Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Drivers and Barriers of AI Adoption and Use in Scientific Research (2312.09843v2)

Published 15 Dec 2023 in cs.CY, econ.GN, and q-fin.EC

Abstract: New technologies have the power to revolutionize science. It has happened in the past and is happening again with the emergence of new computational tools, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Despite the documented impact of these technologies, there remains a significant gap in understanding the process of their adoption within the scientific community. In this paper, we draw on theories of scientific and technical human capital to study the integration of AI in scientific research, focusing on the human capital of scientists and the external resources available within their network of collaborators and institutions. We validate our hypotheses on a large sample of publications from OpenAlex, covering all sciences from 1980 to 2020, and identify a set key drivers and inhibitors of AI adoption and use in science. Our results suggest that AI is pioneered by domain scientists with a `taste for exploration' and who are embedded in a network rich of computer scientists, experienced AI scientists and early-career researchers; they come from institutions with high citation impact and a relatively strong publication history on AI. The access to computing resources only matters for a few scientific disciplines, such as chemistry and medical sciences. Once AI is integrated into research, most adoption factors continue to influence its subsequent reuse. Implications for the organization and management of science in the evolving era of AI-driven discovery are discussed.

PDF HTML Abstract
Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (57)
  1. Finding needles in haystacks: Artificial intelligence and recombinant growth. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, pages 149–174. University of Chicago Press, 2018.
  2. N. Ahmed and M. Wahed. The de-democratization of ai: Deep learning and the compute divide in artificial intelligence research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2010.15581, 2020.
  3. The growing influence of industry in ai research. Science, 379(6635):884–886, 2023.
  4. D. Amodei and D. Hernandez. Review of ai and compute, 2018. URL https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/. OpenAI Blog.
  5. D. Archibugi. Choosing your mentor: A letter to creative minds. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, pages I99–13, 2021.
  6. Trends in the use of AI in science : a bibliometric analysis. Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. doi: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/418191.
  7. Identifying and measuring developments in artificial intelligence: Making the impossible possible. 2020.
  8. Artificial intelligence in science: An emerging general method of invention. Research Policy, 51(10):104604, 2022.
  9. Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Science, 61(7):1473–1495, 2015.
  10. P. Bourdieu. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6):19–47, 1975.
  11. B. Bozeman and E. Corley. Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4):599–616, 2004.
  12. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7-8):716–740, 2001.
  13. A. Cabrera and E. F. Cabrera. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5):687–710, 2002.
  14. The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w24449, 2018.
  15. J. S. Coleman. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94:S95–S120, 1988.
  16. J. N. Cummings. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3):352–364, 2004.
  17. L. Dahlander and D. A. McFarland. Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative science quarterly, 58(1):69–110, 2013.
  18. Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 602(7897):414–419, 2022.
  19. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, pages 147–160, 1983.
  20. The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Science, 56(9):1439–1461, 2010.
  21. S. M. Fiore. Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39(3):251–277, 2008.
  22. Science of science. Science, 359(6379), 2018.
  23. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5):875–908, 2015.
  24. M. F. Fox. Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. 1991.
  25. Funding risky research. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1(1):103–133, 2022.
  26. J. L. Furman and F. Teodoridis. Automation, research technology, and researchers’ trajectories: Evidence from computer science and electrical engineering. Organization Science, 31(2):330–354, 2020.
  27. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4):693–706, 2006.
  28. Learning to predict the cosmological structure formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(28):13825–13832, 2019.
  29. Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Research Policy, 38(4):610–623, 2009.
  30. T. Hwang. Computational power and the social impact of artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08971, 2018.
  31. B. F. Jones. The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? The Review of Economic Studies, 76(1):283–317, 2009.
  32. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold. Nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021.
  33. What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1):1–18, 1997.
  34. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 60(6):84–90, 2017.
  35. T. S. Kuhn. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press, 1962.
  36. E. Leahey. From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Annual Review of Sociology, 42:81–100, 2016.
  37. Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact. Research Policy, 44(3):684–697, 2015.
  38. G. Loewenstein. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1):75, 1994.
  39. J. G. March. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1):71–87, 1991.
  40. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013.
  41. The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4):653–683, 1999.
  42. OECD. A blueprint for building national compute capacity for artificial intelligence. (350), 2023. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/876367e3-en. URL https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/876367e3-en.
  43. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613(7942):138–144, 2023.
  44. N. Priaulx and M. Weinel. Connective knowledge: what we need to know about other fields to ‘envision’cross-disciplinary collaboration. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1):1–18, 2018.
  45. N. Rosenberg. Scientific instrumentation and university research. Research Policy, 21(4):381–390, 1992.
  46. What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, 44(10):1827–1843, 2015.
  47. Compute trends across three eras of machine learning. In 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2022.
  48. A. Taylor and H. R. Greve. Superman or the fantastic four? knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4):723–740, 2006.
  49. The importance of (exponentially more) computing power. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14007, 2022.
  50. Role of machine and organizational structure in science. Plos One, 17(8):e0272280, 2022.
  51. W. Tsai and S. Ghoshal. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4):464–476, 1998.
  52. Detrimental collaborations in creative work: Evidence from economics. Organization Science, 33(5):1741–1755, 2022.
  53. R. Van Noorden and J. M. Perkel. Ai and science: What 1,600 researchers think. Nature, 621(7980):672–675, 2023.
  54. Measures of curiosity: A literature review. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(3):363–389, 2021.
  55. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature, 620(7972):47–60, 2023.
  56. S. Wang and R. A. Noe. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2):115–131, 2010.
  57. The connectome of an insect brain. Science, 379(6636):eadd9330, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Stefano Bianchini (30 papers)
  2. Moritz Müller (20 papers)
  3. Pierre Pelletier (10 papers)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets