Lionel Médini (Eds.). ACM, 2098–2108.
  31. Yao Wu and Martin Ester. 2015. FLAME: A Probabilistic Model Combining Aspect Based Opinion Mining and Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Shanghai, China) (WSDM ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199–208.
  32. Reinforcement Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Explainable Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2019, Paris, France, July 21-25, 2019, Benjamin Piwowarski, Max Chevalier, Éric Gaussier, Yoelle Maarek, Jian-Yun Nie, and Falk Scholer (Eds.). ACM, 285–294.
  33. CAFE: Coarse-to-Fine Neural Symbolic Reasoning for Explainable Recommendation. In CIKM ’20: The 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Virtual Event, Ireland, October 19-23, 2020, Mathieu d’Aquin, Stefan Dietze, Claudia Hauff, Edward Curry, and Philippe Cudré-Mauroux (Eds.). ACM, 1645–1654.
  34. Reinforcement Learning Over Knowledge Graphs for Explainable Dialogue Intent Mining. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 85348–85358.
  35. Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Course Recommendation in MOOCs. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 27 - February 1, 2019. AAAI Press, 435–442.
  36. Yongfeng Zhang and Xu Chen. 2020. Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 14, 1 (2020), 1–101.
  37. Explicit factor models for explainable recommendation based on phrase-level sentiment analysis. In The 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR ’14, Gold Coast , QLD, Australia - July 06 - 11, 2014, Shlomo Geva, Andrew Trotman, Peter Bruza, Charles L. A. Clarke, and Kalervo Järvelin (Eds.). ACM, 83–92.
  38. SAR: A sentiment-aspect-region model for user preference analysis in geo-tagged reviews. In 2015 IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering. 675–686.
  39. RecBole: Towards a Unified, Comprehensive and Efficient Framework for Recommendation Algorithms. In CIKM ’21: The 30th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Virtual Event, Queensland, Australia, November 1 - 5, 2021, Gianluca Demartini, Guido Zuccon, J. Shane Culpepper, Zi Huang, and Hanghang Tong (Eds.). ACM, 4653–4664.
  40. Joyce Zhou and Thorsten Joachims. 2023. GPT as a Baseline for Recommendation Explanation Texts. CoRR abs/2309.08817 (2023). arXiv:2309.08817
  41. MOOC-Rec: Instructional Video Clip Recommendation for MOOC Forum Questions. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Antonija Mitrovic and Nigel Bosch (Eds.). International Educational Data Mining Society, Durham, United Kingdom, 705–709.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Jibril Frej (13 papers)
  2. Neel Shah (6 papers)
  3. Marta Knežević (2 papers)
  4. Tanya Nazaretsky (3 papers)
  5. Tanja Käser (45 papers)
Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.