Cost Minimization for Equilibrium Transition (2312.07603v1)
Abstract: In this paper, we delve into the problem of using monetary incentives to encourage players to shift from an initial Nash equilibrium to a more favorable one within a game. Our main focus revolves around computing the minimum reward required to facilitate this equilibrium transition. The game involves a single row player who possesses $m$ strategies and $k$ column players, each endowed with $n$ strategies. Our findings reveal that determining whether the minimum reward is zero is NP-complete, and computing the minimum reward becomes APX-hard. Nonetheless, we bring some positive news, as this problem can be efficiently handled if either $k$ or $n$ is a fixed constant. Furthermore, we have devised an approximation algorithm with an additive error that runs in polynomial time. Lastly, we explore a specific case wherein the utility functions exhibit single-peaked characteristics, and we successfully demonstrate that the optimal reward can be computed in polynomial time.
- Pure Nash Equilibria and Best-Response Dynamics in Random Games. Math. Oper. Res., 46(4): 1552–1572.
- The Price of Stability for Network Design with Fair Cost Allocation. SIAM J. Comput., 38(4): 1602–1623.
- Enforcing Efficient Equilibria in Network Design Games via Subsidies. Algorithmica, 72(1): 44–82.
- Disarmament Games. In Singh, S. P.; and Markovitch, S., eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, February 4-9, 2017, San Francisco, California, USA, 473–479. AAAI Press.
- Disarmament Games With Resource. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-18), 981–988. AAAI Press.
- Complexity and Algorithms of K-implementation. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, Singapore, May 9-13, 2016, 5–13. ACM.
- Mechanism Design by Creditability. In Combinatorial Optimization and Applications, First International Conference, COCOA 2007, volume 4616 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 208–219. Springer.
- The Efficiency of Best-Response Dynamics. In Bilò, V.; and Flammini, M., eds., Algorithmic Game Theory - 10th International Symposium, SAGT 2017, L’Aquila, Italy, September 12-14, 2017, Proceedings, volume 10504 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 186–198. Springer.
- Best-response dynamics, playing sequences, and convergence to equilibrium in random games. arXiv:2101.04222.
- Hopkins, E. 1999. A note on best response dynamics. Games and Economic Behavior, 29(1-2): 138–150.
- Karp, R. M. 1972. Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems. In Miller, R. E.; and Thatcher, J. W., eds., Proceedings of a symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations, held March 20-22, 1972, at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA, The IBM Research Symposia Series, 85–103. Plenum Press, New York.
- Worst-case equilibria. Comput. Sci. Rev., 3(2): 65–69.
- Best-response dynamics in zero-sum stochastic games. Journal of Economic Theory, 189: 105095.
- K-Implementation. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 21: 37–62.
- Strong mediated equilibrium. Artif. Intell., 173(1): 180–195.
- Algorithmic Mechanism Design (Extended Abstract). In Vitter, J. S.; Larmore, L. L.; and Leighton, F. T., eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, May 1-4, 1999, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 129–140. ACM.
- Papadimitriou, C. H. 2011. Games, algorithms, and the Internet. In Srinivasan, S.; Ramamritham, K.; Kumar, A.; Ravindra, M. P.; Bertino, E.; and Kumar, R., eds., Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, Hyderabad, India, March 28 - April 1, 2011, 5–6. ACM.
- Routing Mediators. In IJCAI 2007, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1488–1493.
- Thorup, M. 1999. Undirected single-source shortest paths with positive integer weights in linear time. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(3): 362–394.