Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the conservation properties of the two-level linearized methods for Navier-Stokes equations

Published 14 Dec 2023 in math.NA and cs.NA | (2312.08696v1)

Abstract: This manuscript is devoted to investigating the conservation laws of incompressible Navier-Stokes equations(NSEs), written in the energy-momentum-angular momentum conserving(EMAC) formulation, after being linearized by the two-level methods. With appropriate correction steps(e.g., Stoke/Newton corrections), we show that the two-level methods, discretized from EMAC NSEs, could preserve momentum, angular momentum, and asymptotically preserve energy. Error estimates and (asymptotic) conservative properties are analyzed and obtained, and numerical experiments are conducted to validate the theoretical results, mainly confirming that the two-level linearized methods indeed possess the property of (almost) retainability on conservation laws. Moreover, experimental error estimates and optimal convergence rates of two newly defined types of pressure approximation in EMAC NSEs are also obtained.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. S. Bajpai and A. K. Pani. On three steps two-grid finite element methods for the 2D-transient Navier-Stokes equations. J. Numer. Math., 25(4):199–228, 2017. doi: 10.1515/jnma-2016-1055.
  2. R. Bermejo and L. Saavedra. Modified Lagrange-Galerkin methods to integrate time dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 37(6):B779–B803, 2015. doi: 10.1137/140973967.
  3. The mathematical theory of finite element methods, volume 15 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2008. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0.
  4. On conservation laws of Navier-Stokes Galerkin discretizations. J. Comput. Phys., 337:289–308, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.039.
  5. Efficient discretizations for the EMAC formulation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Appl. Numer. Math., 141:220–233, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2018.11.013.
  6. A two-level finite element Galerkin method for the nonstationary Navier-Stokes equations. II. Time discretization. J. Comput. Math., 22(1):33–54, 2004. https://www.global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/8849.html.
  7. J. G. Heywood and R. Rannacher. Finite element approximation of the nonstationary Navier-Stokes problem. I. Regularity of solutions and second-order error estimates for spatial discretization. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 19(2):275–311, 1982. doi: 10.1137/0719018.
  8. V. John. Reference values for drag and lift of a two-dimensional time-dependent flow around a cylinder. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 44(7):777–788, 2004. doi: 10.1002/fld.679.
  9. V. John and G. Matthies. Higher-order finite element discretizations in a benchmark problem for incompressible flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 37(8):885–903, 2001. doi: 10.1002/fld.195.
  10. W. Layton and L. Tobiska. A two-level method with backtracking for the Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35(5):2035–2054, 1998. doi: 10.1137/S003614299630230X.
  11. H. K. Moffatt and A. Tsinober. Helicity in laminar and turbulent flow. In Annual review of fluid mechanics, Vol. 24, pages 281–312. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA, 1992. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.001433.
  12. Longer time accuracy for incompressible Navier-Stokes simulations with the EMAC formulation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 372:113369, 17, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113369.
  13. P. W. Schroeder and G. Lube. Pressure-robust analysis of divergence-free and conforming FEM for evolutionary incompressible Navier-Stokes flows. J. Numer. Math., 25(4):249–276, 2017. doi: 10.1515/jnma-2016-1101.
  14. J. Shen. On error estimates of some higher order projection and penalty-projection methods for Navier-Stokes equations. Numer. Math., 62(1):49–73, 1992. doi: 10.1007/BF01396220.
  15. J. Xu. A novel two-grid method for semilinear elliptic equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 15(1):231–237, 1994. doi: 10.1137/0915016.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.